130 likes | 148 Views
Utilizing the IHOP 2002 data to study variability in surface water cycle and precipitation process. F. Chen, M. LeMone, T. Horst, D. Yates, S. Semmer, S. Trier, K. Manning, M. Tewari, H. McIntyre (NCAR) R. Grossman (Colorado Research Associates) R. Cuenca (Oregon State University)
E N D
Utilizing the IHOP 2002 data to study variability in surface water cycle and precipitation process • F. Chen, M. LeMone, T. Horst, D. Yates, S. Semmer, S. Trier, K. Manning, M. Tewari, H. McIntyre (NCAR) • R. Grossman (Colorado Research Associates) • R. Cuenca (Oregon State University) • D. Niyogi (North Carolina State University) • P. Blanken, J. Alfieri, J. Uebelherr(University of Colorado) • Motivation • IH2OP surface, vegetation, and soil observation network • Preliminary results
Scientific Issues • How does land surface (soil moisture, vegetation, terrain) contribute to the amount and variation of water vapor in PBL? • How well the BL structure reflect the underlying surface conditions • Under which condition do mesoscale circulation occur • How is BL depth affected • How do the above influence convection initiation and evolution
IHOP Surface, Soil and Vegetation NetworkURL:http://www.rap.ucar.edu/projects/land/IHOP/index.htm • Part of IHOP network to support the ABL mission • Nine NCAR surface-flux stations provide: • Complete surface energy budget, near-surface atmospheric conditions, precipitation • Soil moisture/temperature only at 5 cm depth • Enhance the NCAR surface stations by adding soil and vegetation instruments • Supported by NCAR Water Initiative(purchase soil and vegetation sensors, field trips)
Nine NCAR Surface, soil, and vegetation stations. Plus one (site 10) from CU Eastern Leg Sites 7, 8, 9 Central Leg Sites 4, 5, 6 ABLE Network Western Leg Sites 1, 2, 3 CU station 10 OK Mesonet
IHOP No Land Cover Fetch Lat Long Elevation (m) Legal 1 WW 10 36 28.370 100 37.075 871 S55 B10 HT and B Survey (Texas) 2 CRP grass 9 36 37.327 100 37.619 859 SW¼S19T2NR23E 3 Sagebrush + mesquite + cactus 9 36 51.662 100 35.670 780 N ¼ S32 T5NR23E 4 Grass 7-8 37 21.474 98 14.679 509 SE ¼ S12T31S R9W 5 WW 10 37 22.684 98 09.816 506 W ½ S2 T31S R8W 6 WW 10! 37 21.269 97 39.200 417 NW ¼ S16 T31S R3W 7 Grass, grazed 8 37 18.972 96 56.323 382 NE ¼ S36-T31S R4E 8 Grass, May be burned 9 37 24.418 96 45.937 430 SW¼ S27 T30S R6E 9 Grass, will graze cattle. 8-9, rolling 37 24.618 96 34.028 447 E½ S30 T30S R8E 10 Heavily grazed 9+ 36 53.544 100 36.202 NE ¼ S19T5NR23E (CU site) Methodology • Strategically place ten surface stations along the flight tracks and over different landuse types (range grass, wheat, sparsely vegetated) • Single profile of soil moisture and temperature sensors at seven stations: measurements centered at 7.5, 15, 22.5, 37.5, 60, 70-95 cm • Three profiles at Sites 1 and 9 ‘super sites’
Expected Data • Near-surface weather conditions, PAR, surface incoming and net radiation (full component at sites 1,8, and 9), precipitation, surface heat fluxes, ground heat flux • CO2 concentrations at sites 1 and 8 • Soil moisture content, soil water tension (potential), and soil temperature profiles from the surface to a depth of 90 cm (about seven weeks). Three profiles at sites 1 and 9 • Soil bulk density, soil texture, saturated hydraulic conductivity, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function, thermal conductivity, and the soil-water retention function. • Weekly vegetation data: NDVI, LAI, stomatal resistance, transpiration • Diurnal cycle of stomatal resistance and transpiration for a few selected sties
Rain accumulation (mm) Latent heat flux (W m-2) West leg Sites 1, 2, 3 Central leg Sites 4, 5, 6 East leg Sites 7, 8, 9
Weather Research Forecast(WRF)/ LSM coupled model verification (with 10-km grid spacing) 31 May 2002 Sites 1, 2, 3 Sites 7, 8, 9 M. Tewari and F. Chen
WRF/LSM coupled model verification Sites 1, 2, 3 Sites 7, 8, 9 M. Tewari and F. Chen
High-resolution land data assimilation system (HRLDAS) • Multi-resolution (4, 12 km) • Utilize: • 4-km hourly NCEP Stage-II; 1-km landuse type and soil texture maps; 0.5 degree hourly satellite derived downward solar radiation; T,q, u, v, from model based analysis; • To simulate the evolution of soil moisture and temperature, evaporation and runoff. • Hourly product (Jan-July 2002) 4-km surface soil moisture Valid at 12 Z May 29 2002
Impact of soil moisture on QPF 3-h rainfall ending 18Z 19 June 1998 (dryline case) MM5 using soil moisture from HRLDAS MM5 using soil moisture from NCEP EDAS coarse resolution and too wet S. Trier, K. Manning, and F. Chen
Important BL processes for convection initiation and intensification for the 19 June 1998 dryline case Mesoscale circulation formed as result of differential heating in the morning may be responsible for CI in OK Quasi-stationary convective rolls formed at the dryline seem critical for CI S. Trier, K. Manning, and F. Chen
Summary • Comprehensive atmospheric, soil, and vegetation data set from IHOP surface/soil/vegetation network • Allow a detailed analysis and improvement of LSM components • Verify couple model simulation • Study relationships among S-pol water vapor (Roberts and Wilson), King Air fluxes and water vapor (LeMone), and HRLDAS soil moisture and surface evaporation • Investigate the role of convective rolls and mesoscale circulations in CI and QPF with IHOP data