320 likes | 731 Views
The Ground Response Curve, Pillar Loading and Pillar Failure. G.S. (Essie) Esterhuizen Chris Mark Michael Murphy.
E N D
The Ground Response Curve, Pillar Loadingand Pillar Failure G.S. (Essie) Esterhuizen Chris Mark Michael Murphy The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Background • Review of retreat pillar mining • Role of overburden response in loading and failure of pillars Gob Gob Gob
Overburden response • Pillar loading • Pillar failure
Overburden response can determine whether pillars fail or not Stiff strong overburden Weak-soft overburden Well developed pressure arch Poorly developed pressure arch
Overburden behavior can be represented by a “ground response curve” Overburden stress 1600 Stress Load transferred to abutments by arching Weak Strong 30% 10% 20% 0 Load transferred to abutments by arching Convergence Load carried by internal supports
Ground response curves can be estimated using realistic numerical models 3500 ft Strong beds 2500 ft Coal bed Extraction panels
Ground response development conditions Ground response recorded at center of panel
Effect of panel width on ground responseDevelopment conditions - Depth 1500 ft - Western US geology 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Overburden stress Stress (psi) Width 80 ft 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Convergence (inches)
Effect of panel width on ground responseDevelopment conditions - Depth 1500 ft - Western US geology 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Overburden stress Stress (psi) Width 150 ft Width 80 ft 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Convergence (inches)
Effect of panel width on ground responseDevelopment conditions - Depth 1500 ft - Western US geology 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Overburden stress Stress (psi) Width 150 ft Width 250 ft Width 80 ft 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Convergence (inches)
Effect of panel width on ground responseDevelopment conditions - Depth 1500 ft - Western US geology 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Overburden stress Stress (psi) Width 500 ft Width 150 ft Width 250 ft Width 80 ft 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Convergence (inches)
Effect of panel width on ground responseDevelopment conditions - Depth 1500 ft - Western US geology 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Overburden stress Stress (psi) Width 1000 ft Width 500 ft Width 150 ft Width 250 ft Width 80 ft 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Convergence (inches)
Ground response at the pillar extraction line Ground response was recorded at center of extraction line Gob Extraction line
Ground response at the pillar extraction line Panel width 500 ft at 1500 ft depth – Western US geology 6,000 4,500 3,000 1,500 0 At extraction line Stress (psi) Stress (MPa) Overburden stress Development conditions 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 Convergence (inches) Convergence (m)
Pillar response curves Distributed stress over entire panel
Combined pillar and ground response curvesPillar W:H = 8 Overburden stress
Effect of panel width on pillar loading Pillar W:H = 8 Overburden stress
Effect of panel width on pillar loading Pillar W:H = 8
Effect of panel width on pillar loading Pillar W:H = 6 Overburden stress
Effect of panel width on pillar loading Yield pillar W:H = 3 Overburden stress 80 ft
Pillar loading at the extraction line500 ft wide panel at 1500 ft depth Western US geology Extraction line Development
Pillar loading at the extraction line500 ft wide panel at 1500 ft depth Western US geology Extraction line Development
Pillar loading at the extraction line500 ft wide panel at 1500 ft depth Western US geology Extraction line Development
Pillar loading at the extraction line500 ft wide panel at 1500 ft depth Western US geology Extraction line Development
Structural failure of pillars 14.0 Structural strength = peak resistance 12.0 10.0 Stress (MPa) 8.0 W:H = 6 6.0 Structural failure 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% Convergence
Functional failure of pillars Functional failure Convergence
Conclusions • Ground response and pressure arch formation are affected by: • Rock stiffness and strength • Panel width • Ground response affects: • Pillar loading • Ultimate success/failure of pillars • Ground response evaluation has demonstrated: • Importance of panel width on success of pillar mining • Structural failure of pillars does not necessarily imply functional failure • Functional failure appears to be related to ultimate pillar strain (%conv)