460 likes | 598 Views
Weaving Scientific Discourse into Your Science Classroom. Marie Crawford & Dr. Tom Keating April 1, 2014. You Can Access This Presentation At:. You Can Access The Resource Folder At: http://goo.gl/VJh0z0. http://goo.gl/JYfQhp. Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up!.
E N D
Weaving Scientific Discourse into Your Science Classroom Marie Crawford & Dr. Tom Keating April 1, 2014
You Can Access This Presentation At: You Can Access The Resource Folder At: http://goo.gl/VJh0z0 http://goo.gl/JYfQhp
Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up! Science programs provide a rich milieu in which to develop language and thought. Confronted with phenomena and given some freedom to investigate, children work hard at converting their experiences into language. Just as a person might draw a map to show someone how to get from one place to another, so children construct a language map that expresses the relationships they discover and the ways in which they interpret events. Their experiences compel them to conversation. Mary Budd Rowe (1973) Teaching Science As Continuous Inquiry
Questions to ponder in this session… • Why should we have students engage in purposeful, focused, & extended academic talk in science? • What are key features of academic language and academic conversations in science? • How can we scaffold & assess conversation skills?
Let’s look a little deeper… • Why should we have students engage in purposeful, focused, & extended academic talk in science?
Scientific Argumentation • Definition - The opportunity for students to engage in scientific reasoning by asking students to construct an argument and to evaluate critically the arguments of others = to develop their ability to reason and think • Argument and debate are common in science - virtually absent from Science Education! • Arguing from evidence is a Central Theme of NGSS - referenced to approximately 100 times in Framework Document • Need to establish norms of Scientific Academic Conversations in order to engage in meaningful and respectful Scientific Argumentation
Initial Evidence • Students don’t talk deeply enough. • When students do talk, it ends quickly (IRF). • Students use short sentences or fragments to express ideas. • Students don’t naturally listen well or build off the ideas of others. • Whole and small group discussions tend to produce limited academic talk. • The social aspect of learning is often overlooked.
Think Share • What are you noticing about the quality of conversations in your science classroom? • Share out your ideas
We want kids to… • Talk with purpose & focus • Actively listen & clarify • Elaborate & provide evidence • Build on each other’s ideas or challenge them • Connect and apply ideas to their lives and the world • See other perspectives • Grapple with Science content • Have flexible thinking • Take risks
What is Academic Language? Science vocabulary(brick) Hypothesize Evidence Analyze Justify PlanCritiqueCompare Evaluate Text structure Transitions Pronouns Clauses PrepositionsWord orderPunctuation Terms that travel across disciplines Grammar & organization Science vocabulary(brick)
3 Ingredients for Acquiring Language 1. Input 2. Output 3. Co-construction of Meaning
Conversational Behaviors Face Each Other Lean Forward Use Eye Contact Use Gestures
Strategy 1: Pro Con Improv • Pick a controversial topic with pro & con positions • Pair student and assign ‘director’ and ‘speaker’ roles • Director says ‘pro’ and speaker presents pro reasons for topic (30 secs) • Director says ‘con’ and speaker uses transition word (but, however,yet, on the other hand, etc,) and presents con reasons (30 secs) • Switch roles
Topic: Gray Wolf Reintroduction • TED Radio Hour: The Fragile, Invisible Connections of the Natural World • NPR Story: Government Revisits Contested Wolf Recovery Plan
Pro Con Improv: Gray Wolves • Discuss the Pros/ Cons of Gray Wolf Reintroduction • Director says ‘pro’ and speaker presents pro reasons for topic (30 secs) • Director says ‘con’ and speaker uses transition word (but, however,yet, on the other hand, etc,) and presents con reasons (30 secs) • Switch roles
Strategy 2: Interview Grid • Present students with an interview grid • Ask students to interview one student at a time, recording notes for each question. • Move to another student until at least 3-4 students have been interviewed. Interview Grid sample
Strategy 3: Take a Stand • State a deliberation question and post • Place ‘Yes/ Agree’ on one side of room and ‘No/ Disagree’ on the other side • Students write down answers with supporting argument • Direct students to ‘Take a Stand’ by going to the sign that they support • Students individually share their position, with option to change position
Strategy: Take a Stand Deliberation Question: Do you support the movement to delist the Gray Wolf as an endangered species? Support Resources • Current US Fish and Wildlife status for the Gray Wolf • The Wolf Conservation Center’s Support of the Gray Wolf • Montana FIsh, Wildlife and Parks Wolf Management Page
Think Share • How did these simple activities increase thinking and conversation? • Share out your ideas
Strategy 4: Academic Conversations • Poster of prompts & symbols • Feature cards with symbolsx • Hand motions for prompts • Model& practice scientific conversations Topic
Elaborate, Clarify, Probe Question Stems Can you elaborate on..? What do you mean by...? Can you tell me more about…? Clarify what you mean by… What makes you think that? Can you be more specific? Response Stems In other words,.. An analogy might be… What I mean is... AC Skill: Elaborate,Clarify, Probe Elaborate, Clarify, Probe x (pull hands apart) Frames for prompting the skill: Can you elaborate on..? What do you mean by..? Can you tell me more about..? Clarify what you mean by... What makes you think that? Can you be more specific? Frames for responding: In other words,.. An analogy might be... What I mean is...
Support ideas Question Stems What is the evidence for that? Where did you find that evidence? How do you justify that? What would illustrate that idea? Can you provide an example from something you have learned or experienced? Response Stems For example,… To demonstrate,... According to… For instance,... In the text it said that… AC Skill: Support Ideas Support ideas with evidence from this text, other texts, the world, & own life (Touch index fingers to make an X) Frames for prompting the skill: What is the evidence for that? Where did you find that evidence? How do you justify that? What would illustrate that idea? Can you provide an example? Frames for responding: For example,... To demonstrate… According to…. For instance,... In this text it said that...
Build on/ Challenge Ideas Question Stems What do you think about this idea? Can you add to this idea? Do you agree or disagree? Response Stems I would add that… I agree with_______because_______… I disagree with that because… I disagree with your use of that evidence because I want to expand on your point about… I see it another way… AC Skill: Build on/Challenge Ideas Build On and/or Challenge Ideas (Layer hands on each other and build up) Frames for prompting the skill: What do you think about this idea? Can you add to this idea? Do you agree or disagree? Frames for responding: I would add that… I agree with____because____... I disagree with that because… I disagree with your use of that evidence because... I want to expand on your point about...
Paraphrase Question Stems Does that make sense? I’m not sure if that was clear... Do you understand what I’m saying? What is your take on what I’m saying? Response Stems Let me see if I understand you...Is that right? So, what you are saying is that… To summarize, you are arguing that… It sounds like you are saying... AC Skill: Paraphrase Paraphrase partner’s ideas x (Touch ear) Frames for prompting the skill: Does that make sense? I’m not sure that was clear… Do you understand what I’m saying? What is your take on what I’m saying? Frames for responding: Let me see if I understand you… So what you are saying is… To summarize, you are arguing that… It sounds like you are saying...
Synthesize ideas Question Stems What have we discussed so far? Can we synthesize what we’ve discussed? How can we bring this all together? What main points can we share? What can we agree upon? What key ideas can we take away? Response Stems We can say that… As a result of talking, we think that… How does this sound…? The evidence seems to suggest..... AC Skill: Synthesize Synthesize conversation points (Cup both hands into a ball) Frames for prompting the skill: What have we discussed so far? Can we synthesize what we’ve discussed? How can we bring this all together? What main points can we share? What can we agree upon? What key ideas can we take away? Frames for responding: We can say that… As a result of talking, we think that… How does this sound…? The evidence seems to suggest...
Norms for ACs Norms: - We actively listen to each other - We share our own ideas and explain them - We respect one another’s ideas, even if they are different from our own - We respectfully disagree, while seeking to understand the other perspective - We accept challenges to our ideas - We let others finish their idea without interrupting - We try to come to some agreement in the end - We take turns and share air time
Behaviors for ACs Behaviors: • Appropriate eye contact • Face one another (with whole body) - Attentive posture (lean toward the partner) - Positive Gestures - Backchanneling, (Uh huh, Wow, Interesting, Hmmmm, Yes, Okay, I see, Really?) - Silence (to allow thinking and putting thoughts into words) - Prosody (changing voice tone, pitch, and emphasis)
Strategy 5: Conversation Lines • Students form 2 lines (or inner/ outer circles) facing each other. • Teacher poses a thought provoking question or controversial topic for students to discuss with partner. • One line moves, to provide new conversation partner. • Teacher poses same (or different) question/ topic • Repeat
Strategy: Conversation Lines Deliberation Questions: - What have been the benefits and problems from the reintroduction of the gray wolves? - Should keystone predators, such as the Gray Wolf, be protected under a different set of criteria than for other species? - Should the Gray Wolf be delisted as an endangered species?
Strategy 6: Fishbowl Conversation • Ask for 2 volunteers to present their conversation to the class or small group • Volunteers face each other and have a conversation based on a given topic or question • Observers offer feedback at end of conversation
Strategy 7: Structured Academic Controversy • Place students into groups of 4 • Introduced a real world topic to explore from differing perspectives (pro/con) • Students split into pairs to research and form argument for opposing sides • Group reforms, presents arguments then, thoughtfully listens and share back what was heard • Students switch sides and repeat process • Whole group selects best reasoning and synthesizes into new, agreed upon position
Strategy 7: Structured Academic Controversy Deliberation Question: - Should the Gray Wolf be delisted as an endangered species? Perspectives to consider: - Ecologist - US Fish & Wildlife Service - Ranchers & Hunters - Eco-tourists
Think Share • Discuss how the previous teaching strategies supported in-depth thinking and conversation. • Share out your ideas
Video - Two Young Scientists How do these ladies think and talk like scientists?
AC: More ‘talk time’ for everyone Notice the multiple conversations and social learning
Ask Higher LevelThinkingQuestions! Level 3 Question Stems What are the parts or features of...? Can you classify...according to... Can you predict the outcome of…? What evidence can you list for...? Which events could have happened...? How would you test….? What do you see as other possible outcomes? What conclusions can you draw from…? Level 2 Question Stems How is...an example of...? How is...related to...? Why is...significant? Could this have happened in...? Can you apply what you have learned to this..? Can you compare/ contrast? How would you summarize ____? Can you develop a set of instructions about...? Level 2 Question Stems How is...an example of...? How is...related to...? Why is...significant? Could this have happened in...? Can you apply what you have learned to this..? Can you compare/ contrast? How would you summarize ____? Can you develop a set of instructions about...? Level 4 Question Stems Can you defend your position about...? What information can you gather to support your idea about….? Can you apply information from multiple sources to develop an well substantiated claim or opinion? Can you develop a thesis, drawing from multiple sources of credible information? Level 1 Question Stems Retell Can you write in your own words...? Can you write a brief outline...? What do you think could of happened next...? Who do you think...? How would you describe Can you distinguish between...? What differences exist between...? Can you provide an example of what you mean...?
Level 2 Question Stems How is...an example of...? How is...related to...? Why is...significant? Could this have happened in...? Can you apply what you have learned to this..? Can you compare/ contrast? How would you summarize ____? Can you develop a set of instructions about...? Strategy 8:Teach Levels of Questioning
Think Share • Discuss ways that you might incorporate deeper questioning skills into conversations and/or whole group discussions • Share out your ideas
Questions to ponder in this session… • Why should we have students engage in purposeful, focused, & extended academic talk in science? • What are key features of academic language and academic conversations in science? • How can we scaffold & assess conversation skills?
Thank You for Joining Us! Contact Info: Dr. Tom Keating tkeating@scsdk8.org Marie Crawford mcrawford@scsdk8.org
Strategy 8:Teach Levels of Questioning Level 1: What are some of the benefits of reintroducing the Gray Wolf? Level 2: Compare and contrast the benefits and problems associated with reintroducing the Gray Wolf. Level 3: Identify and present the arguments for at least 2 distinct and opposing perspectives regarding the controversy to delist the Gray Wolf. Level 4: Synthesize the opposing arguments and perspectives regarding the controversy to delist the Gray Wolf and present your unique position.