450 likes | 639 Views
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CLASS FOUR. Today’s Topics. Search Incident to Arrest Pretext Arrest Plain View and Plain Touch Automobile Searches Exigent Circumstances Special Needs Searches Administrative Searches. SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST. Search Incident to Arrest.
E N D
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS FOUR
Today’s Topics • Search Incident to Arrest • Pretext Arrest • Plain View and Plain Touch • Automobile Searches • Exigent Circumstances • Special Needs Searches • Administrative Searches
Search Incident to Arrest • Major exception to warrant requirement • Accepted practice when Bill of Rights adopted
Scope of Search • Suspect’s “grab” area • Reasonable to search for both • Weapons • Evidence [contrast Terry]
Post-Arrest Movement • What impact on search incident to arrest when arrestee is allowed to move around to different areas?
Contrast with Protective Sweep • Conduct: quick and limited search of premises • Purpose: looking for individual posing danger to officer or others • Not automatic right • Requires reasonable suspicion (Terry) • Spatial limitations
Search of Person • Rule: With lawful custodial arrest, full search of person justified under 4th Amd • Rationales: • Need to disarm person to take into custody • Need to preserve evidence • Is search limited by type of crime for which person arrested?
Search of Person • Assume custodial arrest based on probable cause, what other justification is needed? • What if officer has discretion to make full custody arrest to just issue a summons or citation?
Impact on Automobiles • Bright Line Rule: Contemporaneous to arrest of occupant, police may search passenger compartment • Includes all containers found -- open or closed • What is a container?
Search Incident to Citation? • Search incident to citation is NOT the same as search incident to arrest
Concerns • Fear: Police might take advantage of relatively minor offense to forage for evidence of greater crimes • Fear exacerbated if initial stop or arrest was motivated by impermissible reason, such as race
Exercise • Identify 3 key arguments on each side of debate
Supreme Court’s Response • Fact that officers had probable cause to believe D had violated traffic code renders stop reasonable under 4th Amd • Only in very few areas has Court allowed officer motive to invalidate objectively justifiable behavior under 4th Amd • If race-based selection, proper remedy is equal protection challenge
Executive Branch Responses • National • State • Local
General Rule • Object of incriminating nature can be seized without warrant if in “plain view” of officer lawfully present at the scene
Relationship to Warrant Clause • Not an exception to warrant requirement • Independent justification for seizure of goods taken
Caution • Plain view applies to warrantless seizure • It does not authorize warrantless search for an item
Requirements • Officer within scope of lawful authority • Probable cause that object is evidence of crime [or contraband] • Probable cause immediately apparent [further search not necessary]
Expansion to Other Senses • Plain hearing • Plain smell • Plain touch [plain feel]
Areas of Concern • Should there be an “automobile” exception to the warrant requirement? • If so, what is its basis --- car’s inherent mobility, or reduced expectation of privacy? • What about property that can be moved in and out of cars?
Object placed in car [probable cause precedes] Chadwick [officers wait until footlocker is taken from train and put in car] Saunders [officers wait until suitcase placed in taxi] Object found during search of car Ross [informant tells officers D dealing drugs from trunk; police stop car] Historical Conflict
Contemporary Test • Acevedo • Police may search an automobile and containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is contained in car • One rule governs all automobile searches
Distinguish Search Incident to Arrest • Search incident to arrest needs no other justification • Search incident to arrest is limited to passenger compartment
Distinguish Search Incident to Arrest • “Automobile exception” is exception to general warrant requirement • Probable cause required to justify search under automobile exception
Application to Passengers • Acevedo and precursor cases involved warrantless searches of containers clearly owner by car’s driver • Issue: Does automobile exception apply to search of passenger possessions in the car?
Government Effective law enforcement Ready mobility Passenger often engaged in common enterprise with driver Individual Reduced expectation of privacy Traveling thorough public thoroughfares Seldom serve as repository for personal effects Subject to stops (pervasive gov’t control) Balancing Interests
Holding • Officers with probable cause to search a car may inspect passenger belongings found in the car that are capable to concealing the object of the search
Exercise • Is the Supreme Court correct in its conclusions about expectations of privacy in cars? Are cars frequently a repository for personal effects?
Concept • Exception to warrant requirement • Theory: Impractical for officer to get warrant • Implication: Immediate action required
Examples • Hot Pursuit • Safety • Evidence Destruction
Application Questions • Is type of crime a significant factor? • Can doctrine be applied to permit seizing premises while warrant being obtained? • Can doctrine be applied to permit restricted access to premise while warrant being obtained?
Concepts • Analyzed under “reasonableness clause” of 4th Amd • Searches made for purposes distinct from traditional law enforcement
Purposes Distinct from Traditional Law Enforcement • Might include: • Enforcing school policy • Upholding public safety • Promoting administrative efficiency • Contrast traditional law enforcement needs: • Detect crime • Prosecute offenders
Balancing Test • If challenged conduct is supported by special needs beyond criminal law enforcement, then Court uses balancing test • Need for search vs. • Degree of invasion on personal rights
Potential Hallmarks • Search or seizure conducted for reasons either unrelated or only indirectly related to investigation of prosecution of crime • Those conducting often are not police officers [although they can be] • Those subject to conduct often are not criminal suspects
ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES • Safety Inspection of Homes • Safety Inspection of Business • Warrantless entry into probationer’s home
Types of Justification • Administrative probable cause • Area-wide warrant • Statute/regulation offering warrant equivalent
Heavily Regulated Business • Examples: liquor, pawnshops, weapons dealers, mines • 3 criteria to support warrantless inspection • Substantial gov’t interest that informs regulatory scheme • Warrantless inspection necessary to further • Inspection program must provide constitutionally adequate substitute for warrant [certainty and regularity of application]