1 / 18

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Employers

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Employers. Nancy E. Taylor Greenberg Traurig. The Current Status. House: All three health care Committees passed similar bills. Next step - House floor action may happen as early as November.

Download Presentation

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Employers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Impact of Health Care Reform on Employers Nancy E. Taylor Greenberg Traurig

  2. The Current Status • House: All three health care Committees passed similar bills. Next step - House floor action may happen as early as November. • Senate: Both the HELP and Finance Committees have passed legislation. Next step – Senate floor action possible. Considering “dr.” fix on Tuesday. • Administration: President Obama is taking ownership of Health Care Reform with a strong political/policy desire to complete action.

  3. Individual Obligation • Individual must have coverage through: • Medicaid • Eligibility from those up to 100%, 133%, 150% FPL • Exchanges • Individual • Small Group • Employer Sponsored Coverage

  4. Coverage Obligation • Individual must obtain coverage: • Medicaid; • Medicare; or • Minimum Credible Coverage: • 65% Actuarial Value (Senate Finance); 73% (HELP) • 70% Actuarial Value (House)

  5. The Employer Mandate • Two constructs for employer obligation “Pay or Play” • Offer & contribute to health care coverage for all full time workers, (“Play”) OR • Pay a penalty for every worker (“Pay”). “Free Rider” • No obligation to offer coverage, BUT • Must pay a fee for any full time employee who receives a government subsidy to purchase coverage.

  6. “Pay or Play” • House • Play: Offer & contribute 72.5% of individual premium and 65% of family premium for full time employees (proportionate % for part time workers); OR • Pay: Penalty of 8% of total payroll. • Senate HELP • Play: Offer & contribute 60% of the individual premium for all workers; OR • Pay: Annual per worker fee of $750 for every full time worker and $375 for every part time worker.

  7. “Free Rider” • Senate Finance • For employers not offering coverage: • If full time employee gets a tax credit to purchase insurance in exchange, • Must pay a fee. • Penalty owed is the lesser of: • A flat fee equal to the average national tax credit; OR • $400 x # of full time employees at the firm.

  8. Firewall: Employer Mandate & Tax Credits • Senate Finance & Senate HELP proposals: Limit the flow of funds • If employer offers coverage, • Individuals cannot opt out and obtain a tax credit to purchase coverage through exchange.

  9. Firewall Exceptions • Affordability and Creditable Coverage Exceptions • If employee’s share of the premium is unaffordable (exceeds 10% of income): • the employee may be eligible for tax credit; and • employer may have to pay. • If employer’s plan does not meet the minimum creditable coverage standard: • employee may get tax credit; and • Employer may have to pay.

  10. Assessing the Impact • AHCA surveyed members • Gathered data for several facilities on the: • Number of employees; • Health care coverage offered; and • Amount employer contributed toward employee premiums; • Assessed how the data compared to the requirements of proposed legislation.

  11. What We Found • Number of employees • Varies (between 23,393 – 1 full time employee): • Up to 50 employees – 10 companies/facilities; • 50-200 employees – 11 companies/facilities; • Over 500 employees – 5 companies/facilities. • Coverage offered • All offer some type of health care coverage: • HSA/HDHP; • HMO; and • PPO. • Many offer a choice.

  12. What We Found • Contribution towards employee’s premium • All contribute towards premium for individual employee; • Varied methodologies: • fixed dollar amounts; and • percentages of premium. • Varied Amounts: • Range from 33% - 100%. • Eligibility requirements • Full time employees – 30 hrs or more; • Probation period in some instances.

  13. Assessing Data • How we fare under the various health reform proposals: • Do we meet the employer requirements? • If not, what would our penalties be?

  14. Example of Assessment - Company A • Data • 125 Full Time Employees; • HMO coverage for full time workers (30 hours per week) after 90 days of continual employment; • Employer pays 60% of health care premium. • Impact • HELP Committee – “play” requirement met: • Employer pays 60% of premium for all full time workers. • Finance Committee – employer offers affordable coverage. • House – fails to meet “play” requirement = PAY • Does not pay 72.5% of premium for individual coverage; and • Does not pay 60% of premium for family coverage; • MUST pay 8% of payroll.

  15. Example of Assessment - Company B • Data • 44 Full Time Employees; • PPO coverage for full time workers (24 hours per week) after 90 days of continual employment; • Employer pays 50% of health care premium for hourly employees and 100% for salaried employees. • Impact • HELP Committee – fails to meet “play” = PAY • Employer must pay $750 x 44 FTE = $33,000, plus • $375 x # of part time employees • Finance Committee – employer offers coverage • But is not required to offer coverage = small employer (<50 FTE) exemption. • House – fails to meet “play” requirement = PAY • Does not pay 72.5% of premium for individual coverage; and • Does not pay 60% of premium for family coverage. • MUST pay 8% of payroll.

  16. CLOSE… Most offer coverage. Most contribute to premiums. But not a slam dunk… Coverage may not be sufficient. Generally, contributions won’t be enough. Bottom Line: Impact as Employers

  17. Where We’ll Fall Short • House: Most will “Pay” Only 5 out of 27 Facilities meet the “play” requirements Sticking point: • Required to pay 72.5% of premium for individuals; AND • 65% of premium for families.

  18. Where We May Measure Up • Senate HELP: Most will “Play” 15 out of 26 Facilities meet the “play” requirements Sticking point: • Must pay 60% of premium for individual; but • Affordability exception to firewall provision (12.5% of employee’s AGI). • Senate Finance: Appears all will be exempt from penalty Possible Sticking point: • Affordability exception to firewall provision (10% of employee’s MAGI).

More Related