120 likes | 137 Views
Explore the impact of structural adjustment programs in the Arab region, from economic imbalances to rise of crony capitalism. Analyze the challenges faced, the shift towards market forces, and the consequences on economic growth.
E N D
NS4053Spring Term 2017Cammett: Chapter 8Structural Adjustment and the Rise of Crony Capitalism
Overview I • Economic imbalances caused by years of unsuccessful state-led strategy of ISI made status quo no longer possible without continual borrowing • Without some sort of reforms and fundamental restructuring likelihood of a vicious circle of debt, default and economic collapse • At best countries forced to live within their means • Problem – by itself • Stabilization not a strategy for growth or • Even regime preservation
Overview II • Chapter examines • Systems that emerged from restructurings undertaken in • RPLA and • RRLA • Focus is on the the 1990s • Question if state-led growth did not work as a development model what would? • In early 1990s most economists felt a return to market forces best way to allocate factors and revive growth • Collapse of the Soviet Union • Discredited centrally planned economies and • Supporters of the status quo • At same time globalization had become a formidable force
SAP Programs I • Challenge facing autocratic government governments: • Getting growth going and • Maintaining control over society • A common economic prescription to treat macroeconomic imbalances and other contradictions of state-led growth was the Washington Consensus • Washington Consensus centered on three pillars • Macroeconomic stability – especially price stability and real exchange rate devaluation • Relying on the market mechanism to allocate finance, labor and inputs and relying on the private sector to drive growth and • Greater openness to international trade and export led growth
SAP Programs II • Mechanism – by • Getting prices right and • The state out of the way • Hoped that private capital would • flow into productive investment • Produce exports and • Create jobs • While also stimulating efficiency thus enhancing international competitiveness • This would create a virtuous circle of • Inflows of foreign and direct investment • Bolstering financial soundness and in turn • Create more investment, exports jobs and wealth
SAP Programs III • Between mid-1980s and 1990s with support of the IMF and World Bank most of the countries of the region had adopted many of the Washington Consensus policies • By end of the 1990s • Region’s macroeconomic imbalances were reduced and • Economies were much more private-sector dricen • Problem – • What emerged was quite different than neoliberal model imagined by architects of the Washington Consensus
SAP Programs IV • The economic path of the RPLA and RRLA countries diverged further after the 1980s • In RPLA countries – Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, and Jordan needed to find a way to • Consolidate their rule and • Get the economic growth process restarted. • From their perspective SAP loan programs and economic policies of IMF and World Bank offered means to • switch from old social contracts with bureaucrats, farmers and workers • Toward a new alliance with business elites
SAP Programs V • Ultimately, SAPs did not deliver sufficient growth • Ran into very competitive export markets after the 1980s when • Asian exporters had established a wide lead and • Economies of Eastern Europe were rising • Politically connected firms that replaced public enterprises performed poorly • In the RRLA countries • Very little structural adjustment was undertaken • Given their oil revenues – relied more on repression than promise of economic prosperity • Narrowing alliance with security forces and cronies • Led to even lower economic growth and rising political instability
Crony Capitalism I • By 2011 clear the economic reforms had failed to transform the region • Principal weakness of new economic regimes that had emerged was the low demand for skilled workers • Governments stopped hiring • Jobs were not replaced by strong private sector demand • While the public sector had declined since the 1970s, size of formal private sector remained marginal • Only 10-15% in Morocco, Tunisia and Yemen • Better in Jordan at nearly 20% of labor force had formal private sector jobs
Private sector’s lack of dynamism seen in low rates of investment • Idea of state retrenchment was to make resources available for the private sector to invest based on market signals • But as public sector investment collapsed, private investment did not rise sufficiently to pick up the slack • In the RPLA countries public investment fell to 5.2% of GDP in the 2000s from nearly 12% in the 1970s • At 18.7% private investment in 2010 was only about 5% higher than in the 1970s • Level not sufficient to • Compensate for the rollback of the state or • Create type and number of jobs needed
Except in Lebanon coming out of its long civil war, total investment actually decreased everywhere • Can the Arab region’s economic underperformance be attributed to the type of state-business relations that have developed since the SAP reforms that began in the 1980s? • Some economists have argued the reforms did not go far enough • Political scientists have pointed to the rise of “networks of privilege” and “crony capitalists” with myopic short-term interests as the central reason for low economic growth
On paper reforms look impeccable on paper • Problem – difference between de jure an de factor rules • Detailed studies however show that governments have dispensed privileges only to a select few thus reducing the competitiveness and dynamism of the economy • Many stories of favoritism and insiders – resulted in political cronies controlling large chuncks of the private sector