1 / 15

IMMA position on the draft Horizontal Regulation

Informal document No. WP.29-144-24 (144th WP.29 session, 11-14 March 2008, agenda item 4.3.1.). IMMA position on the draft Horizontal Regulation. Dr NM Rogers. New moped definition.

scansler
Download Presentation

IMMA position on the draft Horizontal Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Informal document No.WP.29-144-24 (144th WP.29 session, 11-14 March 2008, agenda item 4.3.1.) IMMA position on the draft Horizontal Regulation Dr NM Rogers

  2. New moped definition IMMA considers the proposal to set the maximum speed of mopeds at 45 km/h inappropriate for the following reasons: • The <50cc + < 50 km/h moped is a basic part of the ECE structure and includes all other definitions • The proposal will reclassify 1.5 million production mopeds as motorcycles (EU = 0.4 million) • No technical justification given for this change • It would conflict with legislation in at least Brazil, Russia, China, Indonesia and Vietnam.

  3. L6 and L7 category vehicles (Quadricycles and ATVs)

  4. History – the “voiturettes” Isetta Ligier The origins of the “Quadricycle” are in Europe

  5. Quadricycles - standard These vehicles only exist in the EU (and some in Russia), nowhere else

  6. Quadricycles – body? A wide variety of vehicles cannot be defined easily

  7. Quadricycles - leisure Unclear border between registration and off-highway use

  8. Quadricycles - utility Commercial vehicles are/will be difficult to define

  9. Golf cartsNeighborhoud Electric Vehicles (NEV) • Are not considered L6-L7 in the EU (but some could be if “tweaked”?) • Are “registered” for use in enclosed community areas (USA)

  10. Concepts: all European developments Narrow car company Piaggio P104 GG Quad Bertone

  11. Concepts/Near Fits ITRE eCooter Peugeot Quark FCV • How far will industry/authorities want to stretch the definitions?

  12. ATV • The ATV is not unique to Europe, but its homologation/registration is. • This is an example of how the L6-L7 category has been “extended” beyond the original concept.

  13. ATV – side-effects

  14. Considerations • L6-L7 were developed in and for Europe • If further developed in ECE, these categories will be used (abused?) to bring all kind of vehicles onto the road. • Better for the ECE to be for vehicles that are used everywhere (Cars, PTWs, Trucks) • Vehicles outside these criteria are better regulated at regional level, this includes L6-L7. • Some Contracting Parties will not accept ECE Regulations which include L6 and L7 vehicles.

  15. Conclusions • Quadricycles and ATVs are not motorcycles • There is no industrial interest in trying to harmonise at the ECE level • ATVs are not intended for road use • If quadricycles and ATVs come to the ECE, they should be separated from the existing L-category vehicles

More Related