1 / 7

Triage on Tracks 1 & 2

Triage on Tracks 1 & 2. With some personal opinions. Henson Graves. For Each Thread We Want To Identify. where solutions already available, if you know where to look where problems require significant research

scarlet-clemons
Download Presentation

Triage on Tracks 1 & 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Triage on Tracks 1 & 2 With some personal opinions Henson Graves

  2. For Each Thread We Want To Identify • where solutions already available, if you know where to look • where problems require significant research • where there is an opportunity to make useful progress within the timescale of the ontology summit, or not The list of emerging threads from the introduction is used as the starting point, we can add other ones

  3. Composite System Modeling • Including parts, components, roles, qua-objects, functions , part replacement and virtual individuals, • Clearly engineers are not the only ones interested in this, but presently it is critical in engineering • Need list a triaged list of references suitable for engineers • Need to identify issues where we can achieve something beyond literature

  4. System Descriptions For Different Uses, e.g., Requirements & Design • Anatoly’s presentation and references address this • There is lot of current system engineering discussion concerning formalizing requirements so they can be embedded as models (ontologies) within engineering languages and refining requirements models to design models • which may put a different perspective on the problem

  5. Success And Relevance Of Semantic Issues In Engineering • There has been push back on this topic on the grounds that it was covered last year • However, marketing ontology is not the same as establishing where there are successes and analysis of failures, and conditions that might drive success • this is of great concern to engineering decision makers

  6. Distinctions Between Natural And Artificial Systems • Unlikely to make significant progress on this in Summit time frame • An alternative: discussion of rules of engagement in war where circumstances are specified in which it is ok or not ok to kill someone, or mandatory that they be killed • Artificial systems are being given and are acting on such rules now, its definitely a current engineering problem • It also has legal and moral impliciations

  7. Semantic Interoperability • Giancarlo posed ontologies as reference models of consensus to provide bridges • While true one needs much more specifics e.g., how to deal with different levels of abstraction, different terminology and different axioms sets • What is a good triaged literature relevant to solutions, not the problem

More Related