1 / 18

SIXTH JISC INFORMATION STRATEGIES CONFERENCE: FOCUS ON FUNDING

SIXTH JISC INFORMATION STRATEGIES CONFERENCE: FOCUS ON FUNDING. Purchasing Decisions for Electronic Resources Within HEIs 7th Dec 2000. PURCEL. The Background/History The set-up/Organisation The Methodology Getting the Information The Preliminary Results. PURCEL: JISC Background.

scout
Download Presentation

SIXTH JISC INFORMATION STRATEGIES CONFERENCE: FOCUS ON FUNDING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SIXTH JISC INFORMATION STRATEGIES CONFERENCE: FOCUS ON FUNDING Purchasing Decisions for Electronic Resources Within HEIs 7th Dec 2000

  2. PURCEL • The Background/History • The set-up/Organisation • The Methodology • Getting the Information • The Preliminary Results

  3. PURCEL: JISC Background • Joint CALT/CEI working group • JISC Monitoring Advisory Unit survey • COST

  4. PURCEL: Remit • Funding Model variations • Good Practice • Dissemination • Charging Policy for e-is access

  5. PURCEL: Consortium • Sunderland [lead] • Abertay Dundee • Glasgow • Glasgow Caledonian • University College London • Queen Mary and Westfield College

  6. PURCEL: Questions? • Definition? • Budget or Model? • Who do we canvass? • Who to we target? • Culture?

  7. PURCEL: Decisions • Canvass all HEIs • Target the actual budget manager • Investigate the culture of the institution • Definition: e-resources are- • Databases [CHEST] • E-serials [NESLI] • Reference and EDD Services

  8. PURCEL:Methodology • Literature Search • Questionnaire • Interviews • Case Studies • Workshops • Final Report • Dissemination

  9. PURCEL: The Questionnaire • Control Architecture (5 questions) • Broad patterns of practice (5 questions) • Who pays? • Who decides? • What is bought? • Factors which influence decisions?

  10. Questionnaire Results: Control Architecture • Academic Planning Board - 75% • No policy/resources committee at faculty level - 68% • Library budget top-sliced - 66% • Library budget devolved - 1%

  11. Questionnaire Results: Patterns of Practice • No formal policy for electronic resources provision - 75% • variable, non-fixed e-resource budget - 68% • e-resources bought from book or serials fund - 85%

  12. Questionnaire results: Who Decides? • The Librarian (+library staff) - 52% • The librarian (+academic staff) - 30%

  13. The Questionnaire: What do we buy? • Average HEI budget for e-resources - £136k • Percentage of total budget - 16% • Databases - 64% • E-serials - 27% • Reference material - 8.4% • EDD - 1.6%

  14. The Questionnaire: Factors influencing decisions • Cost of annual subscriptions(4.6) • Relevance to need (4.6) • declining budget (3.9) • defective consultation process (3.8) • Inflexible publishers’ deals (3.7) • licensing/network problems (3.7)

  15. Interview Results • Funding allocation mechanisms • The consultation process • Ineffective evaluation and monitoring

  16. space “old” v “new” budget devolvement bundled deals estimating/forecasting evaluation collection development issues decisions-making process complexity of deals licensing PURCEL Workshops: issues raised

  17. PURCEL: Conclusions • Few formal policies or strategies • Funding models are print-based • Evaluation procedures undeveloped • Publisher deals are too complex • Decision-making is library-controlled

  18. PURCEL: Report to Follow

More Related