1 / 10

M&E State Facilitators Feb, 2008

M&E State Facilitators Feb, 2008. M&E CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Program Planning. Assessment Review and Evaluation. Monitoring/Tracking. Input Planning. LFA indicators Tracking work-plan Process Indicators * Coverage -Physical -Vulnerable * Staffing * Service quality & mgt.

sealey
Download Presentation

M&E State Facilitators Feb, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. M&E State Facilitators Feb, 2008

  2. M&E CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Program Planning Assessment Review and Evaluation Monitoring/Tracking Input Planning • LFA indicators • Tracking work-plan • Process Indicators • * Coverage • -Physical • -Vulnerable • * Staffing • * Service quality & mgt. • * Logistics • * Finance • Reporting Systems • @ Monthly • @ Quarterly • @ Bi-annual • Output Assessment • Performance • Quality & Mgt. • Finance • Evaluation • Baseline • Mid-term • Endline • Data Validation • Internal • External • Triangulation • Survey data • Service statistics • Community reporting/monitoring Institutional strengthening + Technical Inputs SPIP’s/DPIP’s Service Delivery Estimation ECR/CNAA Feed-Back 2

  3. Timely submission Regular Information on agreed/ mandatory set of indicators Data disaggregated by gender and disadvantaged section (vulnerable groups) Validation of data through independent external agencies Timely and regular dissemination of information Reporting only on new format 3

  4. Development of single window integrated MIES format for capturing interventions under NRHM – Monthly, Quarterly and Annually • 22 States sending data in the new format • Sensitization of stakeholders on MIES format • Web-based data capturing system for MIES data 4

  5. 5

  6. Concurrent Evaluation of NRHM • Quality Monitoring – Tools Developed , pilot initiated in six states • Impact Evaluation - NFHS-3 key indicators and National Report released - DLHS-3 under progress - Annual Health Survey by RGI – Financial Support by MOHFW • Realigning research activities of PRCs on NRHM related research areas • Clearing House on Information • Rationalisation and vetting of new information demands 6

  7. Institutional strengthening • M&E Cells in District and sub-district levels • Nodal M&E officer • Enhancing IT capabilities • Capacity Building of M&E personnel • E-mode transfer of data • from District level • eventually from sub-district levels • Establishing/Reinforcing a feed back mechanism for quicker corrections • Community involvement to be reinforced • A single window system for dissemination of information 7

  8. State-level • Is the State Planning & budgeting for M&E in the PIPs • Does the State review the MIS reports • At what level, frequency • Is facility-wise information being monitored • Actions being taken • Is the SPMU/DPMUs in position • Retention/continuity • How is IT (PC, Internet, e-mail) being used for MIS data flows • Are the Integrated MIES formats being used • Suggestions/feedback • Role and involvement of State Demographer in MIS 8

  9. District-level • Does the District review the Block-level/facility-wise MIS reports • At what level, frequency • Is facility-wise information being monitored • Actions being taken • Is the DPMU/BPMUs in position • How is IT (PC, Internet, e-mail) being used for MIS data flows • Are the Integrated MIES formats being used • Suggestions/feedback • Training to PMU/MIS manpower • Retention, continuity of PMU personnel 9

  10. Facility-level • Type of MIS reports being prepared • What registers are being updated • Is it being monitored/supervised – by whom • Who reviews the MIS data sent up – level & frequency • Problems in filling up forms • How is IT (PC, Internet, e-mail) being used for MIS data flows • Are the Integrated MIES formats being used • Suggestions/feedback Sub-centre Upkeep of registers, filling up forms, ECR register, Household surveys 10

More Related