1 / 11

PRBoA FAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement

PRBoA. IAPoA. PRBoA FAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266 , its IRR and Derivative Regulations 28 October 2007 Waterfront Hotel Cebu City, Metropolitan Cebu/ Region VII by the PRC Professional Regulatory Board of Architecture ( PRBoA )

seda
Download Presentation

PRBoA FAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PRBoA IAPoA PRBoA FAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations 28 October 2007 Waterfront Hotel Cebu City, Metropolitan Cebu/ Region VII by the PRC Professional Regulatory Board of Architecture(PRBoA) Archt. Armando N. ALLÍ, fuap, aaif Chairman, PRBoA (Presentor) with PRBoA Members Archt. Angeline T. CHUA CHIACO, fuap Archt. Marietta B. SEFGOVIA, uap, aaif

  2. PRBoA IAPOATo date, there is NO Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), NO Writ of Preliminary Injunction (WPI or Injunction) and NO Constitutionality Question on ANY Provision of R.A. No. 9266, (Architecture Act of 2004), its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) and Derivative Regulations Issued by the PRBoA and the PRC in Support of R.A. No. 9266 or the Predecessor Architecture Laws (R.A. Nos. 1581 of 1956 and R.A. No. 545 of 1950) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  3. PRBoA IAPOAThe Writ of Preliminary Injunction (WPI or Injunction) secured by the PICE on 24 May 2005 only covers Sections 302.2 and 302,4 of the 2004 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (R-IRR) of the 1977 National Building Code of the Philippines or NBCP (otherwise known as P.D. No. 1096), which are MERE LISTS of documents to be submitted to the Office of the Building Official (OBO) as part of an application for a building permit. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  4. PRBoA IAPOAThe Injunction secured by the PICE on 24 May 2005 covers only PORTIONS OF A MERE EXECUTIVE ISSUANCE (IRR). It does NOT apply to R.A. No. 9266, a STATUTE or LAW (of national application). ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor) Laws do not Operate in Isolation but in Full Interaction with Other Laws that are in Place.

  5. PRBoA IAPOATHE CEs MAY HAVE MISREPRESENTEDFACT AND LAW TO OBTAIN THE 2005 INJUNCTION. THE CEs MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR SUCH ACTS. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  6. PRBoA IAPOANEITHER THE 03 MAY 2005 PICE PETITION FOR TRO/ WPI NOR THE 24 MAY 2005 INJUNCTION MENTIONS R.A. No. 9266. THE INJUNCTION DOES NOT APPLY TO R.A. 9266, ITS IRR NOR TO ITS DERIVATIVE REGULATIONS. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)PRBoA 4. mid-2007 through 2009Implementation: Maintain a High but Realistic Level of ALE to Assure the Quality of Professionals ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The PRBoA Program (2007 - 09) for the Full Implementation and Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266 by The PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PresentorPRBoA 6a.mid-2007 through mid-2008 Enforcement:PRBoA Liaison with Legal Entities in Government ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The PRBoA Program (2007 - 09) for the Full Implementation and Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266 by The PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, Presentor)

  7. PRBoA IAPOATo date, it has been almost TWO (2.0) YEARS since the UAP-IAPOA filed a MOTION TO LIFT the Writ of Preliminary Injunction (WPI or Injunction) and ABOUT ONE AND ONE-HALF (1.5) YEARS since the time the DECISION in the Manila RTC Branch 22 Case should have been PROMULGATED. There is already need for ample explanation concerning this delay. The Supreme Court Administrator needs to be notified asap. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  8. PRBoA IAPOATo date, ANY Registered and Licensed Architect (RLA), particularly if a UAP-IAPOA Member, can bring a verified complaint (based on one’s direct and personal knowledge) against ANYONE for the willful violation of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and derivative regulations i.e. specifically against National Government Officials, Governors, Mayors, Building Officials, Municipal/ City Engineers, CIVIL ENGINEERS and the like . ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  9. PRBoA IAPOATo date, at least four (4) civil and criminal cases involving the PICE and the UAP-IAPOA are already being heard : 1) PICE, Gamolo vs. DPWH Secretary (for declaratory relief/ TRO/ injunction issuance vs. Secs. 302.3 & 4 of the 2004 Revised IRR of P.D. No. 1096) ;2) PICE vs. EM Florentino, UAP National Board & Officers, etc. for indirect contempt;3) Archt. Winstoney Salceda vs. CE Don Emmanuel Santy for the illegal practice of architecture; and4) PICE vs. Archts. Armando Alli (as public respondent) & Winstoney Salceda (as private respondent) for indirect contempt. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  10. PRBoA IAPOATo date, ANY Registered and Licensed Architect (RLA), particularly if a UAP-IAPOA Member, can bring a verified complaint (based on ones’s direct and personal knowledge) against ANYONE for the willful violation of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and derivative regulations i.e. specifically against National Government Officials, Governors, Mayors, Building Officials, Municipal/ City Engineers and the like . ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRBoAFAST FACTS Relative to the Full Implementation & Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266, its IRR and Derivative Regulations by The PRC PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, PRBoA Chair as Presentor)

  11. PRBoA IAPoA Thank You and a Pleasant Afternoon to You All! ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The PRBoA Program (2007 - 09) for the Full Implementation and Enforcement of R.A. No. 9266by The PRBoA (Archt. Armando N. ALLI, fuap, aaif, Presentor)

More Related