150 likes | 274 Views
International Intercomparison of Radon Reference Facilities (Chambers). melinda ronca-battista. What do estimates of risk, decisions to mitigate, reassurance that mitigation is not necessary, the success OF mitigation, and the livelihood of this industry all depend on ?.
E N D
International Intercomparison of Radon Reference Facilities (Chambers) 2018 International Radon Symposium™ melinda ronca-battista
What do estimates of risk, decisions to mitigate, reassurance that mitigation is not necessary, the success OF mitigation, and the livelihood of this industry all depend on?
What is a true 1 pCi?How do we know our results really ARE 1 pCi? • About 130 radioactive decays in 1 pCi every hour • Different methods measure differently—some can detect only about 2 out of these 130 decays • Aka “efficiency” or calibration factor • Some measure alphas, some the betas and alphas, and some just the gammas
Calibrations and spikes conducted in reference chambers • We calibrate our field measurements in our reference chambers, but… • How do our standard reference chambers know for sure that what they measure as 10 pCi in their chamber really IS 10 pCi??
NIST=National Institute of Standards and Technology • Sells over 1300 “standards” used to calibrate measurement devices • Called Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) • SRM alcohol solutions to calibrate breathalyzers, cylinders of CO to calibrate CO analyzers • Even long lived radioactive SRMs like C-14 • But there are NOSRMs of radon
Instead, like ozone, radon gas must be generated in reference chambers using Radium-226 • NIST Standard Reference Materialradium-226 sources emit radon-222 gas atoms at a known rate dependent on the # of curies in the SRM • This “perfectly known” # of radon atoms are then mixed with an extremely accurately known volume of air to produce a “true” pCi/L concentration
The EPA’s lab in Montgomery generates “true” concentrations using a NIST SRM • EPA then intercompares with the US Certified Secondary Chambers in Ohio (BMI) and Kansas (KSU) • Secondary Chambers compare with Tertiary Chambers
How do US secondary chambers compare with the rest of the world?andHow do all the US tertiary chambers compare with each other? • The first question is being answered with an International Intercomparison Project sponsored by COIRA
UK Radon Association (UKRA) Nordic Group Radon Association (NGRA)
Radon Chamber IntercomparisonProgram Goals • Consistency of radon measurements • Reference instruments shipped between each of the participating chambers • Each facility’s radon concentration is compared to the reference instrument in a blind exposure • Maintain anonymity & publish results in a peer reviewed scientific journal
Project Design • Develop/Approve Procedures (SOPs) • Specifications for Reference Instruments • Identify Chamber Candidates • BMI, KSU in the US • SURO (Czech Republic), BfS (Germany), SSM (Sweden), PHE (UK), Pylon and Canada-Radiation Safety Institute in Canada
Reference Instruments • High efficiency • Rugged and extremely stable • Large memory retention • Proven in previous intercomparisons • Software versatile and secure • Calibrations, equipment, and software donated • Alpha Track Detectors donated as trip blanks
September 2018 Status • SOPs drafted and approved • US exposures being conducted • Preliminary US results indicate almost unbelievable agreement between chambers
October 2018 • Set of instruments being shipped to Canada • After Canada, to Europe • Study duration 2-3 years • Preliminary results reported in 2019 • Expected to demonstrate close agreement