1 / 16

C2 Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Coyote LRESD Experiment Set-Up

C2 Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Coyote LRESD Experiment Set-Up. Eric Dorion and Maj M Gareau presented by Valdur Pille SAS Symposium – April 23-25 2002. Outline. The C2 Assessment Process Formulating the LRESD Experiment Problem/Aim Measures of Merit for the Experiment

selah
Download Presentation

C2 Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Coyote LRESD Experiment Set-Up

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C2 Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Coyote LRESDExperiment Set-Up Eric Dorion and Maj M Gareau presented by Valdur Pille SAS Symposium – April 23-25 2002

  2. Outline • The C2 Assessment Process • Formulating the LRESD Experiment Problem/Aim • Measures of Merit for the Experiment • Scenario Events to Elicit Coyote Responses • Lessons learned • Conclusion

  3. The C2 Assessment Process

  4. Formulating the Problem – Aim of the experiment To demonstrate through rigorous experimentation how the Enhanced LAV Recce (ELR) allows for an increased Situation Awareness when compared to a standard LAV Recce. Efforts invested in this experiment are made in conjunction with the ISTAR TD projects

  5. Visible spectrum camera Passive Infrared camera Radar Visible spectrum camera Passive Infrared camera Radar Active Infrared camera Acoustic sensor array Coyote Battle Management System (CBMS) Standard vs Enhanced Coyote Standard Enhanced

  6. Voice Voice and Data Experiment Physical Set-up Increase in SA is reflected in the quality of the Information product Coyote 2 pers - mil Information product Δ Information product ELR C4ISR Mobile Lab

  7. Quality of Information product Information Accuracy Information Timeliness ? High-Level MoE: Situation Awareness Secondary MoE MoPs

  8. Measuring MoPs Standard Coyote Duty Officer ELR Duty Officer Exercise Administration and Management Experimentation Controller Scenario Controller 53’

  9. Experiment Surveillance Targets • A wide range of targets were used to measure the capacity of the sensor suites • Different target attitudes were also directed to cover the different capabilities of the sensors: • moving target • immobile target – engine hot • immobile target – engine cold • immobile target - camouflaged • target using optics • critical activities • non-vehicle targets (dismounted infantry and snipers)

  10. Surveillance Area Coyote-12RBC Surveillance Suites Route Cadieux LRESD PC Van Building 543 Canons Anti-aérien C4ISR Mobile Lab Parking Ch D’Appledoorn A1-10

  11. TrainingAreaLRESDISTARExperiment T-Junction Buffin Range Route Cadieux

  12. D G I N T A L L I E S IMINT RECCE HUMINT EW SatCom EWCAC Fused ISTAR/Ops Picture CCIRM Red & Brown SA ISTAR CC A1-12

  13. D G I N T A L L I E S IMINT RECCE HUMINT EW SatCom EWCAC Fused ISTAR/Ops Picture CCIRM Red & Brown SA ISTAR CC A1-13

  14. Lessons learned • Tight integration of ELR CBMS (Coyote Battle Management System) was an issue • Sensor sweeping/switching influence on timeliness • MoPs not suited to measure the ELR Acoustic advantage • Some events are intrinsically hard to detect (e.g., Snipers on movement mission) • New sensors’ impact on Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

  15. Conclusion • COBP was well suited for the LRESD experiment • We did not apply the COBP in its entirety, just the blocks we needed • Assessment Process has a Steep Learning Curve

  16. DREV C4ISR Mobile Laboratory

More Related