200 likes | 374 Views
Evaluating two approaches to the Bio-Optical Model for Coastal Waters. Mimi Szeto Research and Discover Fellow Candidate for UNH MS, Oceanography Advisor: Dr. Janet W. Campbell. Background: Primary Productivity. Phytoplankton. Primary Productivity. Photosynthesis.
E N D
Evaluating two approaches to the Bio-Optical Model for Coastal Waters Mimi Szeto Research and Discover Fellow Candidate for UNH MS, Oceanography Advisor: Dr. Janet W. Campbell
Background: Primary Productivity Phytoplankton Primary Productivity Photosynthesis National Oceanography Centre, Southhampton
Marine Ecosystems Fisheries Oak Ridge National Library Background: The Big Picture The Global Carbon Cycle NOAA MIT
Ocean Color Algorithms The OC4.v4 and OC3M Algorithms at work The SeaWiFS Sensor NASA SeaWiFSProject NASA Bio-Optical Relationship Light <=> Phytoplankton (absorption and scattering) NASA
Ocean Color Algorithms The OC4.v4 and OC3M Algorithms at work The SeaWiFS Sensor NASA SeaWiFSProject NASA Bio-Optical Relationship Light <=> Phytoplankton Inherent Optical Properties (IOP) Apparent Optical Properties (AOP) (absorption and scattering) NASA
AOP Rrs IOP absorption and scattering IN-WATER CONSTITUENTS chlorophyll Bio-Optical Models Semi-Analytical Algorithms Empirical Algorithms
AOP IOP chl Objective: Comparing two approaches to the Bio-Optical Model • Underdog Model: Sydor, 2007 • Popular Model: Gordon, 1988 KEY: IOPs: a = absorption bb= backscattering b=scattering AOP: Rrs= Remote Sensing Reflectance
AOP IOP chl Method • Three different in situ data sets for comparing and sensitivity analysis: • COOA- Gulf of Maine • CalCOFI – Monterey Bay, California • BBOPs – Bermuda • Simulating Datasets: • HYDROLIGHT • in situIOPs modeled rrs • Closure
What I have so far! • Compare plots of in situ data • Rrs vs bb /(a+bb) and Rrs vs b/a • Run COOA IOPs in Hydrolight • Current Problem: too many parameters • WINDSPEED
Showdown: Gordon vs. Sydor Wavelengths 412 443 490 510 555 670
Recap. and Overall Purpose • AOP – IOP : Foundation of semi-analytical algorithms • Main goal: • Reduce uncertainty incurred in ocean color algorithms for coastal regions. • Improve estimate of PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AOP IOP chl
Acknowledgements • Janet Campbell, Ph. D. • Tim Moore, Ph. D. • Research and Discover Fellowship • Jeremy Werdell, GSFC • Joe Salisbury, Ph. D. • Ru Morrison, Ph. D. • Doug Vandemark, Ph. D. • Amanda Plagge, Deb Goodwin, and Shivanesh Rao • COOA and NASA Ocean Color Processing Group
Problem with Wind Speed • Example of one station at different depths.
Objective: Comparing two approaches to the Bio-Optical Model • Component: Sydor, 2007 • Multiple scattering Underdog Equation AOP: Remote sensing Reflectance IOPs: a = absorption bb= backscattering
AOP IOP chl IOPSIn-Water Constituents Remote Sensing Equation ABSORPTION water plankton CDOM and non-algal particles BACKSCATTERING water particles
AOP IOP chl IOPSIn-Water Constituents a or bb = [magnitude] x (spectral shape) WATER CDOM AND NAP PLANKTON 2.5 1.0 0.008 2.0 0.8 0.006 S a*(l) 0.6 1.5 Absorption 0.004 0.4 1.0 0.002 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.000 0.0 600 400 500 600 700 400 500 700 400 500 600 700 Wavelengths Wavelengths Wavelengths