1 / 13

Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe and SPIRAL methodology

Conseil de l‘Europe – Council of Europe. Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe and SPIRAL methodology The different possible ways Division R&D Social Cohesion Salaspils 2 nd and 3 rd February 2012.

senta
Download Presentation

Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe and SPIRAL methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conseil de l‘Europe – Council of Europe Social Cohesion Action Plan of Council of Europe and SPIRAL methodology The different possible ways Division R&D Social Cohesion Salaspils 2nd and 3rdFebruary 2012

  2. Common framework of local processes8 phases for progress in policies/action involving citizens /communities CYCLE OF CONSULTATION CYCLE OF PROGRESS

  3. Threeways for SPIRAL 1- Rapid way:using criteria of well-being at european level • poverty reduction process • analyzing and improving impact of existing policies and actions  Action plan for fighting poverty through coresponsibility 2- Intermediary way: collecting criteria with citizens (HG) • larger implication of citizens – larger scope of pilot actions of co-responsibility • possibility to improve global relevance of policies  Action plan to develop co-responsibility for well-being of all. 3- Deep way:building indicators of progress in well-being • Deep analyze of situation of people in terms of well-being • Possibility to develop individual and collective/ territorial projects of life  Project of Territory of Coresponsibility

  4. Deep way Deep way: Using criteria of ill-being/well-being to build indicators of progress in well-being of all.

  5. Désignation of the degree 1 Very unsatisfactory situation 2 Unsatisfactory situation 3- Medium situation 4 Good situation 5- Ideal situation Satisfactory situation but without having achieved the objective of progress Rethinking how to measure Transversal scale of signification of progress indicators The objective of progress is achieved but without guarantee of sustaina-bility Signification Situation of risk of degradation in chain and/or irreversibi lity The objective of progress is achieved with guarantee of sustaina-bility No satisfactory situation but without short term risk

  6. Désignation of the degree 1 Very unsatisfactory situation 2 Unsatisfactory situation 3- Medium situation 4 Good situation 5- Ideal situation Satisfactory situation but without having achieved the objective of progress Rethinking how to measure Transversal scale of signification of progress indicators The objective of progress is achieved but without guarantee of sustaina-bility Signification The objective of progress is achieved with guarantee of sustaina-bility Situation of risk of degradation in chain and/or irreversibi lity No satisfactory situation but without short term risk

  7. Degrees Very unsatisfac-tory situation 2-Unsatis-factory situation 3- Medium Situation 4- Good situation 5- ideal‏ situation Building indicators of progress in WBA Elaboration of value for every degree Criteria of ill-being/well-being Duple Criteria (negative/positive Scale of values By combinaison of criteria values Validation by citizens

  8. Building indicators of progress in WBA Table 427 – Indicators of progress in well-being – Example of employment Key: No = negative expression of the criterion; Yes = positive expression of the criterion.

  9. Second cycle of consultation and progress CYCLE OF CONSULTATION CYCLE OF PROGRESS

  10. 4- How to develop social cohesion strategy and action plan in Latvia and Estonia

  11. Ideas to be discussed The process began in Salaspils From this experience and other interested towns, may be possible to have a group of pilot towns in Sweden as a basis for a bottom up approach at national level. Council of Europe can give support to do so

  12. Collaborative Website https://spiral.cws.coe.int Access to the concepts for a large public Information on tools and methods for local processes Specificspace for networks Specificspace for working groups on relevant themes (humanrights an poverty, creating jobs by reinforcing social links and social innovation in the public sphere, etc), https://spiral.cws.coe.int

  13. Thank you for your attention https://spiral.cws.coe.int spiral@coe.int samuel.thirion@coe.int fabio.ragonese@coe.int

More Related