170 likes | 264 Views
Giovanni Resta. Douglas M. Blough. Mauro Leoncini. Paolo Santi. Topology Control with better Radio Models Implications for Energy and Multi-Hop Interference. ACM MSWiM ‘05. Outline. Introduction TC for Energy TC for Interference ATASP Topology Simulation Conclusion. Introduction.
E N D
Giovanni Resta Douglas M. Blough Mauro Leoncini Paolo Santi Topology Control with better Radio Models Implications for Energy and Multi-Hop Interference ACM MSWiM ‘05
Outline • Introduction • TC for Energy • TC for Interference • ATASP Topology • Simulation • Conclusion
Introduction • Topology Control • Energy-efficient • Low-interference Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks
TC for Energy tmin + r tmin + r tmax + r Cisco Aironet 4800 card, r = 0.958tmin and tmax = 1.358tmin The minimum-energy path between two nodes always corresponded to a minimum-hop path.
TC for Interference 1. Purely Geometric 2. Multi-hop communications
Example 5 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 3 5
ATASP Topology • All-To-All-Shortest-Path • ATASP has optimal PIC spanning factor • ρ(ATASP) = 1 • ATASP is connected iff G is connected • The communication graph G is composed ofΘ(n2) edges, and its ATASP subgraph is composed ofΘ(n2) edges as well
ATASP Topology 0 1 2 3 6 4 5
Simulation • 10~500 nodes • Distributed uniformly at random in the unit square • Two radio channel models: the quiteidealistic free space propagation model, and the log-normal shadowing model.
Conclusion • In this paper given some model for topology control • Energy • Multi-hop Interference • Open question about the topology control • Interference • Energy • Delay • Throughput