1 / 20

Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying

Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying. How far do you think people will go in the name of obedience?. Where we're at. We have previously discussed Zimbardo’s prison experiment on status and power which now leads onto obedience.

shadow
Download Presentation

Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stanley MilgramA lesson in obeying

  2. How far do you think people will go in the name of obedience?

  3. Where we're at.... • We have previously discussed Zimbardo’s prison experiment on status and power which now leads onto obedience. • Milgram’s work on obedience in1963 extended from Solomon Asch’s line experiment in 1956 on conformity (which we will discuss next Thursday) • Milgram was one of Asch’s critics so due to this and other personal reasons regarding the Nazis he conducted further research in the area. • Who has heard of Milgram’s experiments?

  4. Are Germans different? • In the beginning, Stanley Milgram was worried about the Nazi problem. • His research aim was to provide evidence for the “Germans are different” hypothesis • Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist at Yale University in 1960.

  5. “Germans are different” hypothesis • Milgram set out to test whether Germans have a basic character flaw • A readiness to obey authority without question, no matter what outrageous acts the authority commands. • The hypothesis has been used by historians to explain the systematic destruction of the Jews

  6. Milgram developed a laboratory experiment which provided a systematic way to measure obedience. • His decision to study obedience was tempered by his own Jewish cultural background. • His plan was to test the hypothesis on the population of New Haven on Americans and then go to Germany and test the German population.

  7. Milgram’s experimental design • Milgram recruited participants using a newspaper advert (he did 17 experiments using 40 males between 20-50 and 1 experiment using 40 females between 20-50) • The participants arrived at The Yale Interaction Laboratory and were met by the “professor”, Jack Williams, a man dressed in a white laboratory coat.

  8. The participants met another man who was in his 50s. • The experimenter ‘professor’ explains the experiment to both of them participants: • “It is about learning. Science does not know much about negative reinforcement on learning. Negative reinforcement is getting punished when you get something wrong. In this case, it will be an electric shock.”

  9. Milgram’s Obedience research

  10. Milgram’s experimental design • The experimenter takes two pieces of paper and places them in a hat. The two pieces of paper say “Teacher” and “Learner”. • You and the man in his 50’s reach in to find out what your role is • You look at yours, it says “Teacher”. • The man then becomes the “Learner”.

  11. The experimenter says to the learner whilst you are standing next to him: • “I want you to step right in here and take a seat, please…. Roll up your right sleeve, please. • Now what I want you to do is strap down your arms to avoid excessive movement on your part during the experiment. • This electrode is connected to the shock generator in the next room.”

  12. Milgram’s experimental set-up

  13. Milgram’s Experimental Design • Once set up, the teacher is required to read out a list of words and their pairs. The teacher is then told to read out words and the learner was told to provide the word pair. If the learner gave the wrong answer, the teacher would administer an electric shock. In this way the study was apparently investigating the effect of punishment on memory. • Each time the learner made a mistake, the teacher had to increase the strength of the electric shock. The experimenter sat in the room with the teacher encouraging the teacher to administer the shocks even after the learner cried out in pain and complained of a bad heart.

  14. The Shock Generator (from 15volts to 450volts)

  15. Would Milgram’s participants obey? • What percentage of participants do you believe would obey? • At what voltage would you obey?

  16. Milgram’s result • 65% of Milgram’s participants delivered the full (and fatal) 450 volt shock. (fill in the next two questions on your sheet) • Even though the learner gave out an agonised scream at 285 volts, a refusal to answer at 315 volts and only ominous silence after that. • The learner (50 year old man) in the study was a confederate and no real shocks were given in the experiment except for the 45v example shock given to the teacher • So why did the participants obey? Most participants (teachers) groaned, protested, fidgeted, argued and in some cases, were seized by fits of nerves. Many looked to the experimenter for guidance but he would only reply with: “You have no option, you must go on”.

  17. Killing in the name of…. Gas ovens at Auschwitz (6 million Jews) Rwandan genocide Vietcong deaths

  18. WHY?

  19. Were the Germans different? • The answer is “No”. • Milgram’s experimental results in 1963 provide evidence that atrocities can happen ANYWHERE.

  20. What can we learn?

More Related