1 / 13

Development of the regions of the world economy

Development of the regions of the world economy. dr. Jeney László Senior lecturer jeney@elte.hu. Economic Geography I. International Business bachelor study programme (BA) Spring term 201 5 /201 6 . CUB Centre of Economic Geography and Futures Studies.

shadrick
Download Presentation

Development of the regions of the world economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of the regions of the world economy dr. Jeney László Senior lecturer jeney@elte.hu Economic Geography I. International Business bachelor study programme (BA) Spring term 2015/2016. CUB Centre of Economic Geography and Futures Studies

  2. Definition and characteristics of worldeconomy 2

  3. Evolution and actors of worldeconomy • Modern world economy developed by a long historical evolution • The appearance of world market: • 15th–16thcentury(at the Age of Discovery): theappearanceofonlytheworld market • 18th–19th century (at the age of classical capitalism): the appearance worldeconomy • Atthesametimewiththeapprearanceof national economy • The essence is derived from the capitalist social formations • A system with more actors • National economies: oldiestactors • Transnational companies (tnc) • International organizations: newestactors

  4. Similarconcepts • World economy > aggregate of nationaleconomies • Internationalizationof forces of production • More effectiveallocation of resources • Global problemscan be solvedonlyonthislevel (more and more questionsariseswhatshould be internationallydealt) • Processes of worldeconomydeterminestheonesofnationaleconomies • World economy > world market ( only the interactions among the national economies) • World economy < world system ( system of ethnical, cultural, military relations as well)

  5. Universalitybutdiversity GDP of the countries of the World (on ppp), 2015. Source: Worldmapper • A world-wideeconomic unit of themankind • Even if hundred millions don’t integrated to the circulation • False statement: coexistence of a capitalist and a socialist world economies and world markets • Unified world market: connects with similar relations systems with different development • Main character of the contemporary world economy: diversity • Lowest 25% of the countries: GNP per capita < 500 $ • Highest 10% of the countries: GNP per capita > 20000 $ • Informational society (internet)  caravan routes • (Post-)modern  traditional pre-capitalist organizations • Conflicts instead of peaceful coexistence

  6. Main characteristics of theglobalcore–peripheryrelationship 6

  7. Wallerstein: theory of core–periphery • Wallerstein: newtheoreticalsystem: world economy forms an organic whole • Determinedsocio–economicstructure • The extremepoles: coresand peripheries • Core: action centre of fields, growth poles, hegemonic country at the top (West-Eu, USA, Japan) • Semi-Periphery: on the inner margin • Periphery: on the outer margin • Rostow, Friedman: theory of economic growth

  8. Historicallychangingcores and peripheries • Cores and peripheriesexisted even before the appearance of the world economy (classical capitalism) • But: the achievement of the relationship only later • Historically changing, but reproductive shaped not predestination • More core appeared and disappeared along the history (e.g. Egypt, Mesopotamia) • The catching-up was successful by more peripheries (e.g. NorthAmerica, Japan, Southeast Asia)

  9. Historicallychangingcores and peripheries • The falling behind means other results at different ages • Being CoreorPeripeherymatterssince the evolution of the formation of capitalist production, the world economy (sincethenitbecameimportant) • Core–periphery relationship evolved in more dimensions: economic and political  determines the international factors of trade • Asymetricmutual interdependence • Mutual: action centre and gravity zone: different efficiency advantages specialization of national economies world wide specialization • Asymmetric: the extents of dependence, advantages of specialization are not equal

  10. Core–periphery • Power of Core derives from its higher development • Its interest: the establishment of the asymmetric dependence (e.g. military, assimilation, trading relations) • Core–periphery relationship: connection of the power centres evolved in large economic macroregions and their gravity zones • Characteristic economic macroregions: America, Europe–Africa, Far East • The relations of the action centres to each other is also changing  the spatial structure/pattern of world economy also changes

  11. Economicgeographicdivision of the World Classic – 5 continents (Europe, Asia, America, Africa, Australia-Oceania) World economicposition: 2 (Brandt line: North and South) or 3 units(Core, Semi-Periphery, Periphery) Macroregions of theworldeconomy – 3 units: America, Europe-Africa, Far East Culturalregions 11

  12. Economic core regions • Other definitions: • Global North • Triad (North America, Europe, East Asia) + Australia • Appearance as core region: • Europe: from the Age of Discoveries and the industrial revolution • North America, Australia: from the late 19th century • Japan: from the 1960s (famous ancient East Asian cultures) • Its state of development: in the forefront of the age • Its development is autonomic and organic • Self-modernization: derived from the inner structure and the inner motivation of the society • Recognition of natural and human rules  getting the new resources  ensure a more higher state of satisfaction of needs

  13. Economicperipheries • Falls behind the state of development of Core • Does not move on an organic and autonomic pathway • Periphery: lagging structure  dependent position, acceptance of asymmetric relations • Delinking from the world is not alternative • Its development based on copy of more developed systems evolved under other circumstances copied  following samples • Question: are the copied samples able to be organic, to dynamize the whole structure?

More Related