1 / 26

Passive acoustic detection of right, fin and humpback whales in the eastern Bering Sea

Passive acoustic detection of right, fin and humpback whales in the eastern Bering Sea. David K. Mellinger 1,2 , Kate Stafford 3 , Sue E. Moore 2 , Sharon L. Nieukirk 1,2 , Sara L. Heimlich 1,2 , Phyllis J. Stabeno 2. 1 Oregon State University

shaeleigh-cross
Download Presentation

Passive acoustic detection of right, fin and humpback whales in the eastern Bering Sea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Passive acoustic detection of right, fin and humpback whales in the eastern Bering Sea David K. Mellinger1,2, Kate Stafford3, Sue E. Moore2, Sharon L. Nieukirk1,2, Sara L. Heimlich1,2, Phyllis J. Stabeno2 1 Oregon State University 2 NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory 3 University of Washington UW

  2. Background • Little is known about year-round occurrence of large cetaceans in the Bering Sea • Why do we care? • ecologists: most are top predators • managers: some are endangered species • social scientists: some are culturally vital • We focus here on three species: • right whale – highly endangered • fin whale – very common, ecologically important • humpback whale – also common, ecologically important • This talk is on data analysis

  3. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  4. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  5. Survey method • Passive acoustics is a good approach for long-term surveys • “passive” means just listening, not emitting sonar sounds • we can distinguish baleen whale and seal sounds • not limited by weather, time of day or year, sea state, etc. • Seafloor instruments can record sound continuously for more than one year • continuous monitoring with only one instrument turnaround per year • relatively low cost

  6. St. Lawrence I. St. Matthew I. M5 M4 M2 Pribilof Is. Bering Sea survey • Passive acoustic survey conducted in 2006-07 • also in 2007 and later, but only the first year is covered here • Three sites in southeastern Bering Sea • locations of PMEL’s (Phyllis Stabeno’s) long-term oceanographic moorings M2, M4, M5 • these moorings made this project possible

  7. Piles of data • What do we do with three instrument-years (390 GBytes) of recordings? • potentially millions of whale calls • Answer: automate the first stage(s) of analysis • detect calls of the three species right humpback fin

  8. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  9. Detecting right whale calls • Right whale (Eubalaena japonica) • very rare species; perhaps 25 in the eastern Bering Sea population • Right whale ‘up’ call • common call, believed to be a contact call • made by both males and females • fairly stereotyped – calls are similar, but not exactly alike • Detection method: spectrogram correlation • synthetic kernel correlated with normalized spectrogram • kernel is designed to reject interfering noise • kernel parameters were measured from a small number of calls

  10. Detecting right whale up calls * = detection threshold

  11. Detection, continued • For a rare species like the right whale, want to use a low detectionthreshold • prevents missing too many calls • but results in many wrong detections • Checkthe detections • aural inspection (listening) plus visual inspection of spectrograms • diagram of keeping 1, tossing 3 calls

  12. St. Lawrence I. St. Matthew I. M5 M4 M2 Pribilof Is. Results: right whale detection • 151 total hours with calls, mostly in summer/fall 2006 • none at M5 Right whale calling hours/day with calls 2006 2007 M5: Ø

  13. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  14. Detecting fin whale calls • Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) • common species, heard nearly continuously in late summer and early fall • hundreds of thousands of calls • Calls are not as stereotyped • frequency varies from one call to the next • bandwidth varies from one call to the next • There can be a lot of noise in their frequency band

  15. Detecting fin whale calls • Detection method: Don’t count calls; just measure sound energy in their frequency band • Have to eliminate energy from other noise sources in the band • Use a noise-corrected estimate of energy • correction factor comes from adjacent frequency bands 80th-percentile value in ‘guard’ frequency range g0 – g1

  16. Example: fin whale detection

  17. St. Lawrence I. St. Matthew I. M5 M4 M2 Pribilof Is. Results: fin whale detection BS-M5 BS-M4 BS-M2

  18. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  19. Detecting humpback whale calls • Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae): • fairly common species, heard often in late summer and early fall • Highly variable calls • cover a wide frequency range (50-2000+ Hz) • too wide to use energy sum – too many other species present in the band

  20. Detecting humpback whale calls • Detection method: Find all “moans” (tone-like) sounds in a limited frequency range • can use an algorithm originally developed for dolphin whistles • Check detection accuracy manually (work in progress) • estimate the false-detection rate and the missed-call rate

  21. St. Lawrence I. St. Matthew I. M5 M4 M2 Pribilof Is. Results: humpback whale detections • Results shown for times when no ice was present • prevents bearded seal interference M5 M4 M2

  22. Overview • Background • passive acoustics • study area • Right whale detection • Fin whale detection • Humpback whale detection • Conclusion • future work

  23. Conclusions • Passive acoustics works for detecting these three species • different call-detection methods needed for each species • sometimes need correction factors • But there are limitations • animals must call to be heard • we get an index of occurrence • would be nice to relate this to spatial whale density • this is especially difficult for summer baleen whales • Good to have year-round data (over several years) on these top predators

  24. What’s next? • Develop correction factors for humpbacks • measure wrong-detection rate and missed-call rate in each month • correct the detection curves using these factors • Check fin call index • do we need correction factors for fins too? • Detect right whale “gunshot” vocalizations, other species

  25. What’s next? • Understand the results: relate inter-mooring differences in whale occurrence to physical (temperature, ice, currents) and biological (chl a, zooplankton, etc.) data • develop predictive models - see talk by Stabeno et al., poster by Stafford et al. in-situ temp M5 M4 M2 satellite surface temperature % ice chl a

  26. The End • Thanks to NPRB (#518 and #719) and the Office of Naval Research for funding • Thanks to Haru Matsumoto, Bob Dziak, and PMEL’s mooring shop for assistance designing, building, and deploying hydrophone instruments • Thanks to Susan Parks for assistance with right whale calls

More Related