190 likes | 335 Views
Reply to the HARP-CDP group V. Uzhinsky, CERN and LIT JINR.
E N D
Some natural questions arise at a reading of the paper: 1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions and in the interactions of hadrons with heavy nuclei?; 2) Is there any dependence of the structure on the interaction energy or on the multiplicity of produced particles?;3) Has the resonance decay any influence on the structure?, and so on? They are not considered in the paper. • Geant4 hadronic models: • The low energy parameterized model (LEP, Gheisha); • The high energy parameterized model (HEP, Gheisha); • The binary cascade model (BIC); • The Bertini model (BERT); • The quark-gluon string model (QGS); • The Fritiof model (FTF). All of them were studied!
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? Yes! LEP, LEPAR, Gheisha π+
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? Yes! HEP, HEPAR, Gheisha π+
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? LEP, HEP (LEPAR, HEPAR = Gheisha) program code Yes! • Program steps: • Sampling of multiplicity of produced particles; • Sampling of Pt of the particles; • Sampling of Xf of the particles. geant4-09-01-ref-02/source/processes/hadronic/models/low_energy/src/ CVS G4LEKaonZeroInelastic.cc G4LCapture.cc G4LELambdaInelastic.cc G4LEAlphaInelastic.cc G4LElastic.cc G4LEAntiKaonZeroInelastic.cc G4LENeutronInelastic.cc G4LEAntiLambdaInelastic.cc G4LEOmegaMinusInelastic.cc G4LEAntiNeutronInelastic.cc G4LEPionMinusInelastic.cc G4LEAntiOmegaMinusInelastic.cc G4LEPionPlusInelastic.cc G4LEAntiProtonInelastic.cc G4LEProtonInelastic.cc G4LEAntiSigmaMinusInelastic.cc G4LEProtonInelastic.cc~ G4LEAntiSigmaPlusInelastic.cc G4LESigmaMinusInelastic.cc G4LEAntiXiMinusInelastic.cc G4LESigmaPlusInelastic.cc G4LEAntiXiZeroInelastic.cc G4LETritonInelastic.cc G4LEDeuteronInelastic.cc G4LEXiMinusInelastic.cc G4LEKaonMinusInelastic.cc G4LEXiZeroInelastic.cc G4LEKaonPlusInelastic.cc G4LFission.cc No! geant4-09-01-ref-02/source/processes/hadronic/util/src CVS G4HadSignalHandler.cc G4ReactionDynamics.cc~ G4Bessel.cc G4HadTmpUtil.cc G4ReactionDynamics.ccPrint G4HadFinalState.cc G4IsoResult.cc G4ReactionKinematics.cc G4HadProjectile.cc G4LightMedia.cc G4ReactionProduct.cc G4HadronicWhiteBoard.cc G4Nucleus.cc G4StableIsotopes.cc G4HadSecondary.cc G4ReactionDynamics.cc Yes! while( ++innerCounter < 7 ) { ran = G4UniformRand()*dndl[19]; l = 1; while( ( ran >= dndl[l] ) && ( l < 20 ) )l++; l = std::min( 19, l ); // x = std::min( 1.0, pt*(binl[l-1] + G4UniformRand()*(binl[l]-binl[l-1])/2.) ); //Uzhi x = std::min( 1.0, pt*(binl[l-1] + G4UniformRand()*(binl[l]-binl[l-1]) ) ); //Uzhi Here it is!
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? BERT, Bertini’s model There is a problem with baryon spectra!
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? BIC, binary cascade model There can be a problem with baryon spectra!
1) Is the structure appearing in the hadron-hadron interactions? RPG There can be a problem with baryon spectra!
Is the structure appearing in the interactions of hadrons with heavy nuclei? LEPAR Yes! The same source of the structure!
LHEP Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x Fig. 11 Fig. 5a π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 5b Fig. 11 P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x We know the source!
QGSC Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x Fig. 6a π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 6b (effect of LEPAR) P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x
QGSP-BERT Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x Fig. 7b π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 7a P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x
QGSP-BIC Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 8b Fig. 8a P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x ?, LEP is used instead of BIC!
Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper QBBC=QGSM+QEL+CHIPS+BIC P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x Fig. 9a (effect of CHIP?) ? π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 9b P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x
FTFP Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper P+Be -> p +x π+Be -> p +x Fig. 10a (effect of no FM) π+Be -> π+ +x P+Be -> π+ +x Fig. 10b P+Be -> π- +x π+Be -> π- +x
Page 14 Once more trhough the HARP-CDP paper Question: why “shape” Is assumed as bad one? What is a criteria? There Is no stable exp. data.
Conclusion • Bug in LEP and HEP is fixed. • Fermi-motion is included. • The question is closed! Lesson: Monte Carlo data must be analyzed as An experimental data. Physical thought must Work!