150 likes | 304 Views
Comparative Performance Measurement Highlights. And Standing Committee on Performance Management Task Force Update October 2009 Mara Campbell Organizational Results Director Missouri Department of Transportation. A Road is a Road. How States Differ. Climate Population Topography
E N D
Comparative Performance Measurement Highlights And Standing Committee on Performance Management Task Force Update October 2009 Mara Campbell Organizational Results Director Missouri Department of Transportation
How States Differ • Climate • Population • Topography • Organizational structure • State economies
Construction Project Cost & Schedule Performance • Focused on knowledge sharing, • Based on rigorous measurement methodologies, • Designed to minimize additional data collection, and • Reported to protect DOTs from unfair scrutiny.
Construction Project Cost & Schedule Performance • A total of 20 states participated • Significant buy-in to the process • 28 best practices from nine states!
Pavement Smoothness Performance • A total of 32 states participated • 12 high-performing states identified • Five agency best practices and four contractor best practices
Highway Safety Performance • Fatalities Accident Reporting System data • Best practices identified in governance, budgeting and technical methods
New Projects Underway • Bridge Conditions has 35 states participating • Incident Management still in the process of soliciting states
Lessons Learned • It can be done! • Common definitions are a must • States do benefit from comparative performance measures • Comparative performance measures can identify best practices
Next Steps • Continue to elevate the importance of comparative performance measures. • Continue to spotlight best practices among high-performers. • Launch more comparative performance measures.
Thank You!For more information, contact: Mara Campbell Missouri Department of Transportation (573) 526-2908mara.campbell@modot.mo.gov