1 / 22

S tate I mprovement G rant A dequate Y early P rogress SIG-AYP

This report summarizes the past year's progress and presents the plan for the upcoming year for the State Improvement Grant (SIG-AYP). It includes details about planning meetings, summer institutes, teacher visitations, and collaboration between general education and special education. The report also highlights the focus on Michigan GLCEs, instructional materials alignment, and the development of diagnostic inventories and intervention lessons. The plan for the next year includes sustaining and replicating program components, developing instructional sequences, and providing intervention lessons in numeration, whole numbers, fractions, and decimals. The project aims to support teachers of underachieving students and special education students who will take the MEAP test.

shelleyj
Download Presentation

S tate I mprovement G rant A dequate Y early P rogress SIG-AYP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State Improvement GrantAdequate Yearly ProgressSIG-AYP A Report of the Past Year (2004-5) and The Plan for this Year (2005-6)

  2. A Report of the Past Year (2004-5) • Planning Meetings (734) • March 2004 at E Lansing Hannah Bldg., • Summer Institutes (2) • July 12-16, 2004 at Saginaw ISD • July 26-30, 2004 at Wayne County RESA • Follow-up Conference • Saturday October 16, 2004 at Clinton County RESA (planning sessions) • One Day GLCE Conferences (2) • Saturday December 4, 2004 at Wayne County RESA • Wednesday January 12, 2005 at Henry Ford CC Technology Center • School Visitations (2 per building)

  3. Original Model • In-Depth Instruction on One Strand in the Form of Summer Institutes • Follow-Up to Schools the Subsequent School Year • Providing Resource Materials for Teachers • General Ed. and Special Ed. Collaboration • Administrator/Teacher Teams

  4. One-week Summer Institutes • Overview of the Michigan GLCEs • Two Formats (Grade & Strand) • State Assessment Expectations • Instructional Materials Alignment Analysis • Instructional and Assessment Vocabulary • Resource CD • GLCE files, Graphics, Analysis, Vocabulary

  5. One-week Summer Institutes • Sample instructional activities • Numeration/Place Value • Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, and Division of Whole Numbers • Fraction Concepts and Operations • Decimal Concepts and Operations

  6. What We Learned • More Time and Depth on the GLCEs • Curriculum Based Assessments Needed within Number Strand • Linkage between Assessment Data and IEP Development • Instructional Sequencing of Topics Across Grade Levels • Instructional Activities that Map to Instructional Sequences and Assessments • Modeling Use of Various Representations to Develop Conceptual Understanding • Infusing Model Instructional Units into Existing Curricula

  7. Wayne County RESA Kalamazoo Valley RESA Genesee ISD Saginaw ISD Washtenaw ISD Muskegon ISD Kent ISD Oakland Schools Marquette-Alger ISD Grand Traverse Bay ISD Informational SessionsMay and June 2005

  8. Summer 2005 • Pilot Testing • 2nd Cadre Wayne County RESA Conference (2 sessions) • 1st Cadre Wayne County RESA Conference • Finalize Diagnostic Tests and Interpretations of Test Results • Draft IEP

  9. The Plan for Spring and School Year (2005-6) • Instructional Sequences • Diagnostic Tests • Intervention Lessons • Sustain and Replicate

  10. Three Program Components Diagnostic Inventories Instructional Sequence Instructional Planning

  11. Instructional Sequences • Number and Numeration • Whole Number • Fraction • Decimal • Measurement • Geometry • Algebra • Data and Probability

  12. Three Instructional Components Symbolic / Number Verbal / Words Concrete Pictorial Manipulatives

  13. Diagnostic Inventories • Numeration and Place Value • Whole Number • Fraction • Decimal • Measurement

  14. Numeration and Place Value Inventory • Contextual Problems • Concept • Number (Position and Quantity) • Place Value • Representations (models and symbol) • Counting Forward and Backward • Comparing • Word/Numeral Translations

  15. Whole Number Inventory • Concept of the Operation in Context • Pictorial Representation of the Operation • Using the Number Line to Compute • Fact Families, Inverse Operations, and Identities • Computation Format • Computation • Facts • With and Without Regrouping (Embedded Zeros) • Multiple Digits (Up to 4 – Digit)

  16. Fractions Inventory: Basic Level • Concept • Equal Partitioning • The Role of Numerator and Denominator • The Whole as the Referent • Translate among Representations (models and symbol) • Counting • Reading and Writing Fraction Words and Numerals • Equivalence, Comparison, and Ordering • Basic Computation (Like Denominators)

  17. Decimals Inventory: Basic Level • Concept • Equal Partitioning • The Role of Zero and the Decimal Point • Decimal Place Value and Trading • Translate among Representations (models and symbol) • Counting • Reading and Writing Decimal Words and Numerals • Equivalence, Comparison, and Ordering • Basic Computation (Tenths and Hundredths – No Regrouping)

  18. Intervention Lessons • Numeration/Place Value • Whole number Concepts and Operations • Fraction Concepts and Operations • Decimal Concepts and Operations

  19. Sustain and Replicate • Continue with Current Districts • Service • Materials • Develop a Service Network • Provide Information • Solicit Additional Districts

  20. Project Focus • Teachers of Underachieving Students • Special Education Students Who Will Take the MEAP Test • Continuing Support • Diagnosis of Student Performance • Implications for the IEP • Instructional Interventions • Assessment of Impact

  21. Concluding Comments • We are humbled by the excitement, interest and participation in the project • Teachers have taken their own initiative to create regional teams • The model has been well received

More Related