300 likes | 362 Views
Knee lecture course, Prague 2007. Clinical, biomechanical, and biological factors to achieve deep flexion in TKA. Kazunori Yasuda, MD, PhD Department of Sports Medicine & Joint Surgery Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. ROM after TKA.
E N D
Knee lecture course, Prague 2007 Clinical, biomechanical, and biological factors to achieve deep flexion in TKA Kazunori Yasuda, MD, PhD Department of Sports Medicine & Joint Surgery Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
ROM after TKA • Commonly limited to 100 to 110 degrees • Acceptable to perform Western daily activities • Patients in Asia and the Middle East hope for a deep flexion of 140 degrees or more after TKA • Needed to continue their usual life-style
Deep flexion after TKA • Recently, deep knee flexion is required increasingly for patients in Europe and North America • Frequently needed to pursue their quality of life, • Sitting on the floor • Squatting for gardening • Playing light sports • Thus, the issue of deep flexion after TKA has attracted much notice
The fundamental base-line in considering deep flexion • The 2 greatest effects of TKA should not be disturbed • Pain relief • Restoration of walking ability • Surgeons should not create unstable knees in order to obtain deep knee flexion • Knee instability disturbs walking ability
What degree is deep flexion for the knee with TKA? • The real deep flexion means 140 degrees or more • In my clinical practice • The average ROM after TKA: 125 degrees. • Very difficult to improve this value to 140 degrees hereafter • Many surgeons are worried about the average ROM of 100 degrees after TKA • Easier for the surgeons to improve the average ROM from 100 degrees to 120 degrees, using current knowledge and techniques
A focus on my talk • How should we do to obtain the average ROM of 120 degrees after TKA? • If it will be achieved, about 10 % of patients will perform the real deep flexion without any instability Postop. 4 wks
The fundamental principle to simultaneously obtain deep flexion and knee stability • In the normal knee • The beautiful matching between the shape of the 2 bone surfaces and the functions of the ligament and tendon tissues allows for deep flexion of the knee • In the knee that obtained deep flexion after TKA • We can find similarity between the 2 knees
To obtain deep flexion and knee stability after TKA • Surgeons should simultaneously restore the normal soft tissue functions and the anatomical joint surface • Ideal soft tissue release • Anatomical shaped prosthesis • This is difficult, but the only way
Examples • Previously, resection of the posterior condyle was recommended • To create a sufficient flexion-gap • Recently sufficient posterior condylar offset is recommended • To avoid the insert impingement • What should we learn from this history • A sufficient flexion-gap should not be created by bone resection, but by soft tissue release • Then, an anatomical design is essential for obtaining deep flexion
Factors disturbing deep flexion • Clinically, many factors may strongly disturb the restoration of the normal soft tissue functions and the anatomical joint surface • Preoperative factors • Intra-operative factors • Postoperative factors
The preoperative factors • Shortening of the extensor apparatus • Patella baja • Quadriceps contracture • Contracture of the ligaments and capsular tissues
Shortening of the extensor apparatus • Extremely difficult to be treated • Some surgical ideas have been proposed to lengthen the extensor apparatus • Quadriceps lengthening • Tibial tubercle transfer • Bone resection • Special prosthetic design • Each idea has their own set of serious complications • This remains unsolved at the present time • In these cases, surgeons cannot expect much improvement in the ROM after surgery
PCL contracture Soft-tissue contracture • Collateral contracture • Well treated during surgery with the tissue-release (Technique will be shown later) • PCL contracture • The most difficult to be treated with the tissue-release technique • In knees having severe contracture, a posterior-stabilizing prosthesis is recommended
Intra-operative factors • Various technical failures by surgeons • Insufficient release of the soft tissues having contracture • Incorrect bone resection • Mal-position of component • Mismatch of the component design to the original knee • Insufficient resection of the posterior bony spur • These are the most important for surgeons • Because these factors depend on surgeon’s skill
Possible technical failure: #1 • A case that the distal femur was resected too much • Ligament function is normal due to perfect tissue release • Note that the flexion gap is normal • If a surgeon choose an appropriate insert for the flexion gap • Significant instability in the extension position • Then, If the surgeon changes the insert to a thicker one to treat the instability • Significant loss of flexion
Possible technical failure: #2 • A case that the posterior capsule contracture was not sufficiently released • The knee is apparently stable in the full extension position because of the tight posterior capsule • But collateral ligs are relaxed • When the knee is flexed (the posterior capsule is relaxed) • Significant instability • Then, if the surgeon places a thicker insert to treat the instability • Loss of both extension and flexion
Take home message • Inappropriate bone resection cannot be compensated by soft tissue releasing • Insufficient soft tissue release cannot be compensated by bone resection • Recent trend • Precise bone resection can be easily navigated by specially designed instruments • However, soft tissue release remains the most critical in TKA • Several releasing techniques
My step-release procedure (For the CR-type prosthesis) • The first step • Release from the tibia • M and PM part of the menisco-tibial ligament • Deep layer of the MCL • Completely remove a tibial bone block after carefully releasing from the PCL • Check the ligament balance
My step-release procedure (For the CR-type prosthesis) • The second step • Release from the tibia • Semi-membranosus tendon • Only the proximal part of the tibial attachment of the PCL • Again check the ligament balance
My step-release procedure (For the CR-type prosthesis) • The third step (for the severe varus knees) • Release from the tibia • The proximal one-third of the superficial layer of the MCL, preserving the distal part
My step-release procedure (For the PS-type prosthesis) • Warning • If the PCL is finally resected after the collateral release, the knee frequently become unstable • For severe varus deformity or flexion contracture • Resect the PCL first • Then, gradually perform from the first step
“High-flexion” designs • Biomechanical factors affecting the postoperative ROM • Loss of roll-back movement of the femur • Tibial slope • Narrow flexion gap • Loss of the posterior condyle offset • Shortening of the extensor mechanism • Loss of internal rotation of the tibia • Prosthetic designs to improve each biomechanical factor • PCL-substitution • Insert/osteotomy with the tibial slope • Short posterior offset • Long posterior offset • Deep patellar groove • Mobile tibial insert
“High-flexion” designs? • No doubt that each improvement in the design is biomechanically important • Clinically, however, - - - • “Can surgeons significantly improve the average ROM by using a new design in their clinical practice?” • Commonly speaking, prospective randomized clinical trials have showed no significant differences between previous and new prosthetic designs • Aigner et al: JBJS-Am, 2004 • A-P griding mobile bearing vs. Conventional mobile • 113 degrees vs. 111 degrees (NS)
Do any “High-flexion” designs significantly improve the ROM? • It may be difficult for surgeons to easily achieve deep flexion by changing a prosthetic design • Commonly speaking, the degree of the design change is minimal. • The pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors strongly affect the postoperative ROM • Again, surgeons should make effort to restore the normal ligament functions and the anatomical joint shape, using surgeons’ skill
Post-operative factors • Using the soft release technique, we can obtain deep flexion during surgery in almost all cases • Except for cases with the extensor contracture • Nevertheless, these knees frequently fail to obtain deep flexion due to the following postoperative biological factors • Postoperative arthrofibrosis • Postoperative contracture of the extensor apparatus
Postoperative rehabilitation • Only a method to minimize effects of the postoperative biological factors at the present time • The effect of the standard rehabilitation varies among the individuals • The effect of aggressive rehabilitation commonly disappears over time
Postperative arthrofibrosis and contracture • The most critical factors to obtain deep flexion after TKA at the present time • Onodera, Yasuda, et al: TORS, 2006 • Expression of TGF-beta and EMMPRIN within the knee joint after TKA are significantly correlated with the postoperative ROM • In the future • We may have to clarify these biological mechanisms and to develop useful methods to control them • If we hope to obtain the real deep flexion in all cases
Conclusions • To obtain deep flexion in the artificial knee, we should simultaneously restore the normal ligament balance and the anatomical joint surface • Clinically, however, pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors may strongly disturb the restoration, resulting in loss of ROM • Both precise soft tissue release and bone resection are the most essential for surgeons • The postoperative arfthrofibrosis and contracture are the most critical to obtain deep flexion • In the future, we should develop useful methods to control these postoperative biological responses within the living body
Acknowledgement Thank you