840 likes | 1.1k Views
DISEASE UPDATE 04 Paul E. Bertrand. SPOTTED WILT. TILLAGE TRANSPLANTS ADMIRE ACTIGARD. TILLAGE. FIELD WEEDS. WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE. WHEAT (GRASSES) AS A TSWV SOURCE. 1 . MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV .
E N D
SPOTTED WILT • TILLAGE • TRANSPLANTS • ADMIRE • ACTIGARD
TILLAGE FIELD WEEDS
WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE 1.MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV.
WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE 1.MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2.WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST.
TSWV ACQUIRED FOR TRANSMISSION ONLY BY JUVENILES and ---
TSWV NECESSARY JUVENILE STAGE EXISTS ONLY 12 - 15 HRS. so ---
TSWV TO TRANSMIT TSWV LATER THRIPS MUST HATCH ON OR NEAR INFECTED PLANTS
WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE 1.MOST THRIPS LEAVING WHEAT ARE CEREAL THRIPS WHICH DO NOT TRANSMIT TSWV. 2. WHEAT IS NOT A TSWV HOST. 3.TOBACCO THRIPS HATCHED ON WHEAT HAVE NO OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE TSWV.
IN FIELD WEED MANAGEMENT
IN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT • CLEAN ROWS • WEEDY ROWS • WHEAT ROWS
IN FIELD WEEDMANAGEMENT • 2 ROW • 4 ROW • 8 ROW TOBACCO
2004 EARLY WEEDS SUMNER: 42/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 58/90 ELISA+
EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVER
EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVER
EFFECT OF COVER ON SPOTTED WILT NEXT TO COVER
WHEAT SUMNER: 0/90 ELISA+ GRINER: 0/90 ELISA+
REDISTRIBUTION OF ADULT THRIPS FROM WHEAT ?
SUMNER FARM % TSWV ROW FROM COVER
GRINER FARM % TSWV ROW FROM COVER
WHEAT (GRASSES)AS A TSWV SOURCE 1.NOT A SOURCE but 2.CAN PLAY A ROLE
TILLAGE STRIP TILL
RESULTS % TSWV but---
2004 LITTER LEFT STANDING
LAY BY LITTER CUT OUT 5 WEEKS POST TP
2004 RESULTS % TSWV
ARE THE PLANTS THEMSELVES DIFFERENT ?
HOUSE vs BED PLANTS • 9 SOURCES OF PLANTS • COLLECTED THE SAME DAY • GROWN AT 2 LOCATIONS • SET THE SAME DAY • ADMIRE 2.0 oz /1,000 (TPW)
HOUSE 0 - 1 % INFECTED TRANSPLANTS 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANT
HOUSE 0 - 1 % BED 0 % INFECTED TRANSPLANTS 2/5 LOTS HAD ONE ELISA+ PLANT
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWV
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWV
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND
EXPECTED RESULTS • BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS • SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIRE
UNEXPECTED RESULTS • MORE INFECTED HOUSE PLANTS • MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWV
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % TSWV
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND
EFFECT OF PLANT SOURCE % STAND
2004 RESULTSSIMILAR TO 2003 • MORE TSWV WITH HOUSE PLANTS • BETTER RESPONSE TO TPW ADMIRE WITH HOUSE PLANTS • SOME STAND LOSS WITH BED PLANTS & TPW ADMIRE