230 likes | 252 Views
Integrated quality loss through Taguchi's SN ratios for optimal adjustment factor determination and multi-response problem guidelines. Procedure emphasizes finding adjustment factors.
E N D
No.1 • (Worse) Integration of quality loss for responses is made with the proposed method through the application of Taguchi's SN ratios. • (Better) The proposed method integrates quality loss for responses by applying Taguchi's SN ratios.
No.2 • (Worse)The variability is reduced when the scale of the quality loss is normalized. • (Better) Normalizing the scale of the quality loss reduces the variability.
No.3 • (Worse) Determination of the optimal factor/level combination is made in the following procedure. • (Better) The following procedure determines the optimal factor/level combination.
No.4 • (Worse) There is no significant effect on MRSN by any factor. • (Better) No factor significantly affects MRSN.
No.5 • (Worse) Guidelines in which the optimal adjustment factors in a multi-response problem are determined are presented in the above section. • (Better) The above section presents guidelines for determining the optimal adjustment factors in a multi-response problem.
No.6 • (Worse) Necessary trade-offs should be made when choosing suitable adjustment factors. • (Better) Engineers should make necessary trade-offs when choosing suitable adjustment factors.
No.7 • (Worse) The task in which the optimal adjustment factors are determined becomes more complicated when multiple characteristics exist. • (Better) Multiple characteristics complicate the task of determining the optimal adjustment factors.
No.8 • (Worse) That an adjustment factor must be found is of heavy emphasis in the conventional scheme. • (Better) The conventional scheme heavily emphasizes finding an adjustment factor.
[Note 2.15] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, obtaining, deriving, attaining, locatingand identifyingcan be used as alternatives to findingwhen the Chinese meaning is 尋找.
No.9 • (Worse) There is only a slight effect on MRSN by Factor D, but a significant effect on the average of DT -response. • (Better) Although slightly affecting MRSN, Factor D significantly affects the average of DT -response.
No.10 • (Worse) Six controllable factors were identified in their study. • (Better) Their study identified six controllable factors.
No.11 • (Worse) Improvement in thickness uniformity is made with the optimization procedure proposed herein. • (Better)The optimization procedure proposed herein improves the thickness uniformity.
[Note 2.16] • To increase word variety in a sentence, enhances, upgrades, and elevatescan be used instead of always saying improveswhen the Chinese meaning is改善.
No.12 • (Worse)Computation of the quality loss, determination of the multi-response signal to noise ratio, and verfication of the experimental results are achieved by the procedure. • (Better)The procedure computes the quality loss, determines the multi-response signal to noise ratio, and verifies the experimental results.
No.13 • (Worse) Easy adjustment of the importance of each response can be made by the proposed procedure. • (Better) The proposed procedure can easily adjust the importance of each response.
[Note 2.17] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, adjust, alter, modify, and varycan be used as alternatives to change when the Chinese meaning is 改變 .
No.14 • (Worse) Conventional approaches for analysis of censored data are often difficult to be comprehended by practitioners. • (Better) Practitioners often have difficulty in comprehending conventional approaches for analyzing censored data.
[Note 2.18] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, comprehend, perceive, and understandcan be used as alternatives to realizewhen the Chinese meaning is瞭解 . • Similarly, depending on the sentence‘s context, elucidateand clarifycan be used as alternatives to make clearwhen the Chinese meaning is弄清楚 .
No.15 • (Worse)Feasible factor/level settings are usually determined by engineers so that product quality can be enhanced. • (Better) Engineers usually determine feasible factor/level settings to enhance product quality.
No.16 • (Worse) Analysis of the variables is impossible by the current system. • (Better) The current system can not analyze the variables.
No.17 • (Worse)Announcement of the deadline is required by the organizing committee so that sufficient time to prepare the materials is allowed. • (Better)The organizing committee must announce the deadline to allow sufficient time to prepare the materials.
No.18 • (Worse)Fluctuation in the speed can be performed by the experimenter so that accurate calibration of the machine is ensured. • (Better)The experimenter can fluctuate the speed to calibrate the machine accurately.