290 likes | 400 Views
De sktop G rids for I nternational S cientific Co llaboration. APPLICATION OF DESKTOP GRID TECHNOLOGY IN MATERIAL SCIENCE. A.Gatsenko , A.Baskova , Yu.Gordienko G.V.Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.
E N D
Desktop Gridsfor International Scientific Collaboration APPLICATION OF DESKTOP GRID TECHNOLOGY IN MATERIAL SCIENCE A.Gatsenko, A.Baskova, Yu.Gordienko G.V.Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine International Desktop Grid Federation 1
Simulation of structure and mechanical properties of materials is extremely important in materials science to quantify deformation and strength characteristics of materials. Among variety of new materials the special place is occupied by materials that have nanoscale structure (nanomaterials), such as metal nanocrystals and nanoscale non-metallic materials with unique properties (nanotubes, graphene). 2
Problem • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for realistic configurations take: • huge resources of supercomputers • large shared memory • big number of CPUs. 3
Way to Solution • The distributed computing (DC) model on the basis of: • BOINC, • XtremWeb-HEP, • OurGrid, • EDGeS-bridge, • WS-PGRADE 4
Main Aim • To demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed technical solutions to the example of modeling of physical processes: • tension of nanocrystals in different conditions • tension ensemble of nanocrystals • simulation graphene 5
Technical solution : Open-Source Simulator- LAMMPS LAMMPS - Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator – by Sandia National Laboratories with: • scripts for pre- and post-processing, • multi-core CPU and GPU support, • checkpointing support; • intrinsic message passing, • NO explicit DCI support! Very popular: numerous users/publications --> LAMMPS 6
Porting to DCI on Desktop Grid LAMMPS 7
Operational production infrastructure IMP team maintained and scaled-up DG BOINC infrastructure at the premises of SLinCA@Home IMP Desktop Grid (http://dg.imp.kiev.ua/slinca). From December 10, 2010 it works on the permanent basis with public access of workers (users). 8
Operational production infrastructure The current status of IMP Desktop Grid infrastructure is “under tests of scaling-up” and “under tests of new applications”. SLinCA@Home DG (http://dg.imp.kiev.ua/slinca) was scaled-up from 1500 to > 3000 workers (users); from 10000 to 20 000 in-progress workunits. The current average performance is ~150 GFLOPs with weekly peaks of 550 GFLOPs Last 4-weak performance Number of in-progress workunits 9
Technical Solution - Conclusions Using the Desktop Grid technology with the assistance of volunteer computing resources quickly and easily achieve the required level of performance. 10
Demonstrations for different physical processes: • singlenanocrystals under different tension conditions, • ensembleof nanocrystals under tension, • simulation of graphene under different tension conditions 11
Physical process 1: • Tension of nanocrystals in differentparameters (conditions) 12
Simulation of nano-crystal Al:Typical Sweeping Parameters… External mechanical influence with different values of increasing strain… strain 13
Simulation of nano-crystal Al: Typical Sweeping Parameters… External mechanical influence with different crystal orientations… strain 14
Simulation of nano-crystal Al: Typical Sweeping Parameters… External mechanical influence with different values of rate… 16
Practical Results Physical parameter decomposition for “parameter sweeping” parallelism allow us to widen a range of simulated parameters and find their “magic” (critical) values for atomic self-organization… 2D super-lattice on Al surface 3D hierarchic network of voids in Al bulk 17
Physical Process 1 - Conclusions • the estimation of the influence of various parameters on the process of deformation of materials. • the regimes allow you to create a given structure. 18
Physical process 2: • Tension ensemble of nanocrystals • with different statistical realizations 19
Simulation of nano-crystal Al: Statistical analysis Distribution (PDF) ofconcentrations of defects in the ensemble of ~1000 samples Drift ofPDF (from normal to Weibull) in ensemble of ~1000 samples: quantity->qualitative change …….. FittingPDFandCDF to Weibulldistribution 20
Physical Process 2 - Conclusions Change of defect distribution (from normal to Weibull) isfollowed by qualitative change of plastic deformation mode (from homogeneous strain to localized mode and… fracture!). 21
Physical process 3: • Simulation of graphene for • different parameters
Simulation of grapheneplates Typical Sweeping Parameters… The size effect for different sizes of plates… from 2x2 nm to 2x32nm 24
Simulation of grapheneplates Typical Sweeping Parameters… “Tersoff” “Airebo” influence of the type of interatomic potential… strain strain 25
Practical Results fracture stress dependence of the tensile strain 26
Physical Process 3 - Conclusions • Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the process of deformation and fracture of graphene occurs fragile scenario without the formation of stable defect substructure. • A comparative analysis of the effect of different potentials (Airebo / Tersoff) on qualitative and quantitative process of deformation of graphene. 27
General Conclusions • It is shown that the mechanical characteristics evaluated on the basis of MD simulations using LAMMPS package in the DG-SG DCI are in satisfactory agreement with the experimental data and allowed to discover the new aspects of deformation and fracture mechanisms in nanomaterials • porting MD-applications to DG-SG DCI is easy, if: • BOINC SZTAKI DC-API and SG-DG EDGeS Bridge are used; parameter decomposition and sweeping parallelism is possible; message passing is localized at worker side (in multicore CPU/GPU). 28
Acknowledgements This work is partially funded by FP7 DEGISCO (Desktop Grids for International Scientific Collaboration) (http://degisco.eu). DEGISCO project is supported by the FP7 Capacities Programme under grant agreement number RI-261561 Thank you for your attention! 29