1 / 15

Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni. C.Maglioni, MSC-IC. Mechanical calculations of BB deflections. Observations in 11L6 (J.-Ph.T. & C.). Modelling of bus bars c onstraints. FP. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

sibyl
Download Presentation

Connection Cryostats: status of bus bars studies Report to nMPP V.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Connection Cryostats:status of bus bars studiesReport to nMPPV.Parma, P.Borowiek, C.Maglioni

  2. C.Maglioni, MSC-IC Mechanical calculationsof BB deflections

  3. Observations in 11L6 (J.-Ph.T. & C.)

  4. Modelling of bus bars constraints FP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6

  5. Electro-magnetic forces • In-plane mechanical model • Proportional to I2 • Inv. proportional to distance Comsol Multi-physics

  6. J.-Ph.Tock, 9th March ‘09

  7. Sector cold LE.L5 (Long) Powered 22 times on RB (<10.3kA), 14 times on RQs (<10.9 kA) M3 0 (1’000) 2’070 (860) 1440 (1’000) 850 (1’000) 550 (1’000) ?? (1’000) 09Apr2008 1’060 (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (850) FP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fixed Point Sliding Support state on 06 April 2009, modified by Pawel Borowiec

  8. Powered 105 times on RB (<11.2kA), 76 times on RQs (<11.3kA) Sector warm LE.L6 (Short) M1 31Mar2009 13Feb2009 130 ?? (100) 970 (1’000) ?? (389) 1’010 (1’000) 1520 (1’000) 860 (1’000) 640 (500) 400 (500) 1’000 (1’000) 440 (1’000) 1’000 (1’000) 110 (1’000) 1’870 (1’000) 920 (1’000) 450 (379) FP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 bent bus-bar M2 To be measured again 110 (100) ?? (1’000) ?? (389) ?? (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (1’000) ?? (500) 31Mar2009 500 (500) 990 (1’000) ?? (1’000) 1’000 (1’000) 1’200 (1’000) 1’010 (1’000) 920 (1’000) 480 (379) FP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 M3 31Mar2009 13Feb2009 160 ?? (100) 1280 (1’000) ?? (389) 1’260 (1’000) 680 (1’000) 1’040 (1’000) 640 (500) 1’000 (1’000) 640 (1’000) 780 (1’000) 80 (1’000) 2’160 (1’000) 480 (1’000) 890 (379) FP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fixed Point state on 06 April 2009, modified by Pawel Borowiec Sliding Support

  9. Quad. BB max. deflection as a function of Support spacing and current

  10. Summary of mechanical calculation • With nominal spacing: • M1, M2 (quad BB): elesticity marginal @ 5TeV; some plastic def. at ultimate; deflections well within tube diameter • M3 (dip. BB): within elastic domain up to ultimate; deflections well within tube diameter • Maximum acceptable supports spacing (tube contact) for quad BB (limiting as compared to dip. BB): • @ 5 TeV: up to ~1.55 m • @ nominal: up to ~1.33 m • @ ultimate: up to ~1.3 m

More Related