130 likes | 144 Views
CCM Reorganization. Comment resolution for CCM Text in TGi D3.0 Paul A. Lambert, Russ Housley, Onno Letanche, Dorothy Stanley. Comment Review. Addressing section 8.3.4 8.3.4 contained numerous errors introduce in the editing process
E N D
CCM Reorganization Comment resolution for CCM Text in TGi D3.0 Paul A. Lambert, Russ Housley, Onno Letanche, Dorothy Stanley Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comment Review • Addressing section 8.3.4 • 8.3.4 contained numerous errors introduce in the editing process • On review, it was determined that the section could be made more precise and concise my remove the descriptions of CCM and directly referencing the NIST CCM specification. Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comments addressed by doc 03-118 • Resolves Comments Clause 0--145,147,160,162,194,196,285,287 Clause 8.3.4-- 45,1299,1646 Clause 8.3.4.1--240,575,576,579,1300,1308,1568,1647, 1859,1892,2011 Clause 8.3.4.1.1--148,149,163-165,197-199,209,288-290, 578,830,972-975,1254,1356,1483,1523,1648,1858, 1893 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comments addressed by doc 03-118 • Resolves comments (continued) • Clause 8.3.4.1.2--46,151-154,166-169,185,200-203, 210-213,291-294,579-582,831,872,1165,1357,1569, 1649,1650 • Clause 8.3.4.2--47,583,584,873,976,1651,1652,1671, 1708 • Clause 8.3.4.3--586,592,1167,1525,1570,1571 • Clause 8.3.4.4--188,189,834,835,1360,1361 • Clause 8.3.4.4.1-601 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comments addressed by doc 03-118 • Resolves comments (continued 2) • Clause 8.3.4.4.2--124,155,170,186,204,241,265-268, 295,602,603,832,861,977-981,116,1358,1472,1473, 1615,1653,1654,1709,1851,1852,1894,1992,2012 • Clause 8.3.4.4.3--49,50,137,156-158,171-173,190, 205-207,214,215,242,296-298,604-607,836,874-879, 982-987,1064,1168,1278,1281,1282,1301,1302,1362, 1440,1573,1601,1655,1656,1710-1712,1810,1811 • Clause 8.3.4.4.5--159,174,208,216,299,608,609,998, 999,1574,1657 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comments addressed by doc 03-118 • Resolves comments (continued 3) • Clause 8.3.4.4.6--52-54,610,990,992,1494,1713-1715 • Clause 8.3.4.4.8--55,612-614,993,994,1170,1526,1576, 1716 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Comment Resolution - Rejected • 264 – Reject suggestion to make extended IV bit reserved. Retain use of extended IV • 48 – Reject suggestion to combine dot11CcmpReceiveAddress and a dot11CcmpTransmitAddress into single state element dot11CcmpPartnerAddress. Still confusing • 1952 – Rejected. Comment is incorrect, A3 and A4 are already covered by the MIC • 116,125,808,1263,1334 -- CCMP with MSDUs Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Impacts on additional sections • 1222,1308,1892,2011 – Add J. Johanssen’s reference to the bibliography Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Temporarily Deferred • MIB Variable work - Comments 585,587,588,589,590,591,593,594,595,596,597,598 • Zero Sequence number – Comments187,833,1359,1403,1436,1484 • Have informational note on PN exhaustion in TKIP – Comment 1572 • Reorder PN bytes – Comment 1227 • Set FC word power management bit to 1 – Comments 51,1896 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Temporarily Deferred (continued) • Why not include, zeroed, Duration field –Comment 1169 • Allow non-zero initial PN – Comment 1575 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Already Addressed • 580, 600 – Rejected. IV sequence counter processing applies to BC/MC traffic Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Statistics • CCMP Comments • Total: 261 • T-Y: 131 • T-N: 12 • TR-N: 20 • E-Y: 2 • ?-Y: 1 Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks
Motion • Instruct editor to replace clause 8.3.4 in TGi D3.0 with the text in 11-03-118r1. The editor should also make the following changes to this text: • To change Line 34, Page 60 (Clause 8.3.4.4.3), • "SC - MPDU Sequence Control." to "SC - MPDU Sequence Control, with sequence number field masked to zero“ • To add the following sentence to the end of Line 8, Page 67 (Clause8.3.4.4.8): • "The receiver shall discard MSDUs whose constituent MPDU PN values are not sequential“ • Change the CCMP test vectors accordingly. Paul Lambert, Airgo Networks