290 likes | 453 Views
Harvest strategies. How regulations will change in relation to the state of the fisheryState will usually be estimated stock sizeMay also include price, other species, environment. Pacific halibut 35% vulnerable biomassPacific salmon fixed escapement targetsShould be robust to environmental changes.
E N D
1. Harvesting strategies and tactics Fish 458
2. Harvest strategies How regulations will change in relation to the state of the fishery
State will usually be estimated stock size
May also include price, other species, environment Pacific halibut 35% vulnerable biomass
Pacific salmon fixed escapement targets
Should be robust to environmental changes
3. Harvest tacticsThe regulations used to achieve the strategy Time closures
Area closures
Gear restrictions
Vessel # or size restrictions Pot limits
Size limits
Bag limits
Trip limits
Total Quota
4. The three major classes of strategies Constant exploitation rate
Constant escapement
Constant catch
5. Catch vs run size
6. Mathematical form
7. Typical projection - 2000 target
8. Typical projection 50% h.r.
9. Average Catch
10. Average spawning stock
11. Average catch vs average spawners
12. Average catch vs cv of catch
13. Periodic harvesting Also known as pulse harvesting
geoducks, clear cut logging
good if large economies of scale
good if old individuals are particularly valuable and there is no possibility of size/age selective harvesting
14. Sex specific harvesting Take the males, they are pretty useless
Used primarily in fisheries where animals can be returned to the water with good chance of survival and sex can be determined
Crabs, lobsters etc
Caution - Alaska crabs crashed despite males only
How to calculate needed sex ratio
15. Size limits Commonly used in invertebrate fisheries and sport fisheries
Set size above age at first reproduction
16. Walters dilemma We dont estimate abundance very well, even for trees 20% error is good
Fish are like trees except they are invisible and they move
estimates of abundance can easily be off by 100%
Recent halibut abundance revised upwards 300%
With a 35% harvest rate, if our estimate was double, we would set the quota at a 70% of stock size
This is what happened with northern cod!
17. Walters solution Dont use TACs
Close enough of the space and time fishing opportunities that there is a realistic maximum harvest rate
This has worked for Pacific salmon
18. Why Walters is a crack-pot Such closures would mean an end to the many major fisheries - just what Walters wants to avoid!
Many fisheries rely on fishing the population when it is at its most aggregated and thus totally vulnerable
But he has a very good point!
19. Alternative solutions to Walters Dilemma Be much more cautious - stay on the right hand side of the yield curve
Be much more pro-active and be prepared for rapid changes in quota
Accept much higher risk than we normally admit
20. Walters formula for sustainable harvesting Refugia
economic - tropical tunas
spatial - N. Cod before offshore trawling
temporal - salmon
size - lobsters
21. Reference Points Guidelines for management
May be exploitation rates or biomass based
Two standbys are Fmax and Bmsy
22. Fmax and F0.1
23. Spawning biomass per recruitF35% F40% F45%
24. 20% virgin biomass rule RICC Francis
Accept no policy that has allows the stock to drop below 20% of virgin biomass no more than 10% of the time
Problems - arbitrary, may be too cautious for some species, not cautious enough for others
25. What is generally agreed It is better to be at biomasses larger than BMSY
For reasons of risk, economics and ecosystems
That spatial management should be commonly employed
26. Current controversies If we believe we are lower than BMSY, how important is it to increase biomass, and at what cost
increase in yield may be little if any
economic costs can be great - SNA1
ecosystem benefits are unclear and depend greatly on objectives
27. Current Issues: stabilizing catch
28. Current issues: management procedures
29. Current controversies Establishment of no-take zones
push for 20%-30% default no-take
clear protection benefits
does one pattern of closures work for all species
An alternative is explicit spatial management on a fishery by fishery basis
30. Current controversies Is ecosystem management possible in harvest regulation
What is meant - including people, trophic interaction, environmental forcing?
Can we estimate parameters and use models, or just adopt broad sweeping guidelines?
How do we value species of no commercial value?