1 / 18

Surveys of Enacted Curriculum SEC English Language Learner ELL Project

Why ELL Project. NAEP results, 20074th grade ELLs 36 points below non-ELLs in reading, 25 below in math8th grade gap ? 42 below in reading 37 in math. Source: American Educator. SEC ELL Project Goals. To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject

sissy
Download Presentation

Surveys of Enacted Curriculum SEC English Language Learner ELL Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Surveys of Enacted Curriculum (SEC) – English Language Learner (ELL) Project Jacqueline Iribarren, ESL Consultant Shelley Lee, Science Consultant

    2. Why ELL Project NAEP results, 2007 4th grade ELLs 36 points below non-ELLs in reading, 25 below in math 8th grade gap – 42 below in reading 37 in math

    3. SEC ELL Project Goals To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and assessed on state assessments? What is the relationship of academic English language development standards and assessments to state academic standards? What instructional practices and strategies are used to teach academic English language skills across different subject areas or courses? What is the relationship between the extent of alignment of instruction to standards and student achievement?

    4. SEC ELL Unique Features First project of this nature to focus on ELL’s Coding process for language demand and complexity in addition to content and cognitive demands of regular SEC Information about specific practices (enacted classroom practices) used with ELLs Both regular education and ELL teachers involved in the survey activities

    5. In Wisconsin In March 2008, 47,800 ELLs took the ACCESS® test Approx. 30,000 Spanish Speakers Approx. 13,000 Hmong Speakers 110 home languages

    6. Wisconsin Languages

    7. Title III Federal funding title under NCLB Improve the academic achievement of ELLs Accountability requirements (progress & exit)

    8. The overlapping purposes of all of these standards and objectives are to increase English language proficiency and improve academic achievement. English language proficiency standards define progressive levels of competence in English. These progressive competency levels could help build a map of progress once the English language proficiency assessments are aligned to the English language proficiency standards. English language proficiency standards reflect the proficiency levels necessary for meaningful access to the curriculum and instructional materials at the various grade levels to provide LEP students a means of making progress towards the State academic achievement standards. The overlapping purposes of all of these standards and objectives are to increase English language proficiency and improve academic achievement. English language proficiency standards define progressive levels of competence in English. These progressive competency levels could help build a map of progress once the English language proficiency assessments are aligned to the English language proficiency standards. English language proficiency standards reflect the proficiency levels necessary for meaningful access to the curriculum and instructional materials at the various grade levels to provide LEP students a means of making progress towards the State academic achievement standards.

    9. In Summary: Must increase English language proficiency and Exit (AMAO #1 and #2) Must meet AYP under Title I (AMAO #3)

    10. Wisconsin Picture: Growth of ELLs

    11. Wisconsin Picture: Growth of ELLs Increase in ELLs in WI (in both rural and urban areas) calls for more professional development for both ESL and content areas teachers in the areas of Effective instructional strategies Implementation of ELP standards Scaffolding strategies in content areas Academic content language

    12.

    13. ELL Achievement: MATH

    14. Wisconsin’s Desired Project Outcomes Maps the linkage between the ELP assessment, content area standards, content assessment & ELP standards Via analysis and research – language demands for students while learning the content found in the standards and assessment framework, and WKCE ESL enacted activities in the classroom SEC ELL inform the state’s professional development plan

    15. Wisconsin Pathway/Roadmap Who we selected Why they were chosen Procedures

    16. Wisconsin’s State Data

    17. Wisconsin’s SEC Data

    18. ELL Data Work ELL teachers impressions Science, Mathematics, English Language Arts impressions Assessment data impressions

More Related