340 likes | 443 Views
Spatial and Temporal Variability of GPCP Precipitation Estimates. By C. F. Ropelewski Summarized from the generous input Provided by G. Huffman, R. Adler, S. Curtis, P. Arkin , X. Yin J.Janowiak, P. Xie R. Ferraro P. Bauer C.Beck, J.Grieser, B.Rudolf M. Bell, B. Blumenthal, B. Lyon
E N D
Spatial and Temporal Variability of GPCP Precipitation Estimates By C. F. Ropelewski Summarized from the generous input Provided by G. Huffman, R. Adler, S. Curtis, P. Arkin, X. Yin J.Janowiak, P. Xie R. Ferraro P. Bauer C.Beck, J.Grieser, B.Rudolf M. Bell, B. Blumenthal, B. Lyon F. R. Robertson T. Smith Presented at the 30th Climate Diagnostics and Prediction WS, 24-28 Oct 2005 State College, PA Go LIONS
Characteristics of the GPCP Data Set • Global Complete Monthly Precipitation Analysis • January 1979 to Present • 2.5o latitude by 2.5o longitude • Input data • Satellite Infrared (geostationary0 • Microwave (from mid-1987) • Gauge data (Global Precipitation Climatology • Center (GPCC) operated by the DWD • Output Data • Satellite only • Merged gauge and satellite • Monthly, pentad, daily
Major GPCP contributions Estimates of the global Precipitation patterns Estimated mean global rainfall rates P estimated a 2.61 mm/day Yearly Standard Deviation 0.03mm/day
Figure 1a. Zonal mean precipitation, land versus ocean, 1979-2003, after Adler et al, (2003) Courtesy of Scott Curtis
Figure 1b. Zonal mean precipitation, land versus ocean, 1979-86 versus 1988-2003 After Adler et al, (2003) Courtesy of Scott Curtis
Fig 2. Mean GPCP precipitation 1979-2002 (mm/day) Courtesy John Janowiak
Standard deviations of Annual mean GPCP Precipitation Courtesy Michael Bell
Fig 5b. Mean annual cycle (mm/day) Global (white), Northern Hemisphere (green), Southern Hemisphere (yellow).
Fig 5c. Mean annual cycle of precipitation. Oceans (green), Global (white), Land (yellow). Courtesy P. Arkin
Fig. 6a Annual cycle of zonal mean GPCP Precipitation (mm/day) and b) the difference between total period zonal mean 1979 – 2002 and 1979-86/87. Courtesy J. Janowiak
Fig 4 Mean Differences P1 minus P2 left-middle P2minus P3 rt-middle P1 minus P3 bottom Courtesy P. Arkin Fig 3 (top) Mean GPCP Precipitation P1-1979-86 (left) P2 -1988-95 (middle) P3- 1996-2003 (right) Courtesy P. Arkin
Fig. 3a, Mean precipitation for P1 (1979-86) – Includes a Major ENSO Warm episode but no microwave estimates. (Courtesy P. Arkin)
Fig. 3b, Mean precipitation for P2 (1988-95) – no major ENSO warm Episodes, includes microwave estimates. (Courtesy P. Arkin)
Fig 4a P1 minus P2 8 year mean GPCP precipitation. (Courtesy P. Arkin)
Fig. 3c, Mean precipitation for P3 (1996-2003) – Major ENSO warm Episode, includes microwave estimates. (Courtesy P. Arkin)
Fig. 4b P2 minus P3 eight year periods. Highlights ENSO-No ENSO
Fig 4c P1 minus P3. Shows the differences in strengths between the 1982/83 and 1997/98 ENSOs and due to the addition of microwave estimates. (Courtesy P. Arkin)
Fig.7 Seasonal mean precipitation (mm/day) for a) DJF, b) MAM, c) JJA and d) SON. Courtesy P. Arkin
Time series of GPCP annual mean global precipitation 1979-2003 P estimated at 2.61 mm/day Yearly Standard Deviation 0.03mm/day See Allen, M.R. and W. J. Ingram, 2002: Constraints on future changes in climate and the Hydrologic cycle. Nature, 419, 224-232
Figure 9. (a) Global averages of monthly precipitation (mm day-1) for ocean, total, and land . From Adler et al. 2003.
Fig. 9b) Tropical (30oN-30oS) averages of monthly precipitation anomalies (mm day-1) for (top) total, (middle) ocean, and (bottom) land. Vertical dashed lines indicate the months of significant volcanic eruptions. The thin black curves indicate the Niño-3.4 SST index (oC). After Adler et al 2003.
Fig. 11. Time series of zonal mean precipitation anomaly. Vertical arrow shows the approximate introduction of microwave data Courtesy P. Arkin
a e b f c g d h Fig 10. Time series of zonally averaged GPCP estimates over land (left hand panels) and over the ocean (right hand panels). Zonal averages are for 50N to 90N (a,e); 25N to 50N (b,f); 25S to 25N (c,g) and 50S to 25S (d,h). The introduction of microwave data in 1987 is evident for the data over land.
4. LINEAR TREND FIT ZONAL AVERAGE Zonal averages of 25- year linear trend show quite different trends in different lat. bands – again, note regional coherence. 25°S-25°N ~ .08 / 3.1 = ~ 2.5% 25°-50°N ~ -.12 / 2.4 = ~ -5.4% Land and Ocean are not uniformly related. Fig 10a Linear trends in the zonally averaged GPCP estimated precipitation. Huffman et al.
Figure 12. Map of linear changes in GPCP precipitation anomalies from January 1979 to December 2003. The thin black contour outlines the local 1% significance level. Courtesy Huffman, Curtis and Adler
Fig 12 Spatial correlations between global trend maps computed for the 1979 to 2004 period and trends computed from successively fewer years. E.g., the spatial correlation at “lag” 1 is for the 1980 to 2004 period and so on. (from Smith et al., 2005).
Fourth Rotated EOF of the GPCP Annual data for the period 1979 - 2004. This REOF accounts for 6% of the total variance. (From Smith et al. 2005)
Summary: • The GPCP Data provide (relatively) consistent and complete • global precipitation estimates from (1979) 1988 to the present. • These data identify (illuminate) features of the large-scale • precipitation fields not (well) known before. E.g, oceanic • precipitation patterns, storm tracks, individual ENSO patterns. • Global precipitation shows no significant trends over the • period of record…however regional “trends” are evident • in the tropics. These aren’t easily untangled from instrumental • differences and differences in ENSO in the 17 (25) yr record. • These are research data. For real-time monitoring go to CAMS-OPI or other “operational” estimates (eventually go to CMORPH).