210 likes | 273 Views
T Ch3: Strategic Information Systems. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Strategic Information Systems & Their adv. Some Str Info System Frameworks (4 ITOP) Port’s 5-Force analysis & how to use it for ITOP. Value Chain Model and how to use it for ITOP Porter & Millar’s 5-step process .
E N D
T Ch3: Strategic Information Systems LEARNING OBJECTIVES • Strategic Information Systems & Their adv. • Some Str Info System Frameworks (4 ITOP) • Port’s 5-Force analysis & how to use it for ITOP. • Value Chain Model and how to use it for ITOP • Porter & Millar’s 5-step process. • Customer Resource Life Cycle framework (CRLC) • Global Business Drivers Sheu
Strategic Information Systems • Strategic Competitive Advantages (SCA) • Relative advantages of our org. vs competitors that: • Have broad impacts in scope and organizations • Have long term impact • Are hard to reverse in a shorter time frame (< 1yr) • Usually need long time to plan and implement • Often involve use of significant resources • Sustainable Strategic (Competitive) Advantage • SCA that is hard for competitors to copy or overcome for a long time. ( say, 5 yr or longer) • SIS (Strategic Information System) • An info sys that is characterized by its: • Ability to create/enhance Str. Competitive Advantages. • Ability to change significantly the manner the business is done. NB: SIS ≠Strategic-level Information System Sheu
Common Competitive Strategies • Porter’s 3 generic strategies for SCA • Low Cost • Product differentiation • Functions/Features; Quality • Focus (Niche Market) • We should also add: • Lead time • Service • Flexibility (to order changes, etc.) • Central issue of the course: How to use IT to help create SCAs like those listed above. • => ITOP for the best advantage of the org. • Additional interest: desire sustainable SCA. • There are systematic way of finding ITOP. Sheu
進入障礙: .規模經濟 .產品差異化 .品牌辨認 .更換成本 .資本需求 .運輸通路 .絕對成本優勢 .學習曲線 .產品設計 .政府政策 .預期報復 敵對決定因素: .產業成長 .固定成本/附加價值 .間斷性產能過剩 .產品差異化 .品牌辨認 .更換成本 .集中與均衡 .資訊複雜 .競爭者之多樣化 .公司賭注退出阻礙 新進入者 產業競爭者 強烈的敵對競爭 買方 供應商 供應商 議價能力 買方 議價能力 替代品威脅 替代品 供應商力量之決定因素: .投入之差別化 .產業中供應商之更換成本 .替代投入品之存在 .供應商集中度 .供應商之重要數量 .相對於產業購貨之成本 .投入成本或差異化之影響 .公司在產業中向前整合對向後整合之威脅 替代品威脅之決定因素: .替代品之價格表現 .更換成本 .買方對於替代品之偏好 決定買方力量之因素: .議價槓桿.價格敏感性 .買方對公司集中度.價值/總購買量 .買方數量.產品差異化 .買方更換成本相對.品牌辨認 於公司之更換成本 .買方對於後向整合.品質績效之影響 之資訊 .替代品.買方獲利率 .決策者之激勵 Recall 5-Force Analysis Sheu
Using 5-Force Analysis 4 ITOP:Method 1: consider determinants one by one Ask ourselves questions: • Can an IS help us to: • Diminish Supplier bargaining power ? • Reduce supplier differentiation to us? • Lower switching cost of supplier? • … • Create Entry Barriers ? • Create economy of scale ? • Create proprietary product diff? • Gain competitive edge w/i existing industry ? • Create growth • Brand identity • .… Sheu
Using 5-Force Analysis 4 ITOP:Method 2: matching player w/ determinants (fg 3.5) Step 1: The players in each force are listed.(fg 3.5) Step 2: Analysis to relate the determinants (fg 3.4 & more) to each player in fg 3.5. • W/ each player: Analyze if we can achieve the effect as implied by each determinant. Eg: Step 3: Devise a strategy to defend org. against the listed threats. Strategies could be grouped/integrated. Step 4: Look for IT to support the business strategy. <Steps 3 & 4 could be mutual adjusting. Iterating back ad forth to find a set of ITOP.> Sheu
Optional HW: 5-Force Analysis for ITOP • Use your project company/organization or industry as the central organization. • Apply 5-force analysis to analyze the competitive dynamics of your subject organization. • Pick one force & one target player in that force: • Identify areas where: • You think are needing a boost to enhance your bargaining power & competitive position. • Where application of IT can help to enhance your position. • Submit HW in terms of: • BRIEF Co. & industry description • 5-force analysis (Method 1 or 2) • IT opportunities: IS name / Functionality / Benefits sought Sheu
Value Chain Analysis (Method 1) • Step 1: As-is description • Present value chain from (process) segments to Individual processes. Clearly identify the sequence (chain) of the processes. • May also have branches. • Step 2: Simplification/Rationalization/Standardization • Examine the value/function for each process. (Is the step necessary? Can it be removed?) • Ask: Is it possible to integrate/re-arrange steps to make the overall processes simpler. • Step 3: IT opportunity • Is it possible to use IT to make a target process more efficient? • Is it possible to use IT to integrate/re-arrange steps. • Can we build an integrated IS to make the whole process more efficient? • Step 4: Requirement analysis • List the system requirements of such an IT system. Sheu
Information Intensity & Content • Information Intensity: (I-I) • Measures the actual and planned usage of information. (High intensity High level of Info usage) • Measured separately 4 each link in the value chain. • Information Content: (I-C) • Refers to the amount of info included in the creation of a product or service. Sheu
Porter/Millar’s 5-step Process(VCA Method 2) • Step 1: Assess info intensity • Assess I-I of each link in each of their value chain • If supplier/customer highly dept on info, I-I is high => likely to have strategic oppr for IS. • Step 2: Determine Role of IT in industry structure. • Know how buyers/suppliers/competitors might be affected by & react to IT. • Step 3: Identify & rank ITOP • Step 4: Investigate how IT might spawn new business • What Info generated should be sold? • What IT capability could be used to start a new business • Can IT help produce new items for sale? • Step 5: develop a plan 4 the ITOP. • Process should be business driven rather than technology driven. • Benetton SPA case • Italian fashion retailer. • S1: Low I-C product but high I-I in its value chain. (Cloth design/production/sale highly dept on timely/accurate info flow) (20% of new fashion dept on previous ideas.) => ITOPs exist. • S2: Det the role ot IT. • Reduce lead time improv response time to customer req. S3: via computerized mfg env. Benetton can let W.W. customer to receive items in 2-3 wks (3 times faster than major competitors. S5: Plan developed & implemented.
Customer Resource Life Cycle F. (CRLC) • Idea: Org. differentiate itself from competitor in the eyes of customers. • => Determine stages customers go thru in their transaction cycle. (Original: 13 stages but not quite good) (tbl 3.3) • On each stage of the life cycle Seek ITOP. • Global Business Drivers • tbl 3.4 Sheu
On Sustainability • Pure IS can rarely provide sustainable SCA. • When SIS are combined w/ structural changes in org => could provide sustainable SCA. • How? • Inward vs Outward systems Sheu