1 / 13

All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action Washington, DC April 12-14, 2010

New Technologies and Reading within EFA Trends and Evidence. All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action Washington, DC April 12-14, 2010. Prof. Dan Wagner International Literacy Institute University of Pennsylvania wagner@literacy.upenn.edu www.literacy.org. Main points.

snyderl
Download Presentation

All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action Washington, DC April 12-14, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Technologies and Reading within EFA Trends and Evidence All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action Washington, DC April 12-14, 2010 Prof. Dan Wagner International Literacy Institute University of Pennsylvania wagner@literacy.upenn.edu www.literacy.org

  2. Main points • Technology and literacy: Possible? • Trends: Fiscal and human investments • Can it be implemented? Examples from India and South Africa • Conclusions

  3. 1. Technology and literacy Many say impossible, because… • Infrastructure is not available • Costs are too high • Illiterates can’t use technology • Technology can’t really fight illiteracy Current evidence suggests the contrary… …Namely, that technology and literacy can and should go together

  4. 2. Spending on ICTs is increasing worldwide… Overall Global ICT Spending USD trillions ICT Spending by Region USD trillions WISTA, 2008

  5. 2. …but there is a problem of allocation • While “digital divide” is decreasing betweencountries… • Digital divide is increasingwithin countries. • More than 90% of ICT investments in education in LDCs go to secondary and higher education. • This allocation excludes more than half the population (1-2 billion people) in poor countries.

  6. 2. The kinds of ICT inputs vary greatly • Access • Improving dramatically (esp. mobile phones), but limited learning impact • Connectivity • Improving moderately, mainly urban areas • Content (local languages and subject matter) • Modest efforts, and almost none among the poor • Building reading competencies • Rare Our goal should be: Focus on EFA and reading, by building on local learning competencies

  7. Emphasis on learning Telugu as main implementation language. – ICT support the value of local languages Learning approach - Relevance of content - High quality instruction - Extremely “user-friendly” 3. India: Empowering a regional language

  8. 3. India: Significant learning gains • Two evaluations • Location, near Hyderabad • Ages: 15 - 25 years • Little or no schooling • Ave. 2 hours/week • Results: More than twice as fast rate of learning as control. • ALSO, replicated on young children in Grades 1-2 • Costs: module production, about US$200K Math ICT-based Reading Control, no-ICT Learning rate per hour

  9. 3. South Africa: Limpopo Province • High poverty, poor schooling • 4 official languages in the province • Mass Literacy Campaign • Multimedia cost: US$250K for basic literacy • 3 quick multimedia clips on learning approach • The storyline and language choice • Understanding words in context • Learning to write

  10. 3. South Africa: Introduction and language choice

  11. 3. South Africa: Understanding words in context

  12. 3. South Africa: Learning to write

  13. 4. Conclusions • Investments in ICTs are growing, but much is going to the wrong places • Particular EFA needs (especially local languages and skill levels) must be carefully addressed • Near-term efforts should be based on available hardware and human infrastructure, and not await ‘pie in the sky’ solutions. • Increased ICT investments should be made in learning rather than hardware • More evidence needs needs to be gathered on learning outcomes of ICTs

More Related