1 / 28

Energy Utility Technology Program: Grant, Partnerships, and Accomplishments

This presentation outlines the details of a community-based job training grant from the US Department of Labor that supports the Energy Utility Technology Program. The program has achieved various accomplishments to date and involves partnerships with National Grid and multiple community colleges. The curriculum, recruitment efforts, job placements, and future steps are discussed.

sragland
Download Presentation

Energy Utility Technology Program: Grant, Partnerships, and Accomplishments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy Utility Technology October 27, 2008 This program is supported by a Preseident’s Community- Based Job Training Grant from the US Department of Labor

  2. Outline of Presentation • Grant and Partnership Details • Accomplishments to date • National Grid Participation • Curriculum • Recruitment • Placement 7 • Next Steps

  3. Partners National Grid Middlesex Community College North Shore Community College Quinsigamond Community College

  4. Program Facts • Supported by President’s Community-Based Job Training Grant from US DOL $1.87M • 3 Year Grant – Began January 2007 • Operates at 3 colleges in partnership with each other and National Grid • Leadership Team • Nancy Alberto, North Shore CC • Pam Arons, National Grid • Kathy Rentsch, Quinsigamond CC • Barry Werner, Middlesex CC, Program Manager

  5. What Interested the Colleges • National Grid seemed an ideal partner • Helped with the grant writing • Pledged tangible support to the colleges • Would have worked with colleges even if we didn’t get the grant • Would help recruit students • Jobs were desirable – easy to recruit students • High pay • Great benefits • Job security • Good evidence of need for EUT workers

  6. Grant Objectives • Develop Certificate Programs at each college • Create EUT Lab at each college • Hire or Identify faculty at each college • Recruit 162 students in 3 years • Graduate 129 certificate students • Place 100 students in energy utility jobs

  7. Accomplishments • Hired faculty • Built labs for the program • Developed curriculum • Recruited, instructed and graduated students • 58 began in September 2007 • 45 graduated in May, 2008 • 88% passed CAST on the first attempt • 33 graduates placed to date • 60 students started classes in September 2008

  8. National Grid Participation • Search Processes • Lab Development • Curriculum Development • Recruitment • Faculty Training

  9. National Grid Participation • Donations • Scholarships • Equipment • Practicum • Visits to classes

  10. Labs • Colleges identified lab space for the programs • Mutual agreement on lab equipment • National Grid personnel helped determine what to order • National Grid donated equipment • Use system by LabVolt

  11. Curriculum • Curriculum Committee • Pam Arons – National Grid • Bill Dylengoski, North Shore • Sharron Gillies – Quinsigamond • Joe Kalus - Middlesex • Ken Lomax – National Grid • John McNamara – National Grid • Neil Sheer – Middlesex • Barry Werner – Program Manager

  12. Curriculum • Developed in the Curriculum Committee • Similar Courses at each college • Same textbooks • Revised as we continue the process

  13. Courses

  14. EUT Practicum • Resume writing and Interview Skills 2 weeks • Training at NG Training Site 8 weeks • Tour of a Substation 1 week • CAST Test 1 week • Tour of a Municipal Utility 1 week

  15. Activities and Recent Accomplishments • CAST Testing • 88% passed on first attempt • 3 of 5 passed on second attempt • Career Fair – 135 potential job seekers attended • National Grid increased scholarship funding • Aimed to increase women and minority participation • $5,000 per college in first year • $10,000 per college in second year • Presentation at NEPPA

  16. Activities and Recent Accomplishments • Visits to class by industry personnel • Visits to Municipal facilities (Shrewsbury and Concord) • Classes in resume writing and interview skills • Sharron Gillies training at National Grid

  17. Incoming Class Demographics Gender Male – 53 Female - 1

  18. Recruitment Efforts • Recruitment has been very successful – More applicants than openings • Admission standards are high • Read and write at college level • Ability to do basic algebra • Efforts at High School Recruitment • Open Houses • High School Visits • Career and College Fairs • Work of Career Centers

  19. High School visits to NG Training Site Ken Lomax talking to High School Students at NG

  20. National Grid at a Career Fair Kate Darwin Showing a Service Truck to Students

  21. Job Placement • 31 students placed at National Grid so far • 5 are in process of being hired • 3 placed into local municipal utilities • A few students have been offered jobs and declined them

  22. Industry Participation in Classes • August – Curriculum Team met to review the year • Satisfaction with results • Need for more industry participation in the classes • Safety class requires person with industry experience • Industry personnel should give guest lectures in the Intro to the Industry Course • Looking for industry personnel to visit classes at Middlesex and Quinsigamond

  23. A Great Partnership • Colleges cooperated – did not compete • Sharing • National Grid Personnel are champions of the program • Communication • People like and respect each other

  24. Sustainability • Enrollment is sufficient to maintain the programs at the colleges • How do we maintain the partnership?

  25. Conclusion • This is a model that works • From college perspective – No brainer • Lot’s of student interest in program • Relatively inexpensive lab that is easy to maintain • Good job prospects for graduates • From Company Perspective • Get good applicants • Demonstrated Commitment • Understand underlying principles of the work

  26. Issues Colleges are short of money Companies will need to provide a robust commitment to the programs • Curriculum • Training support • Help with funding lab equipment • Recruitment Check out federal grants

  27. Contact Information Barry Werner, Program Manager wernerb@middlesex.mass.edu

More Related