210 likes | 354 Views
Planning Partners. HART. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Mary Shavalier. New Tampa / Wesley Chapel – Making Better Connections. HART Rapid Transit Investment Plan and Alternatives Analysis. Presentation Overview. Rapid Transit Investment Plan
E N D
Planning Partners HART Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Mary Shavalier New Tampa / Wesley Chapel – Making Better Connections
HART Rapid Transit Investment Planand Alternatives Analysis Presentation Overview • Rapid Transit Investment Plan • Alternatives Analysis Overview and Schedule
Bus System Expansion • More service on existing routes • New local routes • New express routes • New FLEX & Circulator service • Expanded service on evenings, weekends and holidays • More paratransit service for persons with disabilities
Rapid Transit • MetroRapid • 6 new routes • 90 miles new service • Rail Transit • 46 miles and • 15 miles of regional connections
Plan Funding - Revenue • Existing revenues • Passenger fares, local, state and federal funding, ad valorem property taxes • Potential revenues add • Sales tax revenue • 75% of proposed new 1¢ sales tax • Average household will pay an additional $12 a month • Significant additional revenue leveraged by sales tax • Around $3 billion in Federal and State New Starts
Plan Funding - Expenses Expenses Covered In the Plan • Capital costs • Rail, bus facilities, Park and Rides, shelters, stop improvements, etc • Operating costs • For all modes (e.g., rail, HART Plus) • Maintenance: state of good repair • Contingency funds • Debt servicing • Interlocal Agreement creates Oversight Committee
Background Planning study to select the transit alternative to best address local needs, called the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Elements: Travel demand modeling Alternatives development and evaluation Environmental evaluation Public involvement and agency coordination Documentation to seek capital funding under the federal New Starts program
New Starts ConsiderationsProject Selection Travel Time Savings Important Costs Must Be Supported by Benefits Serve Low Income Households and Jobs Enhance Project Rating and Environmental Justice Supportive Land Use Densities and Pedestrian Infrastructure Plan Policies and Performance Length of Initial Segment Influenced by federal funding availability
Alignment Evaluation 3 Step Screening Process
Plan Funding - Revenue • Existing revenues • Passenger fares, local, state, federal, ad valorem • New revenues • Sales tax revenue • 75% of proposed 1¢ sales tax • Significant additional revenue leveraged by sales tax • Around $3 billion in Federal and State New Starts
Mode Evaluation Considerations Ridership Costs, including life cycle Ability to support positive land use change Environmental – air quality Local plans and policies Public input
Bruce B. Downs Boulevard • Coordination with Hillsborough County work evaluating roadway design and transit configuration
Study Schedule Public Outreach Sept 7th – Oct 7th 2010 Findings to HART Board Oct 18th 2010 Public and agency feedback Mode Evaluation Alignment Evaluation Implementation Strategy Both Corridors
Public Outreach Sept 7 – Oct 7 2010 Ways to get project information 7 Community Workshops Attendance at stakeholder meetings Newsletter and website 2 public hearings Late September What can you do tonight? Fill out a HART Alternatives Analysis comment form – we want to hear from you!