1 / 21

Minnesota Department Of Transportation Integrating the Transportation Asset Management Plan into

Minnesota Department Of Transportation Integrating the Transportation Asset Management Plan into MnDOT Plans and Programs Kirby Becker, Asset Management Planning Director Wednesday, October 29, 2014. Why Asset Management?.

stephen-hester
Download Presentation

Minnesota Department Of Transportation Integrating the Transportation Asset Management Plan into

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minnesota Department Of Transportation Integrating the Transportation Asset Management Plan into MnDOT Plans and Programs Kirby Becker,Asset Management Planning Director Wednesday, October 29, 2014

  2. Why Asset Management? • Highest Efficiency (lowest Life Cycle Costs) from Holistic, long term decisions (Capital and Maintenance tradeoffs). • MnDOT Tell the Story – Resources needed to meet service expectations/targets.

  3. A Logical Next Step for MnDOT MnDOT Data Business Plan Highway System Operations Plan (HSOP) Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan (SMTP) State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP)

  4. Key TAMP Components: Identified in MAP-21 • Asset Inventory/Conditions • Objectives/Measures • Performance Gap Assessment • Life Cycle Cost • Risk Analysis • Financial Plan • Investment Strategies • Enhancements

  5. FHWA Transportation Asset Management Pilot Project • Support three state DOTs with developing their first TAMP • Develop TAMP Work Plan • Working with FHWA & MnDOT consultants • MAP-21 deadline for Federal approval of TAMP • October 2015

  6. TAMP Development Structure A collaborative process: • Steering Committee • Staff from Key Areas • Project Management Team • Sub-set of Steering Committee • Work Groups • Subject Matter Experts for each asset category • Regular Check-in with Senior Leadership Team

  7. Asset Management Plan Scope Highway Assets • Pavement • Bridge • Drainage Structures • Highway Culverts • Deep Storm Water Tunnels • Guardrails • Traffic Signals • Signs • Overhead Sign Structures • Pavement Markings • ITS • Pedestrian Ramps • Lighting • High-Mast Light Tower Structures • Land • Rest Areas • Sidewalks • Retaining Walls • Tunnels • Noise Barrier • Fencing • Weigh Stations • ADA Infrastructure • Modal Infrastructure • Transit Vehicles

  8. TAMP Progress

  9. Asset Inventory & Conditions • Summary of asset inventory and conditions • “Folios” for each asset category • System size and replacement value • Data collection, management, and reporting methods • Condition ratings, targets, and investment levels

  10. Asset Folios: Pavements Example

  11. Performance Measures by Asset Type

  12. Risk Management Analysis • Enterprise Risk Management • MnSHIP • HSOP • Bridge Management (BRIM) • Pavement Management (HPMA) • Research • Risk as it affects transportation • Risk management at MnDOT • MnDOT’s TAMP risk assessment process • “Undermanaged Risks” • Prioritization of mitigation strategies

  13. Risk Management Analysis

  14. Life-Cycle Costs Iceberg Initial Capital Expenditures Future Capital Costs Maintenance Costs Operational costs are not part of LCC, but are part of overall management $ Background image: http://www.pvisoftware.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Pegasus_vertex_Iceberg.png

  15. Life-Cycle Costs (Typical Asset Life-Cycle Phases) -

  16. Financial Plan 2014-2023 Capital Investments

  17. Targets and Investments (Performance Gap) • Performance Targets were recommended for hydraulics assets

  18. Implementation & Future Developments • MnDOT’s focus: fully incorporating asset management into existing plans and policies • Governance (TAMP Implementation Task Force) • Implementation priorities • Mitigating undermanaged risks • Overarching business process enhancements • Research priorities • Lessons learned

  19. Key Messages, Findings, Recommendations • Life-cycle costing • Incorporating TAMP into existing practices • Data gaps • What is the purpose? Reporting of Decision-making Process vs. Vehicle for improvement

  20. Moving Forward • Enhancements • Enhance existing business processes • Build on existing information, plan, and processes TAMP • Future Capital Plan (MnSHIP) • Starting to incorporate life-cycle analysis • Adding detailed information about “other roadside infrastructure” • Future Operations Plan (HSOP) • Requirements for maintenance by asset type • More strategic • More data-driven http://www.dot.state.mn.us/assetmanagement/index.html

  21. Thank You! For further information contact Kirby Becker Kirby.becker@state.mn.us (651) 366-3740

More Related