440 likes | 455 Views
An overview of initial CAMx simulations, model configurations, evaluation metrics, and performance outcomes for PM and light extinction. The presentation also covers next steps in model configuration and identified issues for improvement.
E N D
CRGAQS:Initial CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation October 31, 2006 (boo!)
Today’s Presentation • Describe initial CAMx simulations • Model configuration • Performance evaluation metrics • Performance for PM and light extinction • Next Steps
Model Configuration • CAMx version 4.40 • “Run 1” configuration • Maximize model speed • Mechanism 4 – CF (static 2-mode PM chemistry) • Bott advection solver • No PiG • OMP parallel processing on Linux quad-CPU • O’Brien Kv profile with 0.1 m2/s minimum • 10-day model spin-up period • 36-km grid only first 8 days • 36/12-km grid last 2 days
Model Configuration • Episodes • August 10-22, 2004 • Meteorology from MM5 Run 6, 36/12-km grids • Flexi-nesting to the 4-km grid • November 4-18, 2004 • Meteorology from MM5 Run 3, all grids • Identified issues • Small temporal profile problem for fires • No on-road vehicle ammonia emissions in 4-km grid
Performance Evaluation • Review spatial plots • Review statistical performance • Species • Individual PM species • Total PM2.5 and PM10 • Light scattering/extinction • Monitors • IMPROVE, Gorge sites, FRM/STN • Focus on sites along Gorge
Performance Evaluation • Metrics • Fractional bias and gross error • Regression and correlation • Need to develop time series of scattering and extinction
August 14, noon Pristine Performance Evaluation
Statistics – IMPROVE August NO3 August SO4
Statistics – IMPROVE August NH4 August OC
Statistics – IMPROVE August EC August Primary Fine
Statistics – IMPROVE August Primary Coarse August Total PM2.5
Statistics – IMPROVE August Total PM10 August Bext
Statistics – Gorge August NO3 August SO4
Statistics – Gorge August NH4 August OC
Statistics – Gorge August EC August Bscat
Statistics – STN August NO3 August SO4
Statistics – Gorge August NH4 August OC
Statistics – Gorge August EC August FRM PM2.5
Initial August Modeling • NO3, SO4, and NH4 were mostly under predicted • CAMx predictions higher at Gorge sites later in episode, but data were not available • More NH3 may increase NO3 and NH4 • OC was mostly over predicted at IMPROVE and Gorge sites • Driven by fires
Initial August Modeling • EC was over predicted at IMPROVE but under predicted at Gorge sites • Reasons not clear – is Gorge EC backed out from aetholometer readings? • Total PM2.5 looks good • Balance of component over and under predictions • CM and PM10 were mostly under predicted at IMPROVE site
Initial August Modeling • Reconstructed scattering and extinction look good • Due to good PM2.5 predictions and dry conditions • Contribution from under predicted hygroscopic salts just about balance contribution from over predicted carbon • CM doesn’t play a large role in visibility
November 10, noon Pristine Performance Evaluation
Statistics – IMPROVE November NO3 November SO4
Statistics – IMPROVE November NH4 November OC
Statistics – IMPROVE November EC November Primary Fine
Statistics – IMPROVE November Primary Coarse November Total PM2.5
Statistics – IMPROVE November Total PM10 November Bext
Statistics – Gorge November NO3 November SO4
Statistics – Gorge November NH4 November OC
Statistics – Gorge November EC November Bscat
Statistics – STN November NO3 November SO4
Statistics – Gorge November NH4 November OC
Statistics – Gorge November EC November FRM PM2.5
Initial November Modeling • More NO3 and SO4 was observed and predicted than in the August episode. • OC and PM2.5 were much lower over domain than in August since wildfire season was over
Initial November Modeling • SO4 performed well at IMPROVE sites, but was under predicted at the GORGE and STN sites • NO3 performance was scattered • NH4 was mostly under predicted • OC and EC performance OK, but there were some over prediction outliers
Initial November Modeling • Primary fine and coarse (soil) was over predicted at all IMPROVE sites on all dates • Fine PM emissions may not reflect squelching effect of recent rains • Reconstructed total PM2.5 and PM10 slightly over predicted • Driven by carbon and primary over predictions
Initial November Modeling • Extinction at IMPROVE sites was generally too low, while scattering at Gorge sites exhibits little skill • Under predicted salts are not contributing sufficient scattering • More NH3 might not help • Lack of modeled fog probably is not generating enough sulfates and nitrates
Moving Forward • Sensitivity/Diagnostic runs • Revised emissions (fix identified problems) • Kv sensitivity • CMAQ approach • Alternative minimum Kz • Met sensitivity for August? (use Run 3) • Increase NH3 emissions • Reduce primary fine/coarse emissions in November