530 likes | 778 Views
No Plume Beneath Iceland. talk given at the Colorado School of Mines, 2nd March 2006 Gillian R. Foulger Durham University, U.K. Evidence in support of a plume beneath Iceland. History of magmatism Uplift High temperatures Crustal structure Mantle structure. DISKO. FAROES & E GREENLAND.
E N D
No Plume Beneath Iceland talk given at the Colorado School of Mines, 2nd March 2006 Gillian R. Foulger Durham University, U.K.
Evidence in support of a plume beneath Iceland • History of magmatism • Uplift • High temperatures • Crustal structure • Mantle structure
DISKO FAROES & E GREENLAND ODP 158 BRITISH PROVINCE 1. History of magmatism Jones (2005) 61-59 Ma 54 Ma
Formed over the last 54 Million years Thick crust 1. History ofmagmatism:Iceland
2. Uplift 400-900 m 420-620 m 380-590 m 180-425 m 0-100 m 500-800 m 0 - 200 m 0-200 m Jones (2005)
2. Uplift • Uplift rapid • Approached 1 km in some places 400-900 m 420-620 m 380-590 m 180-425 m 0-100 m 500-800 m 0 - 200 m 0-200 m Jones (2005)
3. High-temperatures ~ 100 K temperature anomaly for Iceland relative to MORB Arndt (2005)
4. Crustal structure Foulger et al. (2003) Crustal structure from receiver functions
5. Mantle structure Whole-mantle tomography: A plume from the core-mantle boundary. Bijwaard & Spakman (1999)
The Iceland plume? A slam dunk!
Let us look in detail, to find out more about what the Iceland plume is like.
Seismological studies of Iceland Foulger et al. (2003)
Crustal structure • Variations in crustal thickness should be parallel to spreading direction • Crust should be thickest in the west, behind the plume Foulger et al. (2003)
Crustal structure The melting anomaly has always been centred on the mid-Atlantic ridge
Iceland: Mantle tomography • Over 2,000,000 data • S-wave arrival times (S, SS, SSS, ScS & SKS) • fundamental- & higher-mode Rayleigh-wave phase velocities • normal-mode frequencies • Probably best spherical harmonic model for the transition zone & mid-mantle Ritsema et al. (1999)
Hudson Bay plume? Whole-mantle tomography Bijwaard & Spakman (1999)
Transition zone discontinuities Predicted topography on the 410-km and 650-km discontinuities Du et al. (2006)
Transition zone discontinuities • 410 warps down by 15 km • 650 flat • No evidence for anomalous structure or physical conditions at 650 km beneath Iceland Du et al. (2006)
Temperature Can be investigated using: • Petrology • Seismology • Modeling bathymetry • Modeling vertical motion • Heat flow
Petrological temperature ~ 100 K temperature anomaly for Iceland relative to MORB Arndt (2005)
? Iceland? Petrological temperature Hawaii 1570˚ MORs 1280-1400˚ Gudfinnsson et al. (2003)
Temperature: Seismology Vs Vertical scale x 10 DT ~ 200˚C DT ~ 100˚C Ritsema & Montagner (2003) Vertical scale x 1 Iceland
Temperature: Iceland Foulger et al. (2005)
Uplift: Magnitude & Duration • 61 Ma uplift associated with British igneous activity variable, low amplitude (few 100 m) & localised. • 54 Ma uplift associated with igneous activity distant from proposed plume, high amplitude (up to 1 km) & widespread. • Time between onset and peak uplift for both igneous phases probably << 1 Myr. • Uplift history complex & not satisfactorily explained by any single published model.
DISKO FAROES & E GREENLAND ODP 158 BRITISH PROVINCE 1. History of magmatism Jones (2005) 61-59 Ma 54 Ma
Summary • Variations in crustal thickness inconsistent with plume predictions • Mantle anomaly confined to upper mantle • No reliable evidence for plume-like temperatures • Uplift history complex and not well explained • Distribution of magmatism inconsistent with plume predictions
An alternative model Plate tectonic processes (“PLATE”) • Two elements: • Variable source fertility • Extensional stress A cool, shallow, top-driven model
Mid-ocean ridges (1/3 of all “hot spots”) Many others intraplate extensional areas PLATE: Lithospheric extension
PLATE: Variable mantle fertility • Possible sources: • recycling of subducted slabs in upper mantle Peacock (2000)
PLATE: Variable mantle fertility • Possible sources: • delamination of continental lithosphere Schott et al. (2000)
Pyrolite Eclogite The liquidus & solidus of subducted crust are lower than peridotite • Subducted crust transforms to eclogite at depth • Eclogite is extensively molten at the peridotite solidus Cordery et al. (1997)
Geochemistry of “hot spot” lavas • Can be modeled as fractional melting of MORB • Ocean Island Basalt (OIB) comes from recycled near-surface materials e.g., subducted oceanic crust Hofmann & White (1982)
Iceland: Extension Jones (2005) Iceland has been persistently centred on the mid-Atlantic ridge
Relationship to the Caledonian suture Recycled Iapetus crust in source? Can remelting of Iapetus slabs account for the excess melt, geochemistry & petrology? Iceland: Mantle fertility Closure of Iapetus
Melt fraction : Temperature Yaxley (2000) A 30/70 eclogite-peridotite mixture can generate several times as much melt as peridotite
Geochemical evidence for crustal recycling • Recent papers: Korenaga & Keleman (2000); Breddam (2002); Chauvel & Hemond (2000) • Estimated primary mantle melt from Iceland, E & SE Greenland shows source mantle enriched in Fe; Mg# is as low as 0.87 • Heterogeneity suggests MORB mantle also involved • Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotopes & dO18 suggest recycling of subducted, aged oceanic crust, ± sub-arc magmatism, ± sediments
Iceland: REE patterns Foulger et al. (2005) Iceland REE can be modeled by extensive melting of subducted crust + small amount of alkali olivine basalt
The alternative hypothesis is... • Iceland is a “normal” part of the MAR where excess melt is produced from remelting Iapetus slabs • However, the amount of melt produced by isentropic upwelling of eclogite cannot at present be calculated
Foulger et al. (2003) Tectonics & crustal structure Iceland is also a region of local, persistent tectonic instability
Iceland: Tectonic evolution Foulger (in press)
Iceland: Tectonic evolution Foulger (2002)
Crustal structure The thickspot beneath Iceland may be a submerged oceanic microplate
Iceland: The mantle anomaly • Can be explained by 0.1% partial melt • a more fusible mantle composition • CO2 fluxing • Could simply be a place where the low-velocity zone is thicker Iceland
Summary • Superficially, several observations are consistent with plume theory • Closer examination virtually never fulfills the predictions of plume theory
Summary • 2 approaches: • adapt plume theory to fit • accept that plume theory fails and boldly go where no man has gone before
Resources: http://www.mantleplumes.org/