150 likes | 291 Views
Homosexuality Texts & Hermeneutics. Hermeneutics. Traditional View of Sexuality Scripture Reason/Science Experience Revisionist View of Sexuality Experience Reason/Science Scripture. Texts. Genesis 19 - Sodom Revisionist View Sin of gang rape Sin of inhospitality
E N D
Homosexuality Texts & Hermeneutics
Hermeneutics • Traditional View of Sexuality • Scripture • Reason/Science • Experience • Revisionist View of Sexuality • Experience • Reason/Science • Scripture
Texts • Genesis 19 - Sodom • Revisionist View • Sin of gang rape • Sin of inhospitality • Ezek 16:49 “arrogant, overfed and unconcerned”; Matt 10:14-15 • Lot went against ANE social norms • “To know” means “to get acquainted” not “to have sex” Gen 19:5 • Sin of sex with angels (Jude 7)
Texts • Genesis 19 - Sodom • Traditional View • Gang rape and homosexuality • Inhospitality and homosexuality • Ezek 16:50 “They were haughty and did abominations before me.”from Lev 18:22; 20:13 • Lot should’ve been punished • Yada‘ is translated “to know sexually” • Context - Lot’s daughters (Gen 19:8, 14) • Judges 19 - yada‘ means sex • Not known to be angels
Texts • Leviticus 18:22; 20:13 • Revisionist View • Only refers to temple prostitutes • Gay sex is OK. Gay sex in temple is not. • Abomination = impurity (eagles, lobsters) • Holiness Code doesn’t apply to us • Sex with menstruating woman (18:18; 20:18), mate diff animals (19:19), mixing seed/fabric (19:19), cutting side burns (19:27), tattoos (19:28)
Texts • Leviticus 18:22; 20:13 • Traditional View • Cult prostitute = • Inconsistent with context of Lev 18-20 • To‘evah refers to immorality (Pro 6:16-19; 28:9) • Different word used (sheqetz) eagle, lobster • Bad Analogies - severity of penalty
Texts • David and Jonathan • Revisionist View • David and Jonathan were lovers • “love...more wonderful than that of women” 2 Sam 1:26 • “Jonathan became one in spirit with David” 1 Sam 18:1 • “Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David” 1 Sam 18:4 • “They kissed each other and wept together” 1 Sam 20:41
Texts • David and Jonathan • Traditional View • The love of two men doesn’t have to be sexual • God’s love is more wonderful than that of women - does this mean it’s sexual? • One in spirit/soul, not flesh (1 Sam 18:1) • Never mentioned they had sex • David’s issue was women not menDavid and Jonathan had wives
Texts • Slavery • Revisionist View • Bible condones slavery and is wrong. Bible’s wrong on homosexuality as well. • Traditional View • Never condoned. Not a moral issue. • Ancient slavery ≠ modern slavery • Bible is critical of slave trade • Exo 21:16
Texts • Jesus’ Testimony • Revisionist View • Jesus was silent about homosexuality • Traditional View • Silent about bestiality, incest, etc. • Early Judaism never questioned the immorality of homosexuality • So silence speaks against revisionist view • Reaffirm biblical sexuality Mark 10:6-9 • High view of sexual purity, lust=adultery
Texts • Jesus on Eunuchs (Matt. 19:12) • Revisionist View • Eunuchs born that way. Eunuchs = gay. People are born gay. • Traditional View • ≠ gay man • This passage is about celibacy • Jesus affirms man/woman marriage in previous passage
Texts • Romans 1:26-27 • Revisionist Viewpara fusin • “Unnatural” means acting contrary to one’s sexual orientation • Traditional View • Straight men wouldn’t be “inflamed with lust for one another” (Rom 1:27) • Plato, Philo and Josephus used para fusin to refer to homosexuality
Texts • 1 Cor 6:9-10, 1 Tim 1:9-10 • Revisionist View • Traditional View • Arsenokoitai is from Lev 18:22 (LXX) • Male (arsen) + bed (koite) • There is a word for pederasty, paiderastēs