1 / 11

What is a Research Clinic?

What is a Research Clinic?. AIM: Research evidence for the effectiveness in clinical practice Naturalistic Setting Routine Outcomes Evaluation . Adherence to the Approach monitored Use of Standardised Measures. Research Clinic at Metanoia Institute: 2010/2011: Therapists.

studs
Download Presentation

What is a Research Clinic?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What is a Research Clinic? AIM: Research evidence for the effectiveness in clinical practice • Naturalistic Setting • Routine Outcomes Evaluation. • Adherence to the Approach monitored • Use of Standardised Measures

  2. Research Clinic at Metanoia Institute:2010/2011: Therapists • 67 therapists • TA 10.9% • Gestalt 12.8% • Person Centred 30.4% • Integrative Psychotherapy and Counselling Psychology 32.5%

  3. Research Clinic at Metanoia Institute:2010/2011: Clients • Number: 321 • Gender: 72% • Ethnicity: 67% White British, Black 33.4% 16.25% Asian • Age: 82.17% 20-49; 15.29% over 50 1.27% under 20.

  4. Research Sample

  5. OUTCOMES:

  6. LENGTH OF THERAPY • Group 1

  7. OUTCOMES GROUP 1 GROUP 2

  8. EFFECTIVENESS • GROUP 1 Improvement rates are significant (P<0.01), large effect size on all scores • GROUP 2 Improvement rates overall are not significant • GROUP 3 Significance at P<0.05 was achieved for PHQ-9, GAD-7, Core 10 and WAI with large effect sizes.

  9. WHICH VARIABLES ACCOUNT FOR CHANGE? • Severity (Pre Scores) and WAI accounted for a significant proportion of the variation (P < 0.05) ( higher scores at the outset more change, better working alliance more change) • No difference between theoretical orientation and improvement • No difference between number of sessions and improvement for group 1

  10. Difficulties of Evaluation within the Practice Setting • Pre and Post measures were less useful in research and practice (BDI-II,CORE 34) • Differences between individual therapists could not be calculated • No data on lack of engagement with a therapist

  11. Emerging Questions and Implications for further research • What does effectiveness in practice mean about efficacy? • What is the optimum length of therapy? • How do we develop the conditions for the initial engagement in therapy?

More Related