220 likes | 401 Views
Proton Improvement Plan (PIP) William Pellico Fermilab Annual Science and Technology Review September 5-7, 2012. PIP Outline. Brief Overview Startup of PIP Organization Documents FY12 Summary Milestones Budget labor Plans – FY13 Focus FY13 Goals Milestones Beyond FY13.
E N D
Proton Improvement Plan (PIP)William PellicoFermilab Annual Science and Technology ReviewSeptember 5-7, 2012
PIP Outline Brief Overview • Startup of PIP • Organization • Documents FY12 Summary • Milestones • Budget • labor Plans – FY13 Focus • FY13 Goals • Milestones • Beyond FY13 William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP – Planning Basis William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP FY12 Official startup year for PIP • Several Tasks underway were incorporated into PIP • Items identified by Task Force/PIP review made into Tasks • WBS Structure and managers identified • Management Plan and Design Handbook • Resource Loaded Schedule (RLS) was basedlined • Tracking of labor and M&S • Regular updates and planning meetings • Early effort to re-adjust labor and M&S to meet milestones • Significant changes to PIP funding • Labor Charges now included in budget allocation • Reduction in FY12 M&S • Labor Constraints William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Startup Timetable William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Technical and Managerial Control Documents William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Organization WBS Linac 1.1 Booster 1.2 RFQ-Injector 1.3 William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP RLS William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012 We currently have 30 WBS level 4 assignments being managed • Most tasks have multiple charge codes • Every task was reviewed, base lined, fully burdened and entered into the PIP RLS. Tasks were categorized then inputted into the RLS • Budget • PIP Goals • Labor • Engineering Constraints Several of the tasks are still being developed • Options being developed/reviewed
PIP FY12 Milestones William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
RFQ Injector Einzel Lens (Front of RFQ) New RFQ Injector Opened RFQ RFQ Injector Beam Tests RFQ Injector Diagnostic Line
Booster RF Cavity Modeling Refurbished Solid State Cavity Tuner Rebuild Spare Cavity Repaired Tuner Connection Ferrite Testing Failed Tuner Connection
PIP FY12 UTLILITES Power Distribution Vacuum Old Linac Transformer New Linac Transformer Updated Roughing Pumps LCWUpgrade New LCW Strainer System PIP PIP PIP PIP HQ Create Site Wide Monitoring Network New LCW Return System
Booster Notched Beam Absorber and Short Kickers Beam Loss Fast Short Kickers Power Loss New Notched Beam Absorber Tunnel Layout William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
New Notched Beam Absorber Simulations New Absorber Current Collimators New William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Budget Tables (FY12 and FY13) Base Lined PIP Budget Table : Labor cost not included Current FY12 : HLRF Ferrites William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
Budget Changes • Budget is pushing the schedule through at least FY 2018 William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012 17
Effects of FY13 Budget Reduction Break out effects by the pillars of PIP: • Pulse rate • Proton Throughput (losses) • Reliability • Modernization (addressing obsolescence) Above ordering used to prioritize for accommodating FY13 cuts These items are interconnected, e.g.: • Pushing rep rate can reduce reliability • Components are less reliable until modernized William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012 18
FY13 Milestones – Under Current Budget Planning The Booster solid state upgrades were given priority and remain on schedule after the FY13 budget cuts to PIP. William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Major Milestone OutlookPIP has not been funded as we would have liked – outlying milestones/schedule will be impacted • 7.5 Hz: Out of the Shutdown • 1 e17 / hr: Out of the Shutdown • Solid State /Rep Rate Testing • Cavity Refurbishment Selection • Aperture Scans * New estimates to be determined in September ** Completion depends upon funding profile William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
PIP Summary Organizational structure completed PIP goals and management controls completed and documented All level 0,1 milestones for FY12 will be completed Resource Loaded Schedule – control process underway Booster Solid State given priority and on schedule RFQ injector – initial issues resolved and install started Budget issues have and will continue to drive schedule • FY13 will be difficult (>50 % budget reduction) • An updated RLS will be generated in FY13 Q1 William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012
Wise people once said…. William Pellico, Fermilab Annual S&T Review, Sept. 5-7, 2012