1 / 23

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Nov 2010

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Nov 2010. Developing Requirements. The Requirements Environment Sequence of events Analysis Initial Documentation Transitions to actions that provide solutions Non-Materiel solutions

sylvia-edwards
Download Presentation

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Nov 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)Nov 2010

  2. Developing Requirements • The Requirements Environment • Sequence of events • Analysis • Initial Documentation • Transitions to actions that provide solutions • Non-Materiel solutions • JCIDS interactions with developing materiel solutions • Requirements Approval structure

  3. The Requirements Environment Finding the balance between: COCOM near-term requirements to support CONPLANs and current missions Services’ long range vision & investment plans and Systems optimized for service missions and Versatile, joint systems Fiscal & political constraints Growing demands and Geographic specificity and Worldwide applicability Achievable acquisition strategy Ambitious requirements and Quantity matters and High-end capabilities

  4. ICD CDD Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD JCIDS and Acquisition • Analysis of Alternatives • Technology Development Strategy • Test & Eval Strategy • SoS System Engineering • Affordable military-useful increment • Technology demonstrated • Initial KPPs/KSAs • TEMP • SEP • Revise KPPs/KSAs • Detailed design • System integration • TEMP • DT&E • LRIP • IOT&E • GDF • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transforma-tion Capabilities-Based Assessment • LRIP • FOT&E • Non-materiel solutions • Potential Materiel approaches • S&T initiatives • Experimentation • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Gaps • Shortfalls • Redundancies • Risk areas Materiel Development Decision MS “A” MS “B” MS “C” activity Select Joint Integrating Concept Engineering & Manufacturing Development Develop CONOPS Technology Development Materiel Solution Analysis Production & Deployment Capabilities-Based Assessment CPD COCOM Analysis of Alternatives Competitive Prototyping Army Navy Evolutionary Acquisition USMC OSD/JCS COCOMs Air Force FCB Services OSD (AT&L) DIA OSD (NII) OSD (PA&E) oversight SECDEF OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Capabilities Definition Develop, Test & Produce Select Materiel Solution Policy Getting the front end right is key

  5. Capabilities-Based Assessment Existing Guidance What we need for the mission NEEDS The problems and the risks GAPS What should we do about it? SOLUTIONS Where does this need rank? How soon do we need it? JCIDS Review

  6. Identifying Needs and Potential Solutions • CBA Recommendations: • Transformational solutions • Evolution of existing capabilities • Information technology solutions • Information for an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) • Managers must communicate to avoid disconnects over seams between JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE • CBA Documentation: • Initial Capabilities Document • DOTmLPF Change Recommendation

  7. CBA Output Documents Initial Capabilities Document (MS A) Documents Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) Results – specifically Capability Gaps Identifies relevant operational performance attributes Documents the recommendation on the need for a materiel solution and potential non-material solutions Predecessor for the Capabilities Development Document Key review question: How to prioritize warfighting gaps?

  8. Operational Performance Attributes • Attributes necessary to design a proposed system • Establish a performance baseline • Guide development and demonstration • Guide development of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) for inclusion in Capabilities Development Document

  9. CBA Output Documents Joint DCR – DOTmLPF Change Request When DoD Decides a Joint Non- Materiel Solution is appropriate Non-Materiel Solutions Change policy Change doctrine Reorganize Train and educate DOD personnel differently Acquire commercial or non-developmental items Acquire more quantities of existing items Add or reassign personnel Move or realign facilities Sometimes Called DOT_LPF

  10. ICD CDD Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD JCIDS and Acquisition • Analysis of Alternatives • Technology Development Strategy • Test & Eval Strategy • SoS System Engineering • Affordable military-useful increment • Technology demonstrated • Initial KPPs/KSAs • TEMP • SEP • Revise KPPs/KSAs • Detailed design • System integration • TEMP • DT&E • LRIP • IOT&E • GDF • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transforma-tion Capabilities-Based Assessment • LRIP • FOT&E • Non-materiel solutions • Potential Materiel approaches • S&T initiatives • Experimentation • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Gaps • Shortfalls • Redundancies • Risk areas Materiel Development Decision MS “A” MS “B” MS “C” activity Select Joint Integrating Concept Engineering & Manufacturing Development Develop CONOPS Technology Development Materiel Solution Analysis Production & Deployment Capabilities-Based Assessment CPD COCOM Analysis of Alternatives Competitive Prototyping Army Navy Evolutionary Acquisition USMC OSD/JCS COCOMs Air Force FCB Services OSD (AT&L) DIA OSD (NII) OSD (PA&E) oversight SECDEF OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Capabilities Definition Develop, Test & Produce Select Materiel Solution Policy COCOM/Service Near-term Capabilities As part of the agileprocess IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc. PPBE (PDM, PBD) JRAC

  11. Key JCIDS Development Documents • Capability Development Document (MS B) • Defines Performance Requirements to Achieve the Capability • Identifies KPPs, KSAs, and additional attributes • Attributes should be Authoritative, Measurable and Testable • Describes DOTMLPF and Policy Constraints associated with the solution • May describe multiple increments • Provides operational capabilities for the acquisition strategy and the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) • Insert all CDD KPPs and Sustainment KSAs verbatim into the APB

  12. Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) • Attributes or characteristics of a system • Critical or essential • To develop an effective military capability • To make a significant contribution to the characteristics of the future joint force • KPPs must be testable • Enable feedback from T&E • Mandatory vs. Selectively applied KPPs • Net Ready KPP, Sustainment KPP • Training KPP, Energy Efficiency KPP • Validated by the JROC for JROC interest documents • Failure to meet a KPP results in reevaluation or reassessment of the program

  13. Key System Attributes (KSAs) • Attributes most critical or essential • Not selected as a KPP • An additional level of capability prioritization below the KPP • Only senior leadership can change a KSA • Sponsor 4-star • Defense Agency Commander • Principal Staff Assistant

  14. JCIDS and Acquisition ICD CDD Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD • Analysis of Alternatives • Technology Development Strategy • Test & Eval Strategy • SoS System Engineering • Affordable military-useful increment • Technology demonstrated • Initial KPPs/KSAs • TEMP • SEP • Revise KPPs/KSAs • Detailed design • System integration • TEMP • DT&E • LRIP • IOT&E • GDF • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transforma-tion Capabilities-Based Assessment • LRIP • FOT&E • Non-materiel solutions • Potential Materiel approaches • S&T initiatives • Experimentation • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Gaps • Shortfalls • Redundancies • Risk areas Materiel Development Decision MS “A” MS “B” MS “C” activity Select Joint Integrating Concept Engineering & Manufacturing Development Develop CONOPS Technology Development Materiel Solution Analysis Production & Deployment Capabilities-Based Assessment CPD COCOM Analysis of Alternatives Competitive Prototyping Army Navy Evolutionary Acquisition USMC OSD/JCS COCOMs Air Force FCB Services OSD (AT&L) DIA OSD (NII) OSD (PA&E) oversight SECDEF OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Capabilities Definition Develop, Test & Produce Select Materiel Solution Policy COCOM/Service Near-term Capabilities As part of the agileprocess IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc. PPBE (PDM, PBD) JRAC

  15. Key JCIDS Development Documents • Capability Production Document (MS C) • Supports Production and Development of one increment • Documents Authoritative, Testable Capabilities • Support Production, Testing, and Deployment • May describe Incremental Production and Deployment • No New Requirements • Must meet Operational Performance Attributes

  16. JCIDS and Acquisition ICD CDD Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD • Analysis of Alternatives • Technology Development Strategy • Test & Eval Strategy • SoS System Engineering • Affordable military-useful increment • Technology demonstrated • Initial KPPs/KSAs • TEMP • SEP • Revise KPPs/KSAs • Detailed design • System integration • TEMP • DT&E • LRIP • IOT&E • GDF • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transforma-tion Capabilities-Based Assessment • LRIP • FOT&E • Non-materiel solutions • Potential Materiel approaches • S&T initiatives • Experimentation • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Gaps • Shortfalls • Redundancies • Risk areas Materiel Development Decision MS “A” MS “B” MS “C” activity Select Joint Integrating Concept Engineering & Manufacturing Development Develop CONOPS Technology Development Materiel Solution Analysis Production & Deployment Capabilities-Based Assessment CPD COCOM Analysis of Alternatives Competitive Prototyping Army Navy Evolutionary Acquisition USMC OSD/JCS COCOMs Air Force FCB Services OSD (AT&L) DIA OSD (NII) OSD (PA&E) oversight SECDEF OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Capabilities Definition Develop, Test & Produce Select Materiel Solution Policy COCOM/Service Near-term Capabilities As part of the agileprocess IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc. PPBE (PDM, PBD) JRAC

  17. Differences Between the CDD and the CPD

  18. Requirements Decision Chain JROC DECISION CHAIN JROC MEMBERSHIP • Chair: VCJCS • Council Members: • Vice Chief of Staff, Army • Vice Chief of Naval Operations • Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force • Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY CJCS CJCS ADVICE TO SECDEF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/ JROC JROC TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE JCB ISSUE DEVELOPMENT FCB INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW FCB WG ANALYTIC FOUNDATION JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight Council JCB: Joint Capabilities Board FCB: Functional Capabilities Board FCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group COCOMs must be consulted and have a standing invitation to attend all JROC sessions; AT&L, CAPE, and Comptroller attend as JROC advisors

  19. JROC Organization JROC DECISION CHAIN JROC MEMBERSHIP • Chair: VCJCS • Council Members: • Vice Chief of Staff, Army • Vice Chief of Naval Operations • Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force • Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY CJCS CJCS ADVICE TO SECDEF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/ JROC JROC TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE JCB ISSUE DEVELOPMENT FCB INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW FCB WG ANALYTIC FOUNDATION JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight Council JCB: Joint Capabilities Board FCB: Functional Capabilities Board FCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group COCOMs have a standing invitation toattend all JROC sessions. CAPE, AT&L and Comptroller are formal advisors

  20. Functional Capability Boards Command & Control Force Support Battlespace Awareness Logistics Force Application Building Partnerships Protection Net-Centric FCB Membership: (O-6 level – not all-inclusive) Services Combatant Command Reps OSD (AT&L) OSD (I) Comptroller ASD NII/ DOD CIO OSD(P) D, CAPE DOT&E DIA Rep (Threat) ODNI/IRB Other DoD Agencies as necessary

  21. JCIDS Gatekeeper • Perform an initial review of all JCIDS proposals • Support provided by J6, J8, FCB WGs • The Gatekeeper will determine: • Joint Potential Designator • JROC Interest • JCB Interest • Joint Integration • Joint Information • Independent • Lead and supporting Functional Capabilities Boards • Formal Staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions

  22. JCIDS Tracks FCB Review JROC JROC Interest JCB Staffing ACAT I proposals FCB Review JCB Interest JCB Staffing ACAT II & III proposals requiring a joint review Joint Integration Sponsor Certification Staffing ACAT II & III proposals requiring certifications only Joint Information Sponsor Staffing ACAT II & III proposals with multi-component interest Sponsor Independent Validation Authority ACAT II & III component unique proposals FCB Review JROC JCB Tripwires ACAT I programs with 10% cost growth

  23. JCIDS Summary • The need for flexible capabilities • Begin with analysis • Analysis leads to action • Non-Materiel solutions • The DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) • Materiel solutions • Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) • Capability Development Document (CDD) • Capability Production Document (CPD) • Process is under review to improve timeliness and aid in improved acquisition performance

More Related