1 / 31

Tigard 2035 TSP

Tigard 2035 TSP . City Council Public Hearing October 12, 2010. TSP Organization. Volume 1. TSP Policy & plan substance Volume 2. Supporting Information For reference Volume 3. Background Technical memoranda. TSP Organization. Introduction Goals and Policies

symona
Download Presentation

Tigard 2035 TSP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tigard 2035 TSP City Council Public Hearing October 12, 2010

  2. TSP Organization • Volume 1. TSP • Policy & plan substance • Volume 2. Supporting Information • For reference • Volume 3. Background • Technical memoranda

  3. TSP Organization • Introduction • Goals and Policies • Transportation Planning Toolbox • Development of the TSP • Transportation System Plan • Transportation Funding Element • Glossary

  4. 1. Introduction • Initiated in 2007 • Funded by TGM Grant • Agency partners • ODOT • DLCD • Metro • TriMet • Washington County • Beaverton • Tualatin • TVF&R

  5. 1. Introduction • Element of the Comprehensive Plan • TSP Purpose • Long-range plan for growth • Coordinate with land use planning • Coordination with other agencies • Blueprint for transportation investments • Required by State of Oregon • Required for Federal funds

  6. 1. Introduction • Building on Past Efforts • Current TSP (2002) • WSRC Plan • Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan • Tigard Highway 99W Improvement Plan • Wash. Co. 2020 Transportation Plan • 2035 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)

  7. 1. Introduction • Planning Environment • Growing congestion • Natural & constructed barriers • Limited transportation funds • Rising fuel costs • Environmental impacts • Make the Most of What We Have!!

  8. 1. Introduction • Public Involvement • Web site • Cityscape articles (5) • Public Forums (2) • Open House (1)  • Civic Group Outreach (4) • Citizen Advisory Committee • Planning Commission Work Sessions

  9. 2. Goals & Policies • Coordination with Land Use • Transportation Efficiency • Multi-Modal System • Safety • Inter-Agency Coordination • Transportation Funding

  10. 3. Toolbox • Informational Section • Tools & terms

  11. 3. Toolbox • Travel Mode Shares • Land Use • Connectivity/Circulation • Transportation System Management • Traffic signal improvements • Access management • Neighborhood traffic management

  12. 3. Toolbox • Transportation Demand Management • Coordination for alternative travel modes • Specific Projects • Walkways & crossing treatments • Bicycle facilities

  13. 4. Development of the TSP • 2008 Baseline Conditions Analysis • 2035 Forecast Analysis • 9,000 households (34%) • 25,000 jobs (57%) • Growth in the surrounding area

  14. 4. Development of the TSP Household Growth: 34%

  15. 4. Development of the TSP Employment Growth: 57%

  16. 4. Development of the TSP • Reinforcing Congested Travel Patterns Morning Rush Hour Evening Rush Hour

  17. 4. Development of the TSP • Reliance on a Few Major Roadways • Connectivity Barriers • Highway 217 • Railroad/WES Track • Fanno Creek • Topography • Existing Neighborhoods

  18. 4. Development of the TSP The Challenge  • Congestion is already a problem • Growth will make it worse • Connectivity barriers

  19. 4. Development of the TSP Strategies  • Land Use Changes • Connectivity • Multi-Modal Improvements • Systems Operating Improvements • Management/Design Measures

  20. 4. Development of the TSP • Project Evaluation • Evaluation Criteria • Multimodal mobility • System capacity • Interagency consistency • Safety • Cost effectiveness • Environmental resources • Environmental equity

  21. 4. Development of the TSP • Significant New Projects • Plan for HCT from Portland to Sherwood • Hwy 217 over-crossing at N Dakota-Pfaffle • Updated Projects • Reduced planned cross sections (Hall Blvd, 121st, and Walnut). • Hwy 217 Northern WSRC over-crossing changed to pedestrian/bicycle only

  22. 4. Development of the TSP • Significant Projects Removed • Wall Street extension across Fanno Creek and RR switching yard • Nimbus Road extension to Greenburg • Significant Projects Retained • Hwy 217 Overpass at Hunziker/Hampton • Ash Avenue Fanno Creek Bridge • Walnut Street Extension to Ash Avenue

  23. 5. Transportation System Plan • Management, Design & Operations • Multimodal Projects

  24. 5a. Management & Operations • Land Use Planning • Functional Classifications • Street Design Standards • Connectivity Standards • Transportation System Management • Transportation Demand Management • Travel Modes • Parking Management

  25. 5a. Management & Operations • Additional Studies

  26. 5b. Projects • Nearly 150 Multimodal Projects • Roadways • Complete Streets • Bicycle Facilities • Sidewalks • Multi-Use Trails • Transit Improvements • Transportation System Management

  27. 5b. Projects • High Level Evaluation & Planning • Range in Certainty • Pacific Highway-99W/Hall intersection vs. Hall Blvd bridge to Tualatin • Range in Project Scale • Commercial Street sidewalks vs. Highway 217 interchange

  28. 5b. Projects • Financially Constrained Projects • “Reasonably likely” • Includes all expected resources • Eligible for federal funds • Included in 2035 RTP • Zone/Comp plan amendments

  29. 6. Funding Element • Historical Capital Revenue • Revenue Forecast for Capital Projects • $69 Million over 25 years • Total TSP Projects • $657 Million • Prioritized Projects • $283 Million • Includes all funding sources

  30. 7. Implementation • Identifies measures to ensure development code reflects the updated policies

  31. Potential Council Actions • Approve as Recommended by Planning Commission • Approve with Changes • Reject

More Related