1 / 21

LEADING INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS

LEADING INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS. Office of Institutional Research and Planning www.humboldt.edu/irp . GRIP GOALS. Increase Graduation Rates for all students by 12% by 2015 Increase Graduation Rates for URM students by 15% by 2015 Need an 80% FTF retention rate to stay on track.

taariq
Download Presentation

LEADING INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LEADING INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS Office of Institutional Research and Planning www.humboldt.edu/irp

  2. GRIP GOALS • Increase Graduation Rates for all students by 12% by 2015 • Increase Graduation Rates for URM students by 15% by 2015 • Need an 80% FTF retention rate to stay on track

  3. US News and World Report • HSU fell from 37th in 2011 to 48th in 2012 and 10th to 15th for Western Region Publics • The TOP CSU’s are • SLO • LB • Pomona • Chico • Fullerton • Fresno • San Jose • Sonoma All rank higher than HSU

  4. Data Analysis • Ten Years of Longitudinal Data 2000-2010 • Benchmarks of Educational Success and Non Success • Track Students from Freshman through Senior • Measure Achievement Gaps Between Males and Females and URM and Non-URM Students

  5. First-Time Freshmen AVG 2000-2010 Fall 2011 55% Female 56% Female 30% URM 38% URM 44% From Southern CA 36% From Southern CA 37% Low Income 32% Low Income 45% First Generation 50% First Generation 84% Live on Campus 82% Live on Campus 15% Undeclared 17% Undeclared Average SAT: 1042 Average SAT: 1022 Average HGPA 3.15 Average HGPA 3.18

  6. First Year Benchmarks Fall 2009 Cohort

  7. Second Year Benchmarks Fall 2009 Cohort

  8. Two Key Retention Issues:

  9. Key Retention/Graduation Issues: Remediation • Remedial Math students are less successful in subsequent gateway math courses • Dual remedial students are17% less likely to graduate in 6 years than non remedial students • Dual remedial students on probation have a 16% chance of graduating within 6 years

  10. Interventions for Remedial Students • Mandatory First Year Freshmen Experience (FYFE) for all single and dual remedial students • Course transformations in Remedial Math and English • Use of the Learning center, Tutorial Services and Supplemental Instruction • Early Start that identifies College Readiness

  11. Key Retention/Graduation issues: Academic Probation • 20% of Freshmen are on Academic Probation or Disqualification at the end of the First Year • Half of all probationary/disqualified students drop out after their first year • 18% graduate within 6 years • Probationary students are more likely to have a HSGPA <3.0 • Are more likely to be male and/or URM • Accumulate less units after their first semester

  12. Interventions for Students on Academic Probation • Identify FTF on Academic Probation after 1st semester • Enroll in Intrusive Academic Probation Counseling • Measure students who go off probation by end of 1st year and track students who remain on probation • Measure retention the next fall

  13. Recommended Retention Measures • Intervention for Students who don’t Pass Remediation the First Time • Measure subsequent course success • Provide SI in Gateway Courses with high failure rates of remedial and at risk students • Intervention for students on Academic Probation after first term and ongoing advising for all students on academic probation

  14. More Recommended Retention Measures • Don’t admit exceptional admits and provide early intervention for at risk high school students with a HSGPA<3.0 • Major Advisement for Undeclared Students • Training on Using DARS for Academic Plan • Provide Undergraduate Research Opportunities and Peer Mentor Opportunities

  15. Six Year Graduation Rates • Increase in Graduation Rates from the previous year • Ongoing Gaps between Males and Females • And URM and Non-URM students

  16. Students Who Leave • 36% Attend a Community College • 14% Transfer to Another CSU • Leave Primarily for Financial or Academic Reasons • Have a Hard Time Finding Jobs (especially first time freshmen) • Compounding Effect of the Economy

  17. WASC’s Institutional Review Process 2012-2013 • Disaggregated retention and graduation rates • Retention and graduation rates benchmarked to peer institutions • The timing of attrition • Analysis of non-graduates and other subgroup differences • Specific plans to improve retention, graduation, and overall success rates • Targets for future performance. • Ralph Wolff, WASC Senior

  18. Research-Identified Areas Necessary to Increase Retention • Monitor student progress their first and second year for GPA and units completed, and implement appropriate interventions • Track students who don’t complete general education requirement and don’t stay on their degree timeline • Supply financial aid and work study to the students with highest need • Provide GE advising for upper division transfer students • Increase Supplemental Instruction, especially for URM students • All students should fill out the FAFSA regardless of perceived need (since circumstances change)

  19. Additional Areas of Research • Track seniors to make sure they are on schedule for timely degree completion • Collect additional data on males and URM males to better understand their educational trajectory • Track students who leave or are in danger of leaving HSU

More Related