110 likes | 221 Views
Windturbines vs Radiosystems Stefan Mattsson Swedish Telecom Agency (PTS). Content. Deployment Impact Protection Responsibility Web-site Vindlov Permission process FS-deployment in the surroundings to Onsala. Deployment of the wind.
E N D
Windturbines vs RadiosystemsStefan MattssonSwedish Telecom Agency (PTS)
Content • Deployment • Impact • Protection • Responsibility • Web-site Vindlov • Permission process • FS-deployment in the surroundings to Onsala
Deployment of the wind • Sweden (2007) : 1 % of the country’s net electricity consumption • Corresponds to 1.4 TWh • Political decision (2002): • Production of 30 TWh prior to 2020 • Germany: 7,5 % (Source: GWEC, Global Wind Energy Council) • Spain: 11 %
Impact on radiosystems • Conducted studies confirms that fixed systems like Radar-, RadioRelay, Brodcasting-systems and RAS may experience disturbances due to obstruction and/or reflection caused by turbines. • In the case of Radars, shadowing and/or reflexions is the main problem when considering off-shore windturbines vs coastal surveillance radars. • The potential for these disturbances depends on the size of the turbine, material, location in relation to the ”victim” etc • For RAS, even EMC caused by the generator may cause disturbance in case the separation distance is not sufficiently large.
Protection • Exclusion zone around the RAS-site may provide sufficient protection if the zone is large enough. • Guidance on this zone, given by international recommendation(s), would be useful?
Responsibility of the Swedish agency • Provide, to the operator of wind turbines, a list of potentially concerned operators of radiosystems in a certain geographical area. • The intention with this procedur is to establish a ”marriage” between concerned operators with the objective to create a fruitful environment for coordination. • It should be noted that the agency is not responsible for the licensing of turbines. This issue is handled by the local authorities. • The agency is responsible for the protection of radio services only.
Web-site Vindlov (www.vindlov.se) - Swedish Energy Agency responsible for this site developed in cooperation with 20 authorities (incl the telecom agency) • - The objective is to provide information covering all aspects of the complicated process of licensing
Onshore Offshore Mini turbine 1 piece, < 20m, rotor ø < 3m Internal waters All internal bodies of water Farm turbine* 1 piece, 20-50 m, rotor ø > 3m Territorial sea Sweden’s Economic Zone Wind park – M 1 piece > 50 m OR≥ 2 pieces ≤ 150 m Wind park – L ≥ 2 pieces > 150 m OR ≥ 7 pieces > 120 m Permission/licensing process-Classification of wind turbines * incl. building mounted turbines
Onshore Offshore Mini Int. waters Farm Terr. Sea Park - M Park - L Permission/licensing process - guiding legislation & requirements EC/FMHa, CS Act Environmental permit, water activity permit & municipal grant (veto) P&B Act No permit required P&B Act Building permit SEZ Act, CS Act Government permit P&B Act, EC/FMHa, code C 40.100 Building permit & notification acc. Environmental Code Building notification All classes except for Mini turbines and Territorial sea! EC/FMHa, code B 40.90 and B 40.95 Environmental permit &municipal grant
Windfarm in the northern part of Sweden • 1 101 # of turbines • 2 500 – 4 000 MW total power • 8 – 12 TWh energy/year