1 / 6

Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance

Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided Howard Price, Principal Policy Officer, CIEH.

tahir
Download Presentation

Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided Howard Price, Principal Policy Officer, CIEH

  2. What is the Statutory Guidance?- the principle piece of procedural guidance to regulators- made under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990- local authorities must act in accordance with it (quasi- legislation)- originally made in 2000 – additions made in 2006- substantially revised in April 2012 Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided

  3. Why did Defra revise it?- `major flaws`- `undermined the effectiveness of the regime`- `created regulatory uncertainty`butthe real reason was the failure to deliver policy-compliant technical guidance which would `represent contaminant concentrations which may pose unacceptable risks to health` Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided

  4. How did Defra revise it?What`contaminated`means is no longer based on`the amount of pollutant…which a human receptor might take in…would represent an unacceptable intake…assessed on the basis of its toxicological properties`but on whether`the authority is aware that similar land or situations are known or are strongly suspected…to have caused such harm before` Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided

  5. How did Defra revise it?In addition, - where the decision is not clear-cut, the authority should consider the social and environmental costs of remediation- `if it is established that land is at or close to normal levels…it should usually not be considered further`.- other changes, e.g. - to `significant harm` - `the …authority should consider the number of people who might be exposed to the risk…` - purported restrictions on investigations Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided

  6. ConclusionsThe revised text fails to meet its stated objectives Its justification was incredible, the changes are not only poorly crafted but are reckless in their effectIn particular, the line between `contaminated` and not `contaminated`- between unacceptable risk and (remember) still some risk - remains as unclear as before Deeds not words How recent revisions to the Statutory Guidance have weakened the protection provided

More Related