50 likes | 184 Views
Effectiveness and downside risks of employing firm-controlled agents to calm down online firestorms. 12 th OUIWS, Harvard Business School, 2014. by Nik Franke, Thomas Funke, Peter Keinz, and Alfred Taudes. Phenomenon and research question.
E N D
Effectiveness and downside risks of employing firm-controlled agents to calm down online firestorms 12th OUIWS, Harvard Business School, 2014 by Nik Franke, Thomas Funke, Peter Keinz, and Alfred Taudes
Phenomenon and research question In this project, we explore a strategy to calm down emerging online firestorms. Online firestorms “… a sudden discharge of large quantities of [...] complaint behavior against a [...] company [...] in social media networks.“ 1 Major threat to a company’s reputation2 Research questions: 1.) Can agents of protection effectively help to calm down online firestorms? 2.) Which factors influence their effectiveness? NikFranke: hey guys, calm down a bit. singtel is setting up the 4G network to improve their service to all of us...so they do care for us…and by the way: i‘ve never experienced any problems …i‘drecommendtheirservicetomyfriends ...
Method We used case-based agent-based modeling to investigate the RQs. Step 1: Building the model Literature review to derive a general model on opinion diffusion3 Case study to gain data about a real-life online firestorm Step 2: Validating the model Simulation (1st model) # of peers participating Real conflict time Variation of - number & roles agents- community characteristics Step 3: Running experiments t1 t3
Preliminary findings & next steps Agents of protection can significantly affect online firestorms. • Robust patterns across all scenarios: • Agents of protection • reduce intensity, speed, and duration of an online firestorm (p<.001) • increase the average attitude towards the company after an online firestorm (p<.001) No agents of protection t3 10 opinionleaders as agents of protection t1 t3 • Next steps: • Extending the model to account for effects triggered by un-covered agents of protection • Attempt to find “optimal” infiltration strategy
Thank you for your attention! Literature: 1) Pfeffer, J., T. Zorbach, and K. M. Carley. "Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks." Journal of Marketing Communications 20.1-2 (2014): 117-128. 2) Stich, L., G. Golla, and A. Nanopoulos. "Modelling the spread of negative word-of-mouth in online social networks." Journal of Decision Systems 23.2 (2014): 203-221. 3) Hegselmann, R, and U. Krause. "Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation." Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5.3 (2002). Miller, K.D., F. Fabian, and S. Lin. "Strategies for online communities." Strategic Management Journal 30.3 (2009): 305-322.