1 / 19

The Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility

The Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility. Building the infrastructure for excellence in Measurement Logan Utah, Aug 24, 2004 John Selker et al. Current Team (CUAHSI Selected). John Selker . Oregon State University. HMF Pilot facility oversight

tamyra
Download Presentation

The Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility Building the infrastructure for excellence in Measurement Logan Utah, Aug 24, 2004 John Selker et al.

  2. Current Team (CUAHSI Selected) • John Selker. Oregon State University. HMF Pilot facility oversight • Rosemary Knight. Stanford. Geophysical techniques in Hydrology • Jennifer Jacobs. University of New Hampshire. Direct Physical Measurement • John Durant. Tufts University. Methods • Breck Bowden. Univ. Vermont. Biogeohydrology

  3. Thanks to Previous Committees! • Witold F. Krajewski, University of Iowa (Vice-Chair) • Dave Carlson, NCAR • Bill Eichenger, University Iowa • Ty Ferre, University Arizona • James Fowler, IRIS • Gordon Grant, USDA Corvallis • Jack Hermance, Brown University • Jeff McDonnell, Oregon State University • Marc Parlange, Johns Hopkins University • Ken Potter, University Wisconsin • Tammo Steenhuis, Cornell University • Laura Toran, Temple University • Scott Tyler, University of Nevada Reno

  4. A brief history • Marc Parlange headed 1999-2001 with Selker and others. • Selker took over in 2001 to work with Roger Bales on first NSF CUAHSI proposal. • Three years of rough sledding 2001-2004. • Submitted proposal July 16, 2004. • NSF budget cut 2% Aug 2004.

  5. Motivation • We are at a time of unprecedented opportunity in measurement; • Our sister earth sciences have demonstrated the power of community infrastructure; • The time was right – Need; Opportunity; NSF interest, Community interest.

  6. HMF Data: the prescription for clearer vision in hydrologic measurement! Better Elevation Different Prediction (Black lines landslides) (From Bill Dietrich)

  7. Example of how resistance tomography illuminates the sub-surface geohydrologic setting.

  8. Objective To improve the efficiency with which hydrologic science is conducted by individuals and Teams Method • Getting state-of-the-art instrumentation into scientists’ hands. • Diffuse knowledge of instrumentation techniques • Provide direct assistance in use of complex measurement systems

  9. The Audience • Observatories – design, implementation, operations • NSF PI’s – support of high-cost/complex instrumentation on individual grants • The Hydrologic Community – Establish standards of measurement and bridges between owners/users

  10. The Pilot HMF • We are not starting with a mini-HMF. • The Pilot HMF tasks focus on developing processes through experimentation with direct service: • How can we make win-win instrument sharing within the community? • How will we support systems where expertise and tools must be delivered? • How do we support individual PI’s who submit proposals which should include support?

  11. Components • Geophysics (Knight - Stanford) • workshop in year 1; implementation yrs 2-3 • Direct Physical Measurement (Jacobs – Univ NH) • workshop in year 1; implementation yrs 2-3 • Biogeohydrology (Breck – Univ Vermont) • workshop in year 2; implementation yr 3 • Measurement Methods (Durant – Tufts) • Peer-reviewed web-handbook of techniques • Prototype Facility (Selker – OSU) • Staffed in yrs 2-3

  12. Staffing • Two PhD’s in year 1; one more in year 2. Each is responsible to establish a particular component of the HMF

  13. Some Brass Tacks: Observatories • Design phase • Provide support for instrumentation selection. • Provide for consistency and scalability within and across HO’s. • Implementation phase • Assist in arrangements for one-time geophysical and topographic surveys • Assist in obtaining expertise and instrumentation as needed.

  14. Supporting Individual PI Proposals • The HMF will work with PI’s as needed to identify technologies and assess feasibility of concepts • The PI will include HMF tools and staff as no-cost aspects of the project in proposal • The HMF will certify to the NSF panel feasibility and cost • The HMF will work with PI’s as a service organization

  15. Demand-driven model for CUASHI/HMTF Pre-award activities Proposal development PI-Idea driven Proposal submission (Fastlane) NSF mail-out review NSF panel discussion HMTF first cut Feasibility & costing Project scoping, costing, & planning HMTF Resource Management: - sub-contracting - purchasing - development HMTF refined scoping & costing NSF authorization Investigator planning HMTF planning Project implementation • HMTF Resource Inventory: • human • equipment Field deployment Field breakdown HMTF Capacity Building Data reduction, reporting, publication HMTF interpretation Project Performance Appraisal feedback/learning Investigator performance appraisal HMTF performance appraisal NSF performance appraisal

  16. Tangible Outcomes of Pilot HMF • Access USGS HIF and other sites “Instrumentation Marketplace” • Unified peer-reviewed methods:The “web Handbook” • Foundation for instrumentation library (eventually with precip radars, LIDAR, Doppler current meters, etc.) • Training courses on cutting edge technologies • Support of HO development, characterization, and infrastructure

  17. Key Points • HMF model is demand driven. It can grow according to usage. • Bring Consistency and Robustness to HO measurements. • Collective resource to enhance access to tools, measurement quality and frequency • The Full HMF will be competitively awarded by the NSF (We had hoped to do the Pilot this way, but was not possible)

  18. What Next? The Full HMF!!! • Develop new tools • Sabbatical/Post-doc opportunities • Staff with deep expertise • Schedule of training short courses • Schedule of strategic Workshops • Great Tools! • LIDAR; Radar; Geophysics; Eddy covariance; submersibles; pilot-less planes; networked sensors; subsurface biogeochemical …

  19. HMF Directors Council (HDC) NSF Programs Manager CUAHSI Director HTMF Director Administrative Assistant to the Director Budgets and Finance Facilities Advisory Panel Land/Atmospheric processes Chief Scientist Surface Water Chief Scientist Subsurface Chief Scientist Administrative Assistant Administrative Assistant Administrative Assistant Technical Support(2cnd) Technical Support(2cnd) Technical Support(2cnd) Specialists: Precipitation Evaporation Specialists: Stream Monitoring Soil-Water Specialists: Geophysics Well Testing Post doc- visiting scientist Post doc- visiting scientist Post doc- visiting scientist The HMF yrs 3, 4, 5 ???

More Related