1 / 5

Reliability of brain-computer interface language sample transcription procedures

Reliability of brain-computer interface language sample transcription procedures. Katya Hill, PhD, CCC-SLP; Thomas Kovacs, MA; Sangeun Shin. Aim

tareq
Download Presentation

Reliability of brain-computer interface language sample transcription procedures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reliability of brain-computer interface language sample transcriptionprocedures Katya Hill, PhD, CCC-SLP; Thomas Kovacs, MA; Sangeun Shin

  2. Aim • Test reliability of transcribing language samples of daily brain-computer interface (BCI) communication recorded as language activity monitoring (LAM) logfiles. • Relevance • Establishing reliable transcription procedures is important for reporting valid measures as study results and evaluating overall effectiveness of expressive communication.

  3. Method • Veterans with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis used P300-based BCI as augmentative and alternative communication system. • KeyLAM software recorded logfiles in universal logfile format during use of BCI-controlled email and word processing applications. • These logfiles were encrypted and sent to our laboratory for decryption, transcription, and analysis.

  4. Results • Results on transcription of 345 daily logfile samples. • Procedure was accurate across transcribers/ raters. • Interrater reliability (frequency of agreement ratio) • Total number of words: 97.6%. • Total utterances: 93.5% . • Interjudge agreement • 100% for both measures.

  5. Conclusion • Transcribing language samples using LAM data is highly reliable and fidelity of process can be maintained. • LAM data supported transcription of large number of samples that could not have been completed using audio and video recordings.

More Related