E N D
1. SCEA International Conference and Educational Workshop
June, 2004
2. We Are Vought
3. Vought History The Legacy of the Vought Name Dates Back to 1917 When Chance Vought Co-founded the Lewis & Vought Corp (LTV).
1992, LTV Sold Its Aircraft Division Assets to The Carlyle Group and Northrop Corp, Creating a New Company Named Vought Aircraft Company.
1994, Northrop, Concurrently With Its Purchase of Grumman Aerospace, Acquired Vought Aircraft Company From Carlyle
2000, The Carlyle Group Purchased Northrop Grumman's Aerostructures Business Group, Creating a New Company.
The New Business Uses the Heritage Name Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. And Remains Based in Dallas.
2003, Vought Acquired The Aerostructures Corporation; Currently in Transition to Integrate Operations
Today, Vought Aircraft Industries Is a Major Subcontractor on Many Commercial and Military Aircraft Programs.
7. Systems Engineering Cost Estimating Systems Engineering Cost Estimating
Apply on Expert Systems and Math Models
Provide ROM Estimates When Detail Design Is Not Available
Establish Design to Cost Targets
Independent Estimating Based on Parameters
Decision Support
Aid in Bid/No Bid Decision-Making Process
Analyze Sensitivity of Program/Design Factors
Evaluate Technical/Cost Relationships to Determine Key Cost Drivers
Analyze Competitive Cost Data
Develop Market Price Benchmarks
Optimize Design for System Engineering Trade Studies
8. Trade Study Methodology
9. Creating Your Expert System
15. Building an Expert System Eight Steps Identified to Build an Expert System
1. Expert Systems Product Definition
2. Available History
3. Experts Identification
4. The Knowledge Engineer
5. Key Characteristics Determination
6. Fuzzy Logic
7. Decision Analysis Methodology
8. Innovative Concepts Incorporation
17. Determine What Historical Data Is Available
In-house Programs
Standards
Industry Data
Government Data
Normalize Historical Data
Hours Per Pound
Dollars Per Pound
Component Per Square Foot
Support Ratios
Economic Adjustments
Derive Company Cost Estimating Relationships (CER’s)
18. Who Is an Expert?
Senior Estimator
Manufacturing Lead Person
Shop Manager
Senior Manufacturing Engineer
Senior Design Engineer
19. Natural Language Processing Interfaces With Knowledge and Reasoning
Problem
Use of Natural Language Presumes Understanding by the Listener, Not Simple Decoding
Examples:
“British Left Waffles on Falklands”
“Kicking Babies Considered Healthy”
Translation:
“The Spirit Is Willing, but the Flesh Is Weak”
“The Vodka Is Fine, but the Meat Is Rotten”
20. Building an Expert System What Is a “Knowledge Engineer?”
A Person Who Designs the Logic Paths in an Expert System
May Not Be an “Expert” in the Subject Matter of That Particular Expert System
A Person Who Understands the Decision/logic Process of Reaching a Conclusion
A Person That Can Interpret the Logic Process Used by the “Experts”
21. Building an Expert System What Are “Key Characteristics”
Key Characteristics Are the Properties of an Item That an Expert Uses to Estimate
Weight Fastener Count Schedule
Size Materials Power
Speed Surface Contour Part Count
Manufacturing Technology Environment
Who Identifies the “Key Characteristics” Used?
Identified by the Experts in Each Functional Department
How Are “Key Characteristics” Used?
Knowledge Engineers Use the Key Characteristics and Fuzzy Logic to Construct a Relationship Between the Key Characteristics and the Relevant Historical Data
22. What is Fuzzy Logic?
Fuzzy Logic Is a Calculus of Compatibility. Unlike Probability, Which Is Based on Frequency Distribution in a Random Population, Fuzzy Logic Deals With Describing the Characteristics of Properties.
Fuzzy Logic Describes Properties That Have Continuously Varying Values by Associating Partitions of These Values With Semantic Label
Bill Is Tall
Tom Is Short
A One Pound Part Is Average
A Small Part Has a Value of Less Than 0.8 Lb.
A Heavy Part Has a Value of over 5.5 Lb.
Fuzziness Is a Measure of How Well an Instance (Value) Conforms to a Semantic Ideal or Concept Building an Expert System
23. Boolean Logic
24. Why Fuzzy? Most Modes of Human Reasoning and Common Sense Reasoning Are Approximate in Nature
Approximation of Data
Incompleteness of Data
Uncertainty of Knowledge
Is a Statement Absolutely True and Auditable?
Imprecision of Knowledge
Inflation: 3.8% Versus Low Rate
Fuzzy Logic Handles Partial Truth Value
Between “Completely True” and “Completely False”
25. Incorporates Objective and Subjective Selection Criteria in a Structured Approach
Considers Relative Importance of Criteria in Determining the Worth of the Alternatives
Overall Performance Is Summation of Weighted Utility Value of Each Criteria
Output Is a Single Value That Represents the Relative Worth of an Alternative Building an Expert System
26. Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis Management Science and Systems Engineering Tool
Systematic
Repeatable
Accountable/Traceable
Flexible
Fast
Concept Originally Applied by Economists and Market Researchers
Also known as Hierarchical Analytical Process
27. The Hierarchical Analytical Process*
28. Weighting Factors Establish Weighting Factors for Each Step of the Hierarchy
Determine the Value (or Utility) of Each Contributor to Cost
The Sum of the Utilities Must Equal “1”
Compute a Relative Adjustment Factor
29. Some Multi-Attributes Contained in an Expert System
30. Building an Expert System Value/Producibility Engineering
Design/Build Teams
Design to Cost
2-D and 3-D Computerized Modeling
Advanced Tooling Philosophy
Determinate Assembly
Automated Factory
Integrated Design/Manufacturing Data Base
New Materials
Advanced Processes
“Can Do” Attitude
31. Benefits From Establishing an “Expert System” Gives a Consistent Starting Point for All Estimates
Captures the Thought Process of Senior Estimators
Helps Train New Personnel
Helps Retain the Experiences of the ”Expert” When They Retire or Leave the Company
Captures
Rules to Be Applied
Questions to Be Asked
Default Values
Puts Discipline in the Estimating System.
Helps Support “Estimator's Opinion” for Proposal Justification
32. Top Down Parametric Model Used to Estimate Total Recurring Production Costs by Function
Cost Drivers Include:
Weight and Material Mix
T1 Man-hours by Material Type
Multiple Slope Improvement Curves for Labor and Material
Programmatics
Economics
T1 Cost and Improvements Curves for
Avionics
Equipment
Raw Materials
33. Role of Top-Down Recurring Cost Model
34. Expert Systems and Process Modeling Apply Knowledge Based Expert System Techniques to Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) Models
DFMA Models Are Based on Rule Building
Process Models Help Retain Expert Knowledge
35. Process Based Cost Prediction Tool Design for Manufacturing and Assembly DFMA
36. Process Based Cost Model Vought Applies the Boothroyd Dewhurst Inc. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) Software Suite of Design for Assembly (DFA) and Design for Manufacturing (DFM) Concurrent Costing Models From For Use in Performing Cost Trade Studies
Design for Assembly (DFA) Involves Step-by-step Assessment of Manufacturability Issues
Design for Assembly Is a Systematic Procedure Used to Reduce Overall Product Cost Through Design Simplification.
User Can Develop Relationships Based on Historical Data
38. Metallic Processes Metallic Product Analysis Is Generated With Current Levels of Process Information
Evaluate Differences in Configuration Concepts
Metallic Component Assembly Is Mature and Well Understood
39. Composite Processes Vought Aircraft Has a Wide Range of Programs That Employ Composite Material Application
Composite Product Analysis Is Generated With Current Levels of Process Information
Vought Derived Equations are proprietary
Models Vought’s Current Composite Manufacturing Processes
Data Concerning New Processes Developed From Synthesized From Simulations
41. In Conclusion